Qs Defensive Growth Fund Market Value
| LMLRX Fund | USD 13.70 0.04 0.29% |
| Symbol | LMLRX |
Qs Defensive 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Qs Defensive's mutual fund what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Qs Defensive.
| 10/25/2025 |
| 01/23/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Qs Defensive on October 25, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Qs Defensive Growth or generate 0.0% return on investment in Qs Defensive over 90 days. Qs Defensive is related to or competes with Alger Dynamic, Summit Global, Palm Valley, Sit Dividend, Royce Small-cap, Sit Dividend, and American Beacon. The fund is a fund of fundsit invests in other mutual funds and may also invest in exchange-traded funds More
Qs Defensive Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Qs Defensive's mutual fund current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Qs Defensive Growth upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Downside Deviation | 0.3808 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.12) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 2.52 | |||
| Value At Risk | (0.53) | |||
| Potential Upside | 0.5344 |
Qs Defensive Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Qs Defensive's investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Qs Defensive's standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Qs Defensive historical prices to predict the future Qs Defensive's volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.1089 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.0173 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.0025 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | (0.11) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.143 |
Qs Defensive January 23, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.1089 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.153 | |||
| Mean Deviation | 0.2732 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 0.1968 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 0.3808 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 623.52 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 0.3772 | |||
| Variance | 0.1423 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.12) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.0173 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.0025 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | (0.11) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.143 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 2.52 | |||
| Value At Risk | (0.53) | |||
| Potential Upside | 0.5344 | |||
| Downside Variance | 0.145 | |||
| Semi Variance | 0.0387 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (0.34) | |||
| Skewness | 0.516 | |||
| Kurtosis | 3.3 |
Qs Defensive Growth Backtested Returns
At this stage we consider LMLRX Mutual Fund to be very steady. Qs Defensive Growth retains Efficiency (Sharpe Ratio) of 0.12, which implies the entity had a 0.12 % return per unit of price deviation over the last 3 months. We have found twenty-eight technical indicators for Qs Defensive, which you can use to evaluate the volatility of the fund. Please check Qs Defensive's market risk adjusted performance of 0.153, and Standard Deviation of 0.3772 to confirm if the risk estimate we provide is consistent with the expected return of 0.0451%. The fund owns a Beta (Systematic Risk) of 0.35, which implies possible diversification benefits within a given portfolio. As returns on the market increase, Qs Defensive's returns are expected to increase less than the market. However, during the bear market, the loss of holding Qs Defensive is expected to be smaller as well.
Auto-correlation | -0.22 |
Weak reverse predictability
Qs Defensive Growth has weak reverse predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Qs Defensive time series from 25th of October 2025 to 9th of December 2025 and 9th of December 2025 to 23rd of January 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Qs Defensive Growth price movement. The serial correlation of -0.22 indicates that over 22.0% of current Qs Defensive price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.22 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.11 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 0.03 |
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Other Information on Investing in LMLRX Mutual Fund
Qs Defensive financial ratios help investors to determine whether LMLRX Mutual Fund is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in LMLRX with respect to the benefits of owning Qs Defensive security.
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |