Designer Brands Return On Equity vs. Gross Profit
| DBI Stock | USD 4.96 0.08 1.59% |
Return On Equity | First Reported 2010-12-31 | Previous Quarter 0.08090307 | Current Value 0.15161306 | Quarterly Volatility 0.02868362 |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.3 | 0.317 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.0614 | 0.0095 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.097 | 0.0235 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.0981 | 0.0131 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.11 | 0.014 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.15 | 0.0809 |
|
|
For Designer Brands profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Designer Brands to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Designer Brands utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Designer Brands's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Designer Brands over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Designer |
Is Specialty Retail space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.57) | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share (0.03) | Revenue Per Share 53.234 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.03) |
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
Designer Brands Gross Profit vs. Return On Equity Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Designer Brands's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Designer Brands value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Designer Brands is rated below average in return on equity category among its peers. It is rated # 2 in gross profit category among its peers . As of now, Designer Brands' Return On Equity is decreasing as compared to previous years. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Designer Brands' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.Designer Gross Profit vs. Return On Equity
Return on Equity or ROE tells company stockholders how effectually their money is being utilized or reinvested. It is a useful ratio when analyzing company profitability or the management effectiveness given the capital invested by the shareholders. ROE shows how efficiently a company utilizes investments to generate income.
Designer Brands |
| = | -0.0108 |
For most industries, Return on Equity between 10% and 30% are considered desirable to provide dividends to owners and have funds for the future growth of the company. Investors should be very careful using ROE as the only efficiency indicator because ROE can be high if a company is heavily leveraged.
Gross Profit is the most basic measure of business operational efficiency. It is simply the difference between sales revenue and the cost associated with making a product or providing a service. It is calculated before deducting administrative expenses, taxes, and interest payments.
Designer Brands |
| = | 1.08 B |
Gross Profit varies significantly from one sector to another and tells an investor how much money a business would have made if it didn't have to pay any overhead expenses such as salary, taxes, or rent.
Designer Gross Profit Comparison
Designer Brands is currently under evaluation in gross profit category among its peers.
Designer Brands Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Designer Brands, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Designer Brands will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Designer Brands' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Designer Brands, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -5.6 M | -5.9 M | |
| Operating Income | 72.4 M | 93.9 M | |
| Income Before Tax | 40.2 M | 70.8 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 146.4 M | 153.7 M | |
| Net Income | 29.1 M | 46.8 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 11 M | 10.4 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -32.2 M | -30.6 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 29.2 M | 56 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -44.7 M | -42.4 M | |
| Interest Income | 17.1 M | 9.3 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -32.2 M | -30.6 M | |
| Change To Netincome | -4.8 M | -4.6 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 0.47 | 1.71 | |
| Income Quality | 5.59 | 1.29 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.72 | 0.63 |
Designer Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Designer Brands. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Designer Brands position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Designer Brands' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Use Designer Brands in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Designer Brands Pair Trading
Designer Brands Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Designer Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Designer Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Designer Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Designer Brands to buy it.
The correlation of Designer Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Designer Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Designer Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Designer Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Designer Brands position
In addition to having Designer Brands in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Banking Thematic Idea Now
Banking
Fama and French investing themes focus on testing asset pricing under different economic assumptions. The Banking theme has 61 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Banking Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Investing Opportunities. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.
To fully project Designer Brands' future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Designer Brands at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Designer Brands' income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.