Snap On Competitors

SNA Stock  USD 370.67  -15.65  -4.05%   
Peers commonly used for benchmarking Snap On include Lennox International, Aecom Technology, Expeditors International, Pentair PLC, and CH Robinson. Interest coverage ratios across Snap On's peer set reveal which firms carry the most financial risk.

Snap On and NVent Electric Correlation Overview

Moderate diversification
Across the chosen horizon, Snap On and NVent Electric show a correlation of 0.29 and fall into the Moderate diversification bucket. The overlap area shows the portion of risk diversified away by holding both instruments together.
Moving together with Snap On Stock
  0.66CR Crane Company Earnings Call This WeekPairCorr
  0.82HY Hyster Yale MaterialsPairCorr
  0.69PH Parker HannifinPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Experienced market participants anticipate that Snap On's price will even out over time. Periods when Snap On's deviates significantly from its historical mean may warrant further fundamental analysis. Mean reversion in Snap On's serves as a complement to momentum analysis.
Sentiment
Range
LowSentimentHigh
369.18370.68372.18
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowIntrinsicHigh
333.60396.67398.17
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
368.66370.16371.65
Details
Analyst
Consensus
LowTargetHigh
354.73389.81432.69
Details
Competitive analysis for Snap On compares its financial performance and valuation metrics against sector peers. Cross-sectional comparison separates idiosyncratic performance from sector-level dynamics. Snap On's metrics are most informative when compared against the strongest and weakest performers in its sector.

Snap On Competition Correlation Matrix

Studying peer correlation around Snap On provides a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. This matrix is most informative when seeking to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

High positive correlations

LECOSWK
LECOLII
SWKLII
CHRWEXPD
FTAILII
LECOACM
  

High negative correlations

NVTPNR
NVTACM
NVTFTAI
NVTGPN
NVTCHRW
NVTLECO

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Strong recent returns in Snap On Stock do not always mean Snap On Company is outperforming peers on business quality. Reviewing Snap On's risk-adjusted indicators gives a clearer view of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.

Peer Comparison: Net Income

Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Snap On's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Snap On reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.
Compare Snap On and related stocks such as Lennox International, Aecom Technology, and Expeditors International Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental
Price To Sales RatioDividend Yield
Ptb RatioDays Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per ShareFree Cash Flow Yield
Invested CapitalOperating Cash Flow Per Share
Average PayablesStock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To DepreciationPb Ratio
Ev To SalesFree Cash Flow Per Share
RoicInventory Turnover
Net Income Per ShareDays Of Inventory On Hand
Payables TurnoverSales General And Administrative To Revenue
Average InventoryResearch And Ddevelopement To Revenue
Capex To RevenueCash Per Share
PocfratioInterest Coverage
Payout RatioCapex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf RatioDays Payables Outstanding
Net Current Asset ValueIncome Quality
RoeTangible Asset Value
Ev To Operating Cash FlowPe Ratio
Return On Tangible AssetsEv To Free Cash Flow
Earnings YieldIntangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To EBITDACurrent Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per ShareReceivables Turnover
Graham NumberShareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To EquityCapex Per Share
Graham Net NetAverage Receivables
Revenue Per ShareInterest Debt Per Share
Debt To AssetsShort Term Coverage Ratios
Price Earnings RatioOperating Cycle
Price Book Value RatioPrice Earnings To Growth Ratio
Days Of Payables OutstandingDividend Payout Ratio
Price To Operating Cash Flows RatioPrice To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Pretax Profit MarginEbt Per Ebit
Operating Profit MarginEffective Tax Rate
Company Equity MultiplierLong Term Debt To Capitalization
Total Debt To CapitalizationReturn On Capital Employed
Debt Equity RatioEbit Per Revenue
Quick RatioDividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio
Net Income Per EBTCash Ratio
Cash Conversion CycleOperating Cash Flow Sales Ratio
Days Of Inventory OutstandingDays Of Sales Outstanding
Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow RatioCash Flow Coverage Ratios
Price To Book RatioFixed Asset Turnover
Capital Expenditure Coverage RatioPrice Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value MultipleDebt Ratio
Cash Flow To Debt RatioPrice Sales Ratio
Return On AssetsAsset Turnover
Net Profit MarginGross Profit Margin
Price Fair ValueReturn On Equity
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
LII52.5 M88.3 M90 M171.8 M205.8 M186.6 M277.8 M305.7 M359 M408.7 M356.3 M464 M497.1 M590.1 M806.9 M786.2 M825.5 M
ACM23 M-58.6 M239.2 M229.9 M-154.8 M96.1 M339.4 M136.5 M-261.1 M-186.4 M173.2 M310.6 M55.3 M402.3 M561.8 M646 M678.3 M
EXPD2.9 M385.7 M333.4 M348.5 M376.9 M457.2 M430.8 M489.3 M618.2 M590.4 M696.1 M1.4 B1.4 B752.9 M810.1 M813.8 M854.5 M
PNR20.1 M34.2 M-107.2 M536.8 M222.9 M469.1 M522.2 M666.5 M347.4 M355.7 M358.6 M553 M480.9 M622.9 M625.4 M653.8 M686.5 M
CHRW34.6 M431.6 M593.8 M415.9 M449.7 M509.7 M513.4 M504.9 M664.5 M577 M506.4 M844.2 M940.5 M325.1 M465.7 M587.1 M399.4 M
FTAI2.2 M2.2 M2.2 M24.8 M7.8 M-11.8 M-20.1 M134 K5.9 M225.1 M-88.5 M-104.2 M-193.2 M243.8 M8.7 M501.1 M526.1 M
GPN33 M209.2 M188.2 M216.1 M245.3 M278 M201.8 M468.4 M452.1 M430.6 M584.5 M965.5 M111.5 M986.2 M1.6 B1.4 B1.5 B
SWK78.3 M673.2 M523.7 M490.1 M760.9 M883.7 M965.3 M1.2 B605.2 M957.5 M1.2 B1.7 B-133.7 M-281.7 M286.3 M401.9 M380.1 M
LECO48 M217.2 M257.4 M293.8 M254.7 M127.5 M198.4 M247.5 M287.1 M293.1 M206.1 M276.6 M472.2 M545.2 M466.1 M520.5 M546.6 M
NVT210.1 M210.1 M210.1 M210.1 M210.1 M210.1 M259.1 M361.7 M230.8 M222.7 M-47.2 M272.9 M399.8 M567.1 M331.8 M710.2 M745.7 M

