Green Plains EBITDA vs. Shares Owned By Institutions
| GPRE Stock | USD 10.77 0.19 1.73% |
EBITDA | First Reported 2010-12-31 | Previous Quarter 53.6 M | Current Value 70.5 M | Quarterly Volatility 89.2 M |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.0674 | 0.05 |
|
|
For Green Plains profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Green Plains to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Green Plains Renewable utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Green Plains's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Green Plains Renewable over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Green |
Is Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Green Plains. If investors know Green will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Green Plains listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.977 | Earnings Share (0.31) | Revenue Per Share 41.372 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.26) | Return On Assets (0.01) |
The market value of Green Plains Renewable is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Green that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Green Plains' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Green Plains' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Green Plains' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Green Plains' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Green Plains' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Green Plains is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Green Plains' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
Green Plains Renewable Shares Owned By Institutions vs. EBITDA Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Green Plains's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Green Plains value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Green Plains Renewable is one of the top stocks in ebitda category among its peers. It also is one of the top stocks in shares owned by institutions category among its peers . The ratio of EBITDA to Shares Owned By Institutions for Green Plains Renewable is about 552,272 . At present, Green Plains' EBITDA is projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. Comparative valuation analysis is a catch-all technique that is used if you cannot value Green Plains by discounting back its dividends or cash flows. It compares the stock's price multiples to nearest competition to determine if the stock is relatively undervalued or overvalued.Green Shares Owned By Institutions vs. EBITDA
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Green Plains |
| = | 53.6 M |
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Shares Owned by Institutions show the percentage of the outstanding shares of stock issued by a company that is currently owned by other institutions such as asset management firms, hedge funds, or investment banks. Many investors like investing in companies with a large percentage of the firm owned by institutions because they believe that larger firms such as banks, pension funds, and mutual funds, will invest when they think that good things are going to happen.
Green Plains |
| = | 97.05 % |
Since Institution investors conduct a lot of independent research they tend to be more involved and usually more knowledgeable about entities they invest as compared to amateur investors.
Green Shares Owned By Institutions Comparison
Green Plains is currently under evaluation in shares owned by institutions category among its peers.
Green Plains Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Green Plains, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Green Plains will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Green Plains' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Green Plains, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -3.2 M | -3.3 M | |
| Operating Income | -61.6 M | -58.5 M | |
| Income Before Tax | -82.3 M | -78.2 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -20.8 M | -19.7 M | |
| Net Loss | -76.3 M | -72.5 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | -5.6 M | -5.3 M | |
| Net Loss | -114.5 M | -108.8 M | |
| Net Loss | -120.6 M | -114.6 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -764.8 K | -726.5 K | |
| Interest Income | 11 M | 6 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -24.4 M | -25.7 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 57.4 M | 38.3 M | |
| Net Loss | (1.59) | (1.51) | |
| Income Quality | (0.74) | (0.70) | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 1.13 | 0.69 |
Green Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Green Plains. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Green Plains position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Green Plains' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Use Green Plains in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Green Plains position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Green Plains will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Green Plains Pair Trading
Green Plains Renewable Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Green Plains could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Green Plains when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Green Plains - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Green Plains Renewable to buy it.
The correlation of Green Plains is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Green Plains moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Green Plains Renewable moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Green Plains can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Green Plains position
In addition to having Green Plains in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Restaurants Thematic Idea Now
Restaurants
Entities that are involved in restaurant business, as well as coffee shop chains and other eateries. The Restaurants theme has 42 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Restaurants Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.
To fully project Green Plains' future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Green Plains Renewable at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Green Plains' income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.