Freight Technologies Competitors

FRGT Stock  USD 0.74  -0.02  -2.63%   
For comparative analysis, Freight Technologies is often evaluated alongside WM Technology, Treasure Global, Auddia, Taoping, and Wearable Devices and other firms. Gross margin gaps between Freight Technologies and its closest rivals often point to structural cost advantages.

Pair Correlation for Freight Technologies and 51Talk Online Summary

Good diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Freight Technologies and 51Talk Online stands at 0.17, or Good diversification. A 0.17 reading means Freight Technologies and 51Talk Online have partial price overlap, providing moderate risk reduction when paired.
Moving together with Freight Stock
  0.63DOMO Domo IncPairCorr
  0.86VERI VeritonePairCorr
  0.91EGAN eGainPairCorr
Moving Against Freight Stock
  0.86MLIDS IDS France SASPairCorr
  0.81TNE Technology OnePairCorr
  0.74MLPAC Pacte NovationPairCorr
  0.6652D0 WONDERFI TECHNOLOGIES INCPairCorr
  0.5HKD AMTD DigitalPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Mean reversion is the tendency of Freight Technologies' price to return to its historical average after periods of extreme deviation. Some analysts monitor this tendency by comparing Freight Technologies' price extremes to fundamental value.
Sentiment
Range
LowSentimentHigh
0.040.736.11
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowIntrinsicHigh
0.6723.0528.43
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
0.010.646.02
Details
Analyst
Consensus
LowTargetHigh
81.9090.0099.90
Details
Freight Technologies is positioned within its peer group by benchmarking margins, returns, and multiples. This peer-relative view identifies where Freight Technologies leads, trails, or tracks its competitive set.

Freight Technologies Competition Correlation Matrix

Competition correlation for Freight Technologies matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. When interpreted alongside fundamentals, correlation analysis separates broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.

High positive correlations

WALDWLDS
TRUGWALD
TRUGWLDS
TRUGMAPS
TRUGAUUD
AUUDMAPS
  

High negative correlations

TRUGMYSZ
OLBMYSZ
WALDMYSZ
MYSZAUUD
MYSZWLDS
COETAOP

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Headline performance for Freight Stock may not fully reflect how the business compares across its competitive set. Peer-relative risk metrics add context on drawdown behavior, consistency, and return quality. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.

Peer Comparison: Net Income

Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Freight Technologies's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Freight Technologies reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.
Compare Freight Technologies and related stocks such as WM Technology, Treasure Global, and Auddia Inc Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental
Price To Sales RatioDividend Yield
Ptb RatioDays Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per ShareFree Cash Flow Yield
Invested CapitalOperating Cash Flow Per Share
Average PayablesStock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To DepreciationPb Ratio
Ev To SalesFree Cash Flow Per Share
RoicInventory Turnover
Net Income Per ShareDays Of Inventory On Hand
Payables TurnoverSales General And Administrative To Revenue
Average InventoryResearch And Ddevelopement To Revenue
Capex To RevenueCash Per Share
PocfratioInterest Coverage
Payout RatioCapex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf RatioDays Payables Outstanding
Net Current Asset ValueIncome Quality
RoeTangible Asset Value
Ev To Operating Cash FlowPe Ratio
Return On Tangible AssetsEv To Free Cash Flow
Earnings YieldIntangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To EBITDACurrent Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per ShareReceivables Turnover
Shareholders Equity Per ShareDebt To Equity
Capex Per ShareGraham Net Net
Average ReceivablesRevenue Per Share
Interest Debt Per ShareDebt To Assets
Graham NumberShort Term Coverage Ratios
Price Earnings RatioOperating Cycle
Price Book Value RatioPrice Earnings To Growth Ratio
Days Of Payables OutstandingDividend Payout Ratio
Price To Operating Cash Flows RatioPrice To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Pretax Profit MarginEbt Per Ebit
Operating Profit MarginEffective Tax Rate
Company Equity MultiplierLong Term Debt To Capitalization
Total Debt To CapitalizationReturn On Capital Employed
Debt Equity RatioEbit Per Revenue
Quick RatioDividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio
Net Income Per EBTCash Ratio
Cash Conversion CycleOperating Cash Flow Sales Ratio
Days Of Inventory OutstandingDays Of Sales Outstanding
Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow RatioCash Flow Coverage Ratios
Price To Book RatioFixed Asset Turnover
Capital Expenditure Coverage RatioPrice Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value MultipleDebt Ratio
Cash Flow To Debt RatioPrice Sales Ratio
Return On AssetsAsset Turnover
Net Profit MarginGross Profit Margin
Price Fair ValueReturn On Equity
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
MAPS18.2 M18.2 M18.2 M18.2 M18.2 M18.2 M18.2 M18.2 M14.4 M-375 K38.8 M60.4 M-116 M-9.9 M7.6 MM1.3 M
TGL-111 K-111 K-111 K-111 K-111 K-111 K-111 K-111 K-111 K-111 K-7.9 M-11.7 M-11.7 M-6.6 M-23.4 M-21 M-20 M
AUUD-2.7 M-2.7 M-2.7 M-2.7 M-2.7 M-2.7 M-2.7 M-2.7 M-3.5 M-5.2 M-4.1 M-21.9 M-6.9 M-8.8 M-8.7 M-7.7 M-8.1 M
TAOP37.8 K7.9 M-89.6 M-119.2 M-29.2 M-7.5 M-18.2 M858.6 K1.7 M-3.6 M-17.7 M-9.9 M-7.1 M-697.9 K-1.8 M-10.1 M-10.6 M
WLDS-977 K-977 K-977 K-977 K-977 K-977 K-977 K-977 K-977 K-977 K-1.3 M-2.6 M-6.5 M-7.8 M-7.9 M-8.1 M-7.7 M
MYSZ-10.5 M-274 K-441 K-307 K-468 K-3.4 M-4.3 M-5.4 M-6 M-5.5 M-6.2 M-10.5 M-8.3 M-6.4 M-4 M-5.9 M-6.1 M
WALD-2.4 M-2.4 M-2.4 M-2.4 M-2.4 M-2.4 M-2.4 M-2.4 M-2.4 M-2.4 M-2.4 M-19.6 M-90 M-90 M-42.4 M-229.7 M-218.3 M
OLB48.4 K-679.5 K-783.9 K-552.1 K-360.3 K-342.3 K-313 K-398.7 K-1.4 M-1.3 M-1.8 M-5 M-7.8 M-23.2 M-11.2 M-5.9 M-5.6 M
TRUG-59.4 K-59.4 K-59.4 K-59.4 K-59.4 K-59.4 K-59.4 K-59.4 K-59.4 K-59.4 K6.2 M-956.8 K-10.3 M-8.8 M-8.8 M-7.9 M-7.5 M

Freight Technologies Competitive Analysis

To gauge Freight Technologies' financial strength, comparing it with WM Technology, Treasure Global, and Auddia offers useful context. Freight Technologies is valued at 2.2 M and generates 13.7 M in revenue. With a -53.55% return on equity and -40.29% net margin, Freight Technologies faces a more difficult earnings environment than some peers. Profit margins tilt toward WM Technology at 1.12% against Freight Technologies at -40.29%. Top-line revenue favors Freight Technologies by a wide margin: 13.7 M to 2.3 M. Return on equity favors Freight Technologies at -53.55%, well ahead of Auddia at -154.18%.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
FRGT MAPS TGL AUUD TAOP WLDS MYSZ
 2.63 
0.74
Freight
 0.00 
0.40
MAPS
 1.88 
4.70
Treasure Global
 6.55 
1.57
Auddia
 2.26 
1.30
Taoping
 0.97 
1.04
Wearable Devices
 3.33 
0.58
MYSZ
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Return On Asset TTM
Total Asset TTM
Net Income TTM
Total Debt TTM
Retained Earnings TTM
Current Liabilities TTM
Net Asset
Current Ratio TTM
Price To Book TTM
Current Valuation
Cash And Equivalents TTM
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Debt To Equity TTM
Current Asset TTM
Trailing Beta
Return On Equity TTM
Profit Margin TTM
Number Of Shares Shorted
Price To Sales TTM
Book Value Per Share TTM
Target Price
Shares Owned By Institutions
EBITDA TTM
Price To Earnings TTM
Price To Earnings To Growth
Gross Profit TTM
Market Capitalization TTM
Earnings Per Share
Short Ratio TTM
Operating Margin TTM
Cash Per Share TTM
Working Capital TTM
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue TTM
Cash Flow From Operations TTM
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Freight Technologies Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Freight Technologies Against Peers

Freight Technologies' peer analysis compares Freight Technologies with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Freight Technologies trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Freight Technologies leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

Freight Technologies' capital allocation track record stands out when measured by cumulative returns on acquisitions versus peers. Geographic revenue mix for Freight Technologies versus peers affects currency exposure and growth opportunity differently. Comparing micro-cap peers across Application Software, Software - Application, Information Technology separates structural strengths from temporary momentum. For peer comparison, Freight Technologies has a market cap of 2.18 million, profit margin of -40.29%.

Freight Technologies metrics are compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized before display.

Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Rifka Kats, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board