Snap On Competitors
| SNA Stock | USD 370.67 -15.65 -4.05% |
Snap On and NVent Electric Correlation Overview
Moderate diversification
Across the chosen horizon, Snap On and NVent Electric show a correlation of 0.29 and fall into the Moderate diversification bucket. The overlap area shows the portion of risk diversified away by holding both instruments together.
Experienced market participants anticipate that Snap On's price will even out over time. Periods when Snap On's deviates significantly from its historical mean may warrant further fundamental analysis. Mean reversion in Snap On's serves as a complement to momentum analysis.
Snap On Competition Correlation Matrix
Studying peer correlation around Snap On provides a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. This matrix is most informative when seeking to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong recent returns in Snap On Stock do not always mean Snap On Company is outperforming peers on business quality. Reviewing Snap On's risk-adjusted indicators gives a clearer view of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LII | 1.96 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 2.57 | 4.69 | 14.13 | |||
| ACM | 1.73 | -0.22 | 0.00 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 3.13 | 15.25 | |||
| EXPD | 1.56 | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 14.84 | |||
| PNR | 1.57 | -0.39 | 0.00 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 14.17 | |||
| CHRW | 2.06 | -0.19 | 0.00 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 4.64 | 17.11 | |||
| FTAI | 3.40 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 3.85 | 7.10 | 21.05 | |||
| GPN | 2.10 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 2.32 | 4.54 | 22.28 | |||
| SWK | 2.21 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 2.50 | 4.61 | 12.65 | |||
| LECO | 1.47 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.70 | 3.53 | 10.05 | |||
| NVT | 2.31 | 0.54 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 2.72 | 4.85 | 11.59 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Snap On's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Snap On reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.Compare Snap On and related stocks such as Lennox International, Aecom Technology, and Expeditors International Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LII | 52.5 M | 88.3 M | 90 M | 171.8 M | 205.8 M | 186.6 M | 277.8 M | 305.7 M | 359 M | 408.7 M | 356.3 M | 464 M | 497.1 M | 590.1 M | 806.9 M | 786.2 M | 825.5 M |
| ACM | 23 M | -58.6 M | 239.2 M | 229.9 M | -154.8 M | 96.1 M | 339.4 M | 136.5 M | -261.1 M | -186.4 M | 173.2 M | 310.6 M | 55.3 M | 402.3 M | 561.8 M | 646 M | 678.3 M |
| EXPD | 2.9 M | 385.7 M | 333.4 M | 348.5 M | 376.9 M | 457.2 M | 430.8 M | 489.3 M | 618.2 M | 590.4 M | 696.1 M | 1.4 B | 1.4 B | 752.9 M | 810.1 M | 813.8 M | 854.5 M |
| PNR | 20.1 M | 34.2 M | -107.2 M | 536.8 M | 222.9 M | 469.1 M | 522.2 M | 666.5 M | 347.4 M | 355.7 M | 358.6 M | 553 M | 480.9 M | 622.9 M | 625.4 M | 653.8 M | 686.5 M |
| CHRW | 34.6 M | 431.6 M | 593.8 M | 415.9 M | 449.7 M | 509.7 M | 513.4 M | 504.9 M | 664.5 M | 577 M | 506.4 M | 844.2 M | 940.5 M | 325.1 M | 465.7 M | 587.1 M | 399.4 M |
| FTAI | 2.2 M | 2.2 M | 2.2 M | 24.8 M | 7.8 M | -11.8 M | -20.1 M | 134 K | 5.9 M | 225.1 M | -88.5 M | -104.2 M | -193.2 M | 243.8 M | 8.7 M | 501.1 M | 526.1 M |
| GPN | 33 M | 209.2 M | 188.2 M | 216.1 M | 245.3 M | 278 M | 201.8 M | 468.4 M | 452.1 M | 430.6 M | 584.5 M | 965.5 M | 111.5 M | 986.2 M | 1.6 B | 1.4 B | 1.5 B |
| SWK | 78.3 M | 673.2 M | 523.7 M | 490.1 M | 760.9 M | 883.7 M | 965.3 M | 1.2 B | 605.2 M | 957.5 M | 1.2 B | 1.7 B | -133.7 M | -281.7 M | 286.3 M | 401.9 M | 380.1 M |
| LECO | 48 M | 217.2 M | 257.4 M | 293.8 M | 254.7 M | 127.5 M | 198.4 M | 247.5 M | 287.1 M | 293.1 M | 206.1 M | 276.6 M | 472.2 M | 545.2 M | 466.1 M | 520.5 M | 546.6 M |
| NVT | 210.1 M | 210.1 M | 210.1 M | 210.1 M | 210.1 M | 210.1 M | 259.1 M | 361.7 M | 230.8 M | 222.7 M | -47.2 M | 272.9 M | 399.8 M | 567.1 M | 331.8 M | 710.2 M | 745.7 M |
Snap On Competitive Analysis
Within its peer group that includes Lennox International, Aecom Technology, and Expeditors International, Snap On stands out in several ways. The company commands a 19.20 B market valuation built on 5.16 B in annual revenue. Shareholders see a 18.20% return on equity, supported by a 19.60% profit margin. On equity returns, Lennox International earns 76.79% compared to 18.20% at Snap On. Snap On keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 19.60% margin versus 2.94% at Aecom Technology. Expeditors International pulls in 11.07 B in revenue while Snap On reports 5.16 B.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Snap On Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Snap On Against Peers
Snap On's peer analysis compares Snap On with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Snap On trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Snap On leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Operating expenses at Snap On as a share of revenue sit below the peer group midpoint, signaling tighter cost control. Peer comparisons can reduce single-name bias by forcing a wider operating and valuation context. For peer comparison, Snap On has a market cap of 19.2 billion, P/E of 14.71, profit margin of 19.6%.
Snap On analytics rely on periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with quality checks and normalization applied.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Rifka Kats, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board