Maple Leaf Revenue vs. Price To Earning

MFI Stock  CAD 22.60  0.10  0.44%   
Considering the key profitability indicators obtained from Maple Leaf's historical financial statements, Maple Leaf Foods may not be well positioned to generate adequate gross income at this time. It has a very high probability of underperforming in January. Profitability indicators assess Maple Leaf's ability to earn profits and add value for shareholders.
 
Total Revenue  
First Reported
1996-03-31
Previous Quarter
1.3 B
Current Value
1.3 B
Quarterly Volatility
241.4 M
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
As of the 11th of December 2024, Price To Sales Ratio is likely to drop to 0.41. In addition to that, Days Sales Outstanding is likely to drop to 20.87. At this time, Maple Leaf's Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 11th of December 2024, Interest Income is likely to grow to about 59.9 M, while Operating Income is likely to drop about 5.8 M.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.07520.0927
Significantly Down
Very volatile
For Maple Leaf profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Maple Leaf to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Maple Leaf Foods utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Maple Leaf's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Maple Leaf Foods over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
  
Check out Correlation Analysis.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Maple Leaf's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Maple Leaf is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Maple Leaf's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Maple Leaf Foods Price To Earning vs. Revenue Fundamental Analysis

Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Maple Leaf's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Maple Leaf value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth.
Maple Leaf Foods is rated below average in revenue category among its peers. It is regarded second in price to earning category among its peers . The ratio of Revenue to Price To Earning for Maple Leaf Foods is about  164,568,222 . At this time, Maple Leaf's Total Revenue is very stable compared to the past year. Comparative valuation analysis is a catch-all model that can be used if you cannot value Maple Leaf by discounting back its dividends or cash flows. This model doesn't attempt to find an intrinsic value for Maple Leaf's Stock. Still, instead, it compares the stock's price multiples to a benchmark or nearest competition to determine if the stock is relatively undervalued or overvalued.

Maple Revenue vs. Competition

Maple Leaf Foods is rated below average in revenue category among its peers. Market size based on revenue of Consumer Staples industry is now estimated at about 140.61 Billion. Maple Leaf holds roughly 4.87 Billion in revenue claiming about 3% of stocks in Consumer Staples industry.

Maple Price To Earning vs. Revenue

Revenue is income that a firm generates from business activities such us rendering services or selling goods to customers. It is a crucial part of a business and an essential item when evaluating a company's financial statements. Revenues from a firm's primary business operations can be reported on the income statement as sales revenue, net sales, or simply sales, depending on the industry in which a given company operates.

Maple Leaf

Revenue

 = 

Money Received

-

Discounts and Returns

 = 
4.87 B
Revenue is typically recorded when cash or cash equivalents are exchanged for services or goods and can include products or services discounts, promotions, as well as early payments on invoices or services rendered in advance.
Price to Earnings ratio is typically used for current valuation of a company and is one of the most popular ratios that investors monitor daily. Holding a low PE stock is less risky because when a company's profitability falls, it is likely that earnings will also go down as well. In other words, if you start from a lower position, your downside risk is limited. There are also some investors who believe that low Price to Earnings ratio reflects the low pricing because a given company is in trouble. On the other hand, a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of profit.

Maple Leaf

P/E

 = 

Market Value Per Share

Earnings Per Share

 = 
29.58 X
Generally speaking, the Price to Earnings ratio gives investors an idea of what the market is willing to pay for the company's current earnings.

Maple Price To Earning Comparison

Maple Leaf is currently under evaluation in price to earning category among its peers.

Maple Leaf Profitability Projections

The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Maple Leaf, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Maple Leaf will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Maple Leaf's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Maple Leaf, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income47.8 M50.2 M
Operating Income6.1 M5.8 M
Income Before Tax-142.6 M-135.5 M
Total Other Income Expense Net-148.8 M-141.3 M
Net Loss-125 M-118.7 M
Income Tax Expense-17.6 M-16.8 M
Net Loss-125 M-118.7 M
Net Loss-280.7 M-266.7 M
Interest Income57 M59.9 M
Net Interest Income-150.9 M-143.3 M
Change To Netincome275.4 M289.2 M
Net Loss(1.03)(0.97)
Income Quality(1.42)(1.34)
Net Income Per E B T 0.88  0.92 

Maple Profitability Driver Comparison

Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Maple Leaf. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Maple Leaf position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Maple Leaf's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.

Use Maple Leaf in pair-trading

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Maple Leaf Pair Trading

Maple Leaf Foods Pair Trading Analysis

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Maple Leaf could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Maple Leaf when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Maple Leaf - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Maple Leaf Foods to buy it.
The correlation of Maple Leaf is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Maple Leaf moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Maple Leaf Foods moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Maple Leaf can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Use Investing Themes to Complement your Maple Leaf position

In addition to having Maple Leaf in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Millennials Best Thematic Idea Now

Millennials Best
Millennials Best Theme
Companies or funds that provide products or services that appeal to the generation of millennials and that are expected to experience growth in the next 5 years. The millennial generation usually refers to the demographic population that were born between 1980 to 2000. The Millennials Best theme has 77 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Millennials Best Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch

Other Information on Investing in Maple Stock

To fully project Maple Leaf's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Maple Leaf Foods at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Maple Leaf's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.
Potential Maple Leaf investors and stakeholders can use historical trends found within financial statements to determine how well the company is positioned for the future. Although Maple Leaf investors may work on each financial statement separately, they are all related. The changes in Maple Leaf's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses that we see on Maple Leaf's income statement, which results in the company's gains or losses. Cash flows can provide more information regarding cash listed on a balance sheet but not equivalent to net income shown on the income statement. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.