Meta Platforms EBITDA vs. Total Debt

FB2A Stock  EUR 547.60  12.00  2.24%   
Based on Meta Platforms' profitability indicators, Meta Platforms may not be well positioned to generate adequate gross income at the moment. It has a very high risk of underperforming in December. Profitability indicators assess Meta Platforms' ability to earn profits and add value for shareholders.
For Meta Platforms profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Meta Platforms to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Meta Platforms utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Meta Platforms's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Meta Platforms over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
  
Check out Investing Opportunities.
For information on how to trade Meta Stock refer to our How to Trade Meta Stock guide.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Meta Platforms' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Meta Platforms is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Meta Platforms' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Meta Platforms Total Debt vs. EBITDA Fundamental Analysis

Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Meta Platforms's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Meta Platforms value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth.
Meta Platforms is one of the top stocks in ebitda category among its peers. It also is rated as one of the top companies in total debt category among its peers making up about  0.26  of Total Debt per EBITDA. The ratio of EBITDA to Total Debt for Meta Platforms is roughly  3.79 . The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Meta Platforms' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.

Meta Total Debt vs. EBITDA

EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.

Meta Platforms

EBITDA

 = 

Revenue

-

Basic Expenses

 = 
37.63 B
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Total Debt refers to the amount of long term interest-bearing liabilities that a company carries on its balance sheet. That may include bonds sold to the public, notes written to banks or capital leases. Typically, debt can help a company magnify its earnings, but the burden of interest and principal payments will eventually prevent the firm from borrow excessively.

Meta Platforms

Total Debt

 = 

Bonds

+

Notes

 = 
9.92 B
In most industries, total debt may also include the current portion of long-term debt. Since debt terms vary widely from one company to another, simply comparing outstanding debt obligations between different companies may not be adequate. It is usually meant to compare total debt amounts between companies that operate within the same sector.

Meta Total Debt vs Competition

Meta Platforms is rated as one of the top companies in total debt category among its peers. Total debt of Other industry is currently estimated at about 21.36 Billion. Meta Platforms totals roughly 9.92 Billion in total debt claiming about 46% of all equities under Other industry.
Total debt  Workforce  Revenue  Valuation  Capitalization

Meta Profitability Driver Comparison

Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Meta Platforms. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Meta Platforms position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Meta Platforms' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.

Use Meta Platforms in pair-trading

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Meta Platforms position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Meta Platforms will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Meta Platforms Pair Trading

Meta Platforms Pair Trading Analysis

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Meta Platforms could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Meta Platforms when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Meta Platforms - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Meta Platforms to buy it.
The correlation of Meta Platforms is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Meta Platforms moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Meta Platforms moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Meta Platforms can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Use Investing Themes to Complement your Meta Platforms position

In addition to having Meta Platforms in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Alternative Energy Thematic Idea Now

Alternative Energy
Alternative Energy Theme
Large and mid-size companies, ETFs and funds that are either investing or directly involved in providing energy derived from sources not connected to fossil fuels, do not consume natural resources, and do not harm the environment. This includes wind power, nuclear and solar energy, biofuel, ethanol, hydrogen and others alternative sources of energy. The Alternative Energy theme has 42 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Alternative Energy Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch

Additional Information and Resources on Investing in Meta Stock

When determining whether Meta Platforms offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Meta Platforms' financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Meta Platforms Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Meta Platforms Stock:
Check out Investing Opportunities.
For information on how to trade Meta Stock refer to our How to Trade Meta Stock guide.
You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..
To fully project Meta Platforms' future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Meta Platforms at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Meta Platforms' income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.
Potential Meta Platforms investors and stakeholders can use historical trends found within financial statements to determine how well the company is positioned for the future. Although Meta Platforms investors may work on each financial statement separately, they are all related. The changes in Meta Platforms's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses that we see on Meta Platforms's income statement, which results in the company's gains or losses. Cash flows can provide more information regarding cash listed on a balance sheet but not equivalent to net income shown on the income statement. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.