Federal Agricultural Company Leadership
| AGM Stock | USD 190.78 0.68 0.36% |
About 84 percent of Federal Agricultural's insiders are selling. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that many Federal Agricultural Mortgage insiders are, at present, terrified. Federal Agricultural employs about 191 people. The company is managed by 32 executives with a total tenure of roughly 211 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 5.97 employees per reported executive.
| Bradford Nordholm CEO President, Chief Executive Officer |
| Myles Watts Chairman Independent Vice Chairman of the Board |
Insider Sentiment 16
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2025-03-04 | Aparna Ramesh | Disposed 1000 @ 201.86 | View | ||
| 2025-02-25 | Mitchell A Johnson | Disposed 2500 @ 205.21 | View | ||
| 2024-12-05 | Bradford T Nordholm | Disposed 5073 @ 213.37 | View | ||
| 2024-11-19 | Mitchell A Johnson | Disposed 1500 @ 204.69 | View | ||
| 2024-11-12 | Mitchell A Johnson | Disposed 1000 @ 211.1 | View | ||
| 2024-11-07 | Mitchell A Johnson | Disposed 1000 @ 208 | View | ||
| 2024-09-12 | Chester J Culver | Disposed 125 @ 184.46 | View | ||
| 2024-09-10 | Stephen P Mullery | Disposed 2472 @ 182.28 | View | ||
| 2024-09-06 | Sara Louise Faivre-Davis | Disposed 685 @ 184.55 | View | ||
| 2024-09-04 | Sara Louise Faivre-Davis | Disposed 685 @ 188.93 | View | ||
| 2024-08-15 | Todd P Ware | Acquired 67 @ 184.95 | View | ||
| 2024-03-31 | Everett M Dobrinski | Acquired 21 @ 101.62 | View |
Monitoring Federal Agricultural's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Federal |
Federal Agricultural's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Federal Agricultural's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Federal will maintain a workforce of about 190 employees by April 2025.Federal Agricultural Management Team Effectiveness
At this time, Federal Agricultural's Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 14th of March 2025, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.01, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.01. At this time, Federal Agricultural's Total Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 14th of March 2025, Other Assets is likely to grow to about 25.2 B, while Non Currrent Assets Other are likely to drop (140 M). Federal Agricultural's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Federal Agricultural manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Federal Agricultural Workforce Comparison
Federal Agricultural Mortgage is rated fifth in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Financials industry is presently estimated at about 58,626. Federal Agricultural adds roughly 191 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Financials industry.
Federal Agricultural Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.57 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.7 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.7 of operating income.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.79 | 0.91 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.85 | 0.8944 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.46 | 0.713 |
|
|
Federal Agricultural Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Federal Agricultural insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Federal Agricultural's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Federal Agricultural insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-01 | 3.75 | 45 | 12 | 58,827 | 50,910 |
| 2024-12-01 | 0.359 | 14 | 39 | 15,306 | 45,525 |
| 2024-09-01 | 1.2222 | 11 | 9 | 6,098 | 14,386 |
| 