Bridges Capital Tactical Etf Market Value
| BDGS Etf | 34.56 0.31 0.91% |
| Symbol | Bridges |
Investors evaluate Bridges Capital Tactical using market value (trading price) and book value (balance sheet equity), each telling a different story. Calculating Bridges Capital's intrinsic value - the estimated true worth - helps identify when the stock trades at a discount or premium to fair value. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. External factors like market trends, sector rotation, and investor psychology can cause Bridges Capital's market price to deviate significantly from intrinsic value.
It's important to distinguish between Bridges Capital's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Bridges Capital should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. Conversely, Bridges Capital's market price signifies the transaction level at which participants voluntarily complete trades.
Bridges Capital 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Bridges Capital's etf what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Bridges Capital.
| 11/11/2025 |
| 02/09/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Bridges Capital on November 11, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Bridges Capital Tactical or generate 0.0% return on investment in Bridges Capital over 90 days. Bridges Capital is related to or competes with Pacer Swan, Direxion Daily, Invesco Top, Northern Lights, Fundamental Income, Lazard Equity, and Relative Sentiment. Bridges Capital is entity of United States More
Bridges Capital Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Bridges Capital's etf current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Bridges Capital Tactical upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Information Ratio | (0.28) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 2.2 | |||
| Value At Risk | (0.64) | |||
| Potential Upside | 0.5531 |
Bridges Capital Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Bridges Capital's investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Bridges Capital's standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Bridges Capital historical prices to predict the future Bridges Capital's volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.04) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (0.04) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.06) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (0.09) |
Bridges Capital February 9, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.04) | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.08) | |||
| Mean Deviation | 0.2396 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | (3,109) | |||
| Standard Deviation | 0.3602 | |||
| Variance | 0.1298 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.28) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (0.04) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.06) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (0.09) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 2.2 | |||
| Value At Risk | (0.64) | |||
| Potential Upside | 0.5531 | |||
| Skewness | 0.4619 | |||
| Kurtosis | 3.93 |
Bridges Capital Tactical Backtested Returns
Bridges Capital Tactical secures Sharpe Ratio (or Efficiency) of -0.017, which signifies that the etf had a -0.017 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. Bridges Capital Tactical exposes twenty-three different technical indicators, which can help you to evaluate volatility embedded in its price movement. Please confirm Bridges Capital's Mean Deviation of 0.2396, standard deviation of 0.3602, and Risk Adjusted Performance of (0.04) to double-check the risk estimate we provide. The etf shows a Beta (market volatility) of 0.25, which signifies not very significant fluctuations relative to the market. As returns on the market increase, Bridges Capital's returns are expected to increase less than the market. However, during the bear market, the loss of holding Bridges Capital is expected to be smaller as well.
Auto-correlation | -0.03 |
Very weak reverse predictability
Bridges Capital Tactical has very weak reverse predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Bridges Capital time series from 11th of November 2025 to 26th of December 2025 and 26th of December 2025 to 9th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Bridges Capital Tactical price movement. The serial correlation of -0.03 indicates that only 3.0% of current Bridges Capital price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.03 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | -0.12 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 0.02 |
Thematic Opportunities
Explore Investment Opportunities
Check out Bridges Capital Correlation, Bridges Capital Volatility and Bridges Capital Performance module to complement your research on Bridges Capital. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.
Bridges Capital technical etf analysis exercises models and trading practices based on price and volume transformations, such as the moving averages, relative strength index, regressions, price and return correlations, business cycles, etf market cycles, or different charting patterns.