EP EMERGING Competition
| EPEIX Fund | USD 13.00 0.05 0.39% |
EP EMERGING and Stsux Correlation View
Weak diversification
Across the chosen horizon, EP EMERGING and Stsux show a correlation of 0.43 and fall into the Weak diversification bucket. This chart measures the degree of risk overlap between EP EMERGING and Stsux.
The mean reversion principle applied to EP EMERGING's suggests that neither prolonged outperformance nor underperformance is permanent. Identifying the root cause of EP EMERGING's price dislocation is essential before acting on a mean reversion signal. The mean reversion tendency in EP EMERGING's price is a well-documented phenomenon in academic research. In many cases, EP EMERGING's price extremes present statistical patterns that have recurred historically.
EP EMERGING Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Ep Emerging Markets matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong recent returns in EPEIX Mutual Fund do not always mean EP EMERGING Mutual Fund is outperforming peers on business quality. Without risk-adjusted context, short-term returns may appear stronger than the volatility required to achieve them would suggest. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPASX | 0.83 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1.12 | 1.62 | 5.33 | |||
| EPEIX | 0.84 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1.11 | 1.58 | 5.32 | |||
| EPIVX | 1.07 | -0.05 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 1.97 | 6.06 | |||
| EPVIX | 1.06 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 6.11 | |||
| SPHIX | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.37 | 1.38 | |||
| FILDX | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.41 | |||
| GCEPX | 1.00 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 1.25 | 2.11 | 5.87 | |||
| SEQFX | 1.09 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 1.38 | 1.99 | 7.43 | |||
| PSTCX | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.87 | |||
| STSUX | 0.25 | 0.07 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 4.39 |
EP EMERGING Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
EP EMERGING Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze EP EMERGING Against Peers
EP EMERGING's peer analysis compares EP EMERGING with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether EP EMERGING trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where EP EMERGING leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
EP EMERGING carries less net debt relative to EBITDA than most competitors, giving it more room to invest or weather downturns. Relative analysis can highlight whether current pricing already reflects peer-group strengths or weaknesses.
Reported values for Ep Emerging Markets are derived from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and standardized for analysis.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Michael Smolkin, Member of Macroaxis Board of Directors