Energy Services Fund Market Value
| RYVIX Fund | USD 300.68 7.28 2.36% |
| Symbol | Energy |
Energy Services 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Energy Services' mutual fund what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Energy Services.
| 11/15/2025 |
| 02/13/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Energy Services on November 15, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Energy Services Fund or generate 0.0% return on investment in Energy Services over 90 days. Energy Services is related to or competes with Consumer Goods, Mississippi Tax-free, Transportation Fund, Wasatch International, SMART Earnings, Sp Smallcap, and Retailing Fund. Under normal circumstances, the fund invests substantially all of its net assets in equity securities of Energy Services... More
Energy Services Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Energy Services' mutual fund current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Energy Services Fund upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Downside Deviation | 1.82 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.1894 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 8.92 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.72) | |||
| Potential Upside | 4.06 |
Energy Services Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Energy Services' investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Energy Services' standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Energy Services historical prices to predict the future Energy Services' volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.1937 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.3508 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.2671 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.1998 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.3679 |
Energy Services February 13, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.1937 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.3779 | |||
| Mean Deviation | 1.47 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 1.49 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 1.82 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 432.08 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 1.92 | |||
| Variance | 3.69 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.1894 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.3508 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.2671 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.1998 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.3679 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 8.92 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.72) | |||
| Potential Upside | 4.06 | |||
| Downside Variance | 3.31 | |||
| Semi Variance | 2.22 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (1.70) | |||
| Skewness | (0) | |||
| Kurtosis | 0.2821 |
Energy Services Backtested Returns
Energy Services appears to be very steady, given 3 months investment horizon. Energy Services secures Sharpe Ratio (or Efficiency) of 0.28, which denotes the fund had a 0.28 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. By reviewing Energy Services' technical indicators, you can evaluate if the expected return of 0.52% is justified by implied risk. Please utilize Energy Services' Downside Deviation of 1.82, mean deviation of 1.47, and Coefficient Of Variation of 432.08 to check if our risk estimates are consistent with your expectations. The fund shows a Beta (market volatility) of 1.18, which means a somewhat significant risk relative to the market. As the market goes up, the company is expected to outperform it. However, if the market returns are negative, Energy Services will likely underperform.
Auto-correlation | 0.33 |
Below average predictability
Energy Services Fund has below average predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Energy Services time series from 15th of November 2025 to 30th of December 2025 and 30th of December 2025 to 13th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Energy Services price movement. The serial correlation of 0.33 indicates that nearly 33.0% of current Energy Services price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.33 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.46 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 401.16 |
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Other Information on Investing in Energy Mutual Fund
Energy Services financial ratios help investors to determine whether Energy Mutual Fund is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Energy with respect to the benefits of owning Energy Services security.
| Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
| Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios |