Freight Technologies Competitors
| FRGT Stock | USD 0.74 -0.02 -2.63% |
Pair Correlation for Freight Technologies and 51Talk Online Summary
Good diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Freight Technologies and 51Talk Online stands at 0.17, or Good diversification. A 0.17 reading means Freight Technologies and 51Talk Online have partial price overlap, providing moderate risk reduction when paired.
Mean reversion is the tendency of Freight Technologies' price to return to its historical average after periods of extreme deviation. Some analysts monitor this tendency by comparing Freight Technologies' price extremes to fundamental value.
Freight Technologies Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Freight Technologies matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. When interpreted alongside fundamentals, correlation analysis separates broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Headline performance for Freight Stock may not fully reflect how the business compares across its competitive set. Peer-relative risk metrics add context on drawdown behavior, consistency, and return quality. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPS | 4.48 | -0.74 | 0.00 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 8.33 | 49.30 | |||
| TGL | 3.88 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 5.16 | 9.48 | 29.33 | |||
| AUUD | 7.81 | -1.16 | 0.00 | 3.70 | 0.00 | 23.86 | 100.46 | |||
| TAOP | 3.89 | -0.18 | 0.00 | -1.23 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 42.52 | |||
| WLDS | 4.30 | -1.32 | 0.00 | -0.63 | 0.00 | 8.63 | 33.91 | |||
| MYSZ | 3.07 | -0.21 | 0.00 | -0.32 | 0.00 | 5.36 | 18.63 | |||
| WALD | 4.37 | -0.51 | 0.00 | -1.69 | 0.00 | 11.56 | 25.44 | |||
| OLB | 10.98 | 2.29 | 0.27 | -6.47 | 7.77 | 13.64 | 290.89 | |||
| TRUG | 6.97 | -0.87 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 17.95 | 65.66 | |||
| COE | 3.17 | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 9.03 | 27.47 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Freight Technologies's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Freight Technologies reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.Compare Freight Technologies and related stocks such as WM Technology, Treasure Global, and Auddia Inc Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAPS | 18.2 M | 18.2 M | 18.2 M | 18.2 M | 18.2 M | 18.2 M | 18.2 M | 18.2 M | 14.4 M | -375 K | 38.8 M | 60.4 M | -116 M | -9.9 M | 7.6 M | 2 M | 1.3 M |
| TGL | -111 K | -111 K | -111 K | -111 K | -111 K | -111 K | -111 K | -111 K | -111 K | -111 K | -7.9 M | -11.7 M | -11.7 M | -6.6 M | -23.4 M | -21 M | -20 M |
| AUUD | -2.7 M | -2.7 M | -2.7 M | -2.7 M | -2.7 M | -2.7 M | -2.7 M | -2.7 M | -3.5 M | -5.2 M | -4.1 M | -21.9 M | -6.9 M | -8.8 M | -8.7 M | -7.7 M | -8.1 M |
| TAOP | 37.8 K | 7.9 M | -89.6 M | -119.2 M | -29.2 M | -7.5 M | -18.2 M | 858.6 K | 1.7 M | -3.6 M | -17.7 M | -9.9 M | -7.1 M | -697.9 K | -1.8 M | -10.1 M | -10.6 M |
| WLDS | -977 K | -977 K | -977 K | -977 K | -977 K | -977 K | -977 K | -977 K | -977 K | -977 K | -1.3 M | -2.6 M | -6.5 M | -7.8 M | -7.9 M | -8.1 M | -7.7 M |
| MYSZ | -10.5 M | -274 K | -441 K | -307 K | -468 K | -3.4 M | -4.3 M | -5.4 M | -6 M | -5.5 M | -6.2 M | -10.5 M | -8.3 M | -6.4 M | -4 M | -5.9 M | -6.1 M |
| WALD | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -2.4 M | -19.6 M | -90 M | -90 M | -42.4 M | -229.7 M | -218.3 M |
| OLB | 48.4 K | -679.5 K | -783.9 K | -552.1 K | -360.3 K | -342.3 K | -313 K | -398.7 K | -1.4 M | -1.3 M | -1.8 M | -5 M | -7.8 M | -23.2 M | -11.2 M | -5.9 M | -5.6 M |
| TRUG | -59.4 K | -59.4 K | -59.4 K | -59.4 K | -59.4 K | -59.4 K | -59.4 K | -59.4 K | -59.4 K | -59.4 K | 6.2 M | -956.8 K | -10.3 M | -8.8 M | -8.8 M | -7.9 M | -7.5 M |
Freight Technologies Competitive Analysis
To gauge Freight Technologies' financial strength, comparing it with WM Technology, Treasure Global, and Auddia offers useful context. Freight Technologies is valued at 2.2 M and generates 13.7 M in revenue. With a -53.55% return on equity and -40.29% net margin, Freight Technologies faces a more difficult earnings environment than some peers. Profit margins tilt toward WM Technology at 1.12% against Freight Technologies at -40.29%. Top-line revenue favors Freight Technologies by a wide margin: 13.7 M to 2.3 M. Return on equity favors Freight Technologies at -53.55%, well ahead of Auddia at -154.18%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Freight Technologies Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Freight Technologies Against Peers
Freight Technologies' peer analysis compares Freight Technologies with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Freight Technologies trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Freight Technologies leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Freight Technologies' capital allocation track record stands out when measured by cumulative returns on acquisitions versus peers. Geographic revenue mix for Freight Technologies versus peers affects currency exposure and growth opportunity differently. Comparing micro-cap peers across Application Software, Software - Application, Information Technology separates structural strengths from temporary momentum. For peer comparison, Freight Technologies has a market cap of 2.18 million, profit margin of -40.29%.
Freight Technologies metrics are compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized before display.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Rifka Kats, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board