Snap On Competitive Analysis

Within its peer group that includes Lennox International, Aecom Technology, and Expeditors International, Snap On stands out in several ways. The company commands a 19.20 B market valuation built on 5.16 B in annual revenue. Shareholders see a 18.20% return on equity, supported by a 19.60% profit margin. On equity returns, Lennox International earns 76.79% compared to 18.20% at Snap On. Snap On keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 19.60% margin versus 2.94% at Aecom Technology. Expeditors International pulls in 11.07 B in revenue while Snap On reports 5.16 B.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
SNA LII ACM EXPD PNR CHRW FTAI
 4.05 
370.67
Snap On
 2.73 
526.61
Lennox
 2.92 
81.47
Aecom Technology
 0.41 
151.86
Expeditors
 0.00 
79.01
Pentair PLC
 1.65 
171.37
CHRW
 4.56 
272.54
FTAI Aviation
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Return On Asset TTM
Total Asset TTM
Net Income TTM
Total Debt TTM
Retained Earnings TTM
Current Liabilities TTM
Net Asset
Current Ratio TTM
Price To Book TTM
Current Valuation
Five Year Return
Cash And Equivalents TTM
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Debt To Equity TTM
Annual Yield
Current Asset TTM
Trailing Beta
Return On Equity TTM
Profit Margin TTM
Number Of Shares Shorted
Price To Sales TTM
Book Value Per Share TTM
Target Price
Last Dividend Paid
Shares Owned By Institutions
EBITDA TTM
Price To Earnings TTM
Price To Earnings To Growth
Gross Profit TTM
Market Capitalization TTM
Earnings Per Share
Short Ratio TTM
Operating Margin TTM
Cash Per Share TTM
Working Capital TTM
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue TTM
Cash Flow From Operations TTM
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Snap On Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Snap On Against Peers

Snap On's peer analysis compares Snap On with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Snap On trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Snap On leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

Operating expenses at Snap On as a share of revenue sit below the peer group midpoint, signaling tighter cost control. Peer comparisons can reduce single-name bias by forcing a wider operating and valuation context. For peer comparison, Snap On has a market cap of 19.2 billion, P/E of 14.71, profit margin of 19.6%.

Snap On analytics rely on periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with quality checks and normalization applied.

Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Rifka Kats, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board