Microsoft Z Score vs. Total Asset
| MSF Stock | EUR 400.20 1.20 0.30% |
For Microsoft profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Microsoft to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Microsoft utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Microsoft's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Microsoft over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Microsoft |
Microsoft Total Asset vs. Z Score Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Microsoft's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Microsoft value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Microsoft is considered to be number one stock in z score category among its peers. It also is considered to be number one stock in total asset category among its peers fabricating about 12,668,055,556 of Total Asset per Z Score. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Microsoft's earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.Microsoft Total Asset vs. Z Score
Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..
Microsoft |
| = | 28.8 |
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
Total Asset is everything that a business owns. It is the sum of current and long-term assets owned by a firm at a given time. These assets are listed on a balance sheet and typically valued based on their purchasing prices, not the current market value.
Microsoft |
| = | 364.84 B |
Total Asset is typically divided on the balance sheet on current asset and long-term asset. Long-term is the value of company property and other capital assets that are expected to be useable for more than one year. Long term assets are reported net of depreciation. On the other hand current assets are assets that are expected to be sold or converted to cash as part of normal business operation.
Microsoft Total Asset Comparison
Microsoft is currently under evaluation in total asset category among its peers.
Microsoft Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Microsoft. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Microsoft position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Microsoft's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Use Microsoft in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microsoft will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Microsoft Pair Trading
Microsoft Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Microsoft could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Microsoft when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Microsoft - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Microsoft to buy it.
The correlation of Microsoft is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Microsoft moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Microsoft moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Microsoft can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Microsoft position
In addition to having Microsoft in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Corporate Bonds Funds Thematic Idea Now
Corporate Bonds Funds
Funds or Etfs investing in different types of corporate debt instruments. The Corporate Bonds Funds theme has 45 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Corporate Bonds Funds Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Additional Information and Resources on Investing in Microsoft Stock
When determining whether Microsoft is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Microsoft Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Microsoft Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Microsoft Stock:Check out Correlation Analysis. To learn how to invest in Microsoft Stock, please use our How to Invest in Microsoft guide.You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.
To fully project Microsoft's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Microsoft at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Microsoft's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.