Scientific Games Return On Asset vs. Shares Owned By Insiders

TJW Stock  EUR 94.00  5.00  5.62%   
Based on Scientific Games' profitability indicators, Scientific Games may not be well positioned to generate adequate gross income at the moment. It has a very high risk of underperforming in December. Profitability indicators assess Scientific Games' ability to earn profits and add value for shareholders.
For Scientific Games profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Scientific Games to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Scientific Games utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Scientific Games's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Scientific Games over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
  
Check out World Market Map.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Scientific Games' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Scientific Games is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Scientific Games' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Scientific Games Shares Owned By Insiders vs. Return On Asset Fundamental Analysis

Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Scientific Games's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Scientific Games value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth.
Scientific Games is currently regarded as top stock in return on asset category among its peers. It also is currently regarded as top stock in shares owned by insiders category among its peers making about  38.29  of Shares Owned By Insiders per Return On Asset. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Scientific Games' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.

Scientific Shares Owned By Insiders vs. Return On Asset

Return on Asset or ROA shows how effective is the management of the company in generating income from utilizing all of the assets at their disposal. It is a useful ratio to evaluate the performance of different departments of a company as well as to understand management performance over time.

Scientific Games

Return On Asset

 = 

Net Income

Total Assets

 = 
0.0316
Return on Asset measures overall efficiency of a company in generating profits from its total assets. It is expressed as the percentage of profits earned per dollar of Asset. A low ROA typically means that a company is asset-intensive and therefore will needs more money to continue generating revenue in the future.
Shares Owned by Insiders show the percentage of outstanding shares owned by insiders (such as principal officers or members of the board of directors) or private individuals and entities with over 5% of the total shares outstanding. Company executives or private individuals with access to insider information share information about a firm's operations that is not available to the general public.

Scientific Games

Insiders Shares

 = 

Executives Shares

+

Employees

 = 
1.21 %
Although the research on effects of insider trading on prices and volatility is still relatively inconclusive, and investors are advised to pay close attention to the distribution of equities among company's stakeholders to avoid many problems associated with the disclosure of price-sensitive information.

Scientific Games Profitability Projections

The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Scientific Games, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Scientific Games will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Scientific Games' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Scientific Games, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
Scientific Games Corporation develops technology-based products and services, and related content for the gaming, lottery, and digital gaming industries worldwide. The company was founded in 1984 and is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada. SCIENT GAMES operates under Gambling classification in Germany and is traded on Frankfurt Stock Exchange. It employs 9700 people.

Scientific Profitability Driver Comparison

Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Scientific Games. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Scientific Games position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Scientific Games' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.

Use Scientific Games in pair-trading

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scientific Games will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Scientific Games Pair Trading

Scientific Games Pair Trading Analysis

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Scientific Games could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Scientific Games when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Scientific Games - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Scientific Games to buy it.
The correlation of Scientific Games is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Scientific Games moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Scientific Games moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Scientific Games can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Use Investing Themes to Complement your Scientific Games position

In addition to having Scientific Games in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Market Neutral Funds Thematic Idea Now

Market Neutral Funds
Market Neutral Funds Theme
Funds or Etfs that invest in both long and short positions of different entities to enhance returns from broad market movements over time. The Market Neutral Funds theme has 47 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Market Neutral Funds Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch

Other Information on Investing in Scientific Stock

To fully project Scientific Games' future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Scientific Games at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Scientific Games' income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.
Potential Scientific Games investors and stakeholders can use historical trends found within financial statements to determine how well the company is positioned for the future. Although Scientific Games investors may work on each financial statement separately, they are all related. The changes in Scientific Games's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses that we see on Scientific Games's income statement, which results in the company's gains or losses. Cash flows can provide more information regarding cash listed on a balance sheet but not equivalent to net income shown on the income statement. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.