Manhattan Competitors
| LOAN Stock | USD 4.45 0.07 1.55% |
Manhattan Bridge vs Bluerock Homes Correlation
Significant diversification
The correlation between Manhattan Bridge Capital and BHM is 0.03 (i.e., Significant diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Manhattan Bridge Capital and BHM in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with Manhattan Stock
At this time, Manhattan Bridge's Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 15th of February 2026, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.08, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.1. At this time, Manhattan Bridge's Asset Turnover is very stable compared to the past year.Manhattan Bridge Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Manhattan Bridge and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Manhattan and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Manhattan Bridge Capital does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Manhattan Stock performing well and Manhattan Bridge Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Manhattan Bridge's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SACH | 1.53 | (0.05) | 0.00 | (0.03) | 0.00 | 3.00 | 13.97 | |||
| SCCG | 0.49 | 0.05 | (0.02) | (0.68) | 0.53 | 1.11 | 2.82 | |||
| CLPR | 1.75 | (0.13) | 0.00 | (0.37) | 0.00 | 3.55 | 13.64 | |||
| SELF | 0.87 | 0.02 | (0.04) | (0.50) | 1.00 | 1.84 | 5.79 | |||
| SCCF | 0.26 | 0.05 | (0.01) | 1.37 | 0.15 | 0.52 | 1.76 | |||
| LFT | 2.62 | (0.27) | 0.00 | (0.06) | 0.00 | 6.92 | 20.44 | |||
| CHMI | 1.53 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 1.48 | 3.52 | 9.35 | |||
| FTHM | 4.59 | (0.33) | 0.00 | (0.07) | 0.00 | 11.58 | 32.95 | |||
| BHM | 2.77 | (0.02) | (0.01) | 0.03 | 3.42 | 6.64 | 19.50 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Manhattan Bridge Capital and related stocks such as Sachem Capital Corp, Sachem Capital Corp, and Clipper Realty Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SACH | 1.5 M | 1.5 M | 1.5 M | 1.5 M | 1.5 M | 2.3 M | 3.1 M | 4.9 M | 7.8 M | 6.2 M | 9 M | 13.3 M | 20.9 M | 15.9 M | (39.6 M) | (35.6 M) | (33.8 M) |
| SCCG | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 3.1 M | 4.9 M | 7.8 M | 6.2 M | 9 M | 13.3 M | 20.9 M | 15.9 M | (39.6 M) | (35.6 M) | (33.8 M) |
| CLPR | 3.4 M | 3.4 M | 3.4 M | 3.4 M | 5.2 M | (5.1 M) | (3.7 M) | (2.4 M) | (3.6 M) | (1.7 M) | (4.9 M) | (7.6 M) | (4.8 M) | (5.9 M) | (2.5 M) | (2.2 M) | (2.4 M) |
| SELF | 1.7 M | 160 K | 10.7 M | 1.4 M | 6.1 M | 6.1 M | 384.1 K | (146.3 K) | 619.4 K | 590.6 K | 274.3 K | 3.3 M | 2.1 M | 2.9 M | 2.1 M | 2.4 M | 2.9 M |
| LFT | 7.2 M | 7.2 M | 7.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.3 M | 450.5 K | (8 M) | 4.7 M | (5.5 M) | 6.2 M | 8.4 M | 10.5 M | 9.9 M | 19.7 M | 22.6 M | 26 M | 27.3 M |
| CHMI | (150 K) | (150 K) | (150 K) | 21.1 M | 2.4 M | 13.2 M | 24.8 M | 47.4 M | 37.3 M | (43.5 M) | (53.2 M) | 12.3 M | 21.7 M | (34.8 M) | 12 M | 10.8 M | 11.3 M |
| FTHM | (420.6 K) | (420.6 K) | (420.6 K) | (420.6 K) | (420.6 K) | (420.6 K) | (420.6 K) | (420.6 K) | (1.7 M) | (4.1 M) | (1.3 M) | (12.5 M) | (27.6 M) | (24 M) | (21.6 M) | (19.4 M) | (18.4 M) |
| BHM | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | (17.7 M) | 34.3 M | (1000 K) | (4.4 M) | 32 K | 28.8 K | 27.4 K |
Manhattan Bridge Capital and related stocks such as Sachem Capital Corp, Sachem Capital Corp, and Clipper Realty Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Manhattan Bridge Capital financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Manhattan Bridge Capital operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Manhattan Bridge Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Manhattan Bridge competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Manhattan Bridge's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Manhattan Bridge's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Manhattan Bridge Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Manhattan Bridge Competition
Manhattan Bridge's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Manhattan Bridge Capital in relation to its competition. Manhattan Bridge's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Manhattan Bridge in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Manhattan Bridge's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Manhattan Bridge Capital, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Manhattan Bridge position
In addition to having Manhattan Bridge in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Adviser Favorites Thematic Idea Now
Adviser Favorites
Financial advisors frequently recommend that individuals diversify their investment portfolios with a mix of different types of stocks. These can include blue-chip stocks, growth stocks, and dividend stocks. The Adviser Favorites theme has 17 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Adviser Favorites Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Manhattan Bridge Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.
Will Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) sector continue expanding? Could Manhattan diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Manhattan Bridge. Expected growth trajectory for Manhattan significantly influences the price investors are willing to assign. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Manhattan Bridge data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.12) | Dividend Share 0.46 | Earnings Share 0.47 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.09) |
The market value of Manhattan Bridge Capital is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Manhattan that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Manhattan Bridge's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Manhattan Bridge's true underlying value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Because Manhattan Bridge's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Manhattan Bridge's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Understanding that Manhattan Bridge's value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether Manhattan Bridge represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. Meanwhile, Manhattan Bridge's quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.