IShares IBonds Correlations

B28A Etf

5.47 0.01 0.18%

The current 90-days correlation between iShares iBonds Dec and Lyxor UCITS Japan is -0.15 (i.e., Good diversification). The correlation of IShares IBonds is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.

IShares IBonds Correlation With Market

Weak diversification

The correlation between iShares iBonds Dec and DJI is 0.36 (i.e., Weak diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding iShares iBonds Dec and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.

The ability to find closely correlated positions to IShares IBonds could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace IShares IBonds when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back IShares IBonds - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling iShares iBonds Dec to buy it.

Moving together with IShares Etf

0.63	JPNH	Lyxor UCITS Japan	Pair Corr
0.69	JPN	Lyxor UCITS Japan	Pair Corr
0.62	EMLD	SSgA SPDR ETFs	Pair Corr
0.83	HHH	HSBC SP 500	Pair Corr
0.83	SPY5	SPDR SP 500	Pair Corr

Moving against IShares Etf

0.43	CACC	Lyxor CAC 40	Pair Corr
0.42	CAC	Amundi CAC 40	Pair Corr

Related Correlations Analysis

	META	MSFT	UBER	F	T	A	CRM	JPM	MRK	XOM
META		0.56	-0.5	-0.46	0.5	0.16	0.65	0.36	-0.36	-0.28	META
MSFT	0.56		-0.63	-0.38	0.38	0.07	0.39	0.14	0.02	-0.8	MSFT
UBER	-0.5	-0.63		0.29	-0.71	0.13	-0.72	-0.51	0.49	0.6	UBER
F	-0.46	-0.38	0.29		0.08	-0.36	0.03	0.38	-0.18	0.51	F
T	0.5	0.38	-0.71	0.08		-0.31	0.88	0.85	-0.75	-0.22	T
A	0.16	0.07	0.13	-0.36	-0.31		-0.32	-0.5	0.6	-0.1	A
CRM	0.65	0.39	-0.72	0.03	0.88	-0.32		0.89	-0.82	-0.19	CRM
JPM	0.36	0.14	-0.51	0.38	0.85	-0.5	0.89		-0.87	0.02	JPM
MRK	-0.36	0.02	0.49	-0.18	-0.75	0.6	-0.82	-0.87		-0.1	MRK
XOM	-0.28	-0.8	0.6	0.51	-0.22	-0.1	-0.19	0.02	-0.1		XOM
	META	MSFT	UBER	F	T	A	CRM	JPM	MRK	XOM

Click cells to compare fundamentals

Check Volatility

Backtest Portfolio

Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features

Correlation Matchups

Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.

High positive correlations

JPM	+ 0.89	CRM
CRM	+ 0.88	T
JPM	+ 0.85	T
CRM	+ 0.65	META
XOM	+ 0.6	UBER
MRK	+ 0.6	A

High negative correlations

MRK	- 0.87	JPM
MRK	- 0.82	CRM
XOM	- 0.8	MSFT
MRK	- 0.75	T
CRM	- 0.72	UBER
T	- 0.71	UBER

IShares IBonds Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between IShares Etf performing well and IShares IBonds ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze IShares IBonds' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

	Mean Deviation	Jensen Alpha	Sortino Ratio	Treynor Ratio	Semi Deviation	Expected Shortfall	Potential Upside	Value @Risk	Maximum Drawdown
META	1.15	0.23	0.14	1.24	1.26	(1.30)	3.22	(1.87)	8.02
MSFT	0.85	0.08	0.04	(0.34)	1.45	(0.81)	1.83	(1.57)	8.14
UBER	1.73	(0.25)	0.00	(0.26)	0.00	0.00	2.67	(5.35)	20.41
F	1.43	(0.17)	0.00	(0.11)	0.00	0.00	2.53	(2.90)	11.21
T	0.97	0.06	0.04	0.45	1.16	(1.05)	1.93	(1.99)	7.95
A	1.26	(0.06)	0.00	(0.11)	0.00	0.00	2.71	(2.42)	9.02
CRM	1.50	0.49	0.31	(14.75)	1.11	(1.75)	3.59	(1.93)	13.87
JPM	1.02	0.13	0.11	0.09	1.11	(1.19)	1.65	(1.44)	15.87
MRK	0.92	(0.24)	0.00	(1.54)	0.00	0.00	1.72	(2.17)	5.17
XOM	0.91	(0.06)	0.00	(0.33)	0.00	0.00	1.83	(2.14)	6.06

IShares IBonds Related Equities

One of the popular trading techniques among algorithmic traders is to use market-neutral strategies where every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if one position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Below are some of the equities that can be combined with IShares IBonds etf to make a market-neutral strategy. Peer analysis of IShares IBonds could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing IShares IBonds by comparing valuation metrics with similar companies.

Lyxor UCITS Japan Lyxor UCITS Japan Lyxor UCITS Stoxx Amundi CAC 40 Gold Bullion Securities Lyxor CAC 40 SSgA SPDR ETFs Xtrackers MSCI Europe HSBC SP 500 SPDR SP 500 American Airlines Group Alcoa Corp Apple Inc Best Buy Co Citigroup

Risk & Return

Correlation

Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions

Feedback Blog

Made with optimal in San Francisco

2024 Macroaxis LLC