Microsoft Return On Equity vs. Revenue
MSFT Stock | USD 417.00 4.13 1.00% |
Return On Equity | First Reported 2010-12-31 | Previous Quarter 0.32828138 | Current Value 0.24 | Quarterly Volatility 0.08159037 |
Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.87 | 0.6976 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.22 | 0.3596 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.29 | 0.4464 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.42 | 0.4397 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.2 | 0.1721 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.24 | 0.3283 |
|
|
For Microsoft profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Microsoft to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Microsoft utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Microsoft's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Microsoft over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Microsoft |
Microsoft's Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment
Check out Correlation Analysis.
Is Systems Software space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Microsoft. If investors know Microsoft will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Microsoft listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.104 | Dividend Share 3.08 | Earnings Share 12.09 | Revenue Per Share 34.202 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.16 |
The market value of Microsoft is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Microsoft that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Microsoft's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Microsoft's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Microsoft's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Microsoft's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Microsoft's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Microsoft is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Microsoft's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
Microsoft Revenue vs. Return On Equity Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Microsoft's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Microsoft value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Microsoft is regarded third in return on equity category among its peers. It is rated top company in revenue category among its peers totaling about 688,544,943,820 of Revenue per Return On Equity. At this time, Microsoft's Return On Equity is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Comparative valuation analysis is a catch-all technique that is used if you cannot value Microsoft by discounting back its dividends or cash flows. It compares the stock's price multiples to nearest competition to determine if the stock is relatively undervalued or overvalued.Microsoft Revenue vs. Return On Equity
Return on Equity or ROE tells company stockholders how effectually their money is being utilized or reinvested. It is a useful ratio when analyzing company profitability or the management effectiveness given the capital invested by the shareholders. ROE shows how efficiently a company utilizes investments to generate income.
Microsoft |
| = | 0.36 |
For most industries, Return on Equity between 10% and 30% are considered desirable to provide dividends to owners and have funds for the future growth of the company. Investors should be very careful using ROE as the only efficiency indicator because ROE can be high if a company is heavily leveraged.
Revenue is income that a firm generates from business activities such us rendering services or selling goods to customers. It is a crucial part of a business and an essential item when evaluating a company's financial statements. Revenues from a firm's primary business operations can be reported on the income statement as sales revenue, net sales, or simply sales, depending on the industry in which a given company operates.
Microsoft |
| = | 245.12 B |
Revenue is typically recorded when cash or cash equivalents are exchanged for services or goods and can include products or services discounts, promotions, as well as early payments on invoices or services rendered in advance.
Microsoft Revenue vs Competition
Microsoft is rated top company in revenue category among its peers. Market size based on revenue of Information Technology industry is now estimated at about 363.97 Billion. Microsoft totals roughly 245.12 Billion in revenue claiming about 67% of equities under Information Technology industry.
Microsoft Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Microsoft, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Microsoft will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Microsoft's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Microsoft, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -5.6 B | -5.3 B | |
Operating Income | 109.4 B | 114.9 B | |
Income Before Tax | 107.8 B | 113.2 B | |
Total Other Income Expense Net | -1.6 B | -1.6 B | |
Net Income | 88.1 B | 92.5 B | |
Income Tax Expense | 19.7 B | 20.6 B | |
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 83.2 B | 87.4 B | |
Net Income From Continuing Ops | 88.1 B | 92.5 B | |
Non Operating Income Net Other | 382.9 M | 605.6 M | |
Net Interest Income | 222 M | 233.1 M | |
Interest Income | 3.2 B | 1.8 B | |
Change To Netincome | 1.3 B | 2 B | |
Net Income Per Share | 11.86 | 12.45 | |
Income Quality | 1.35 | 1.18 | |
Net Income Per E B T | 0.82 | 0.58 |
Microsoft Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Microsoft. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Microsoft position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Microsoft's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Use Microsoft in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microsoft will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Microsoft Pair Trading
Microsoft Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Microsoft could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Microsoft when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Microsoft - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Microsoft to buy it.
The correlation of Microsoft is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Microsoft moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Microsoft moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Microsoft can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Microsoft position
In addition to having Microsoft in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Health Management Thematic Idea Now
Health Management
Major hospitals and healthcare providers. The Health Management theme has 48 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Health Management Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All Next | Launch |
Additional Tools for Microsoft Stock Analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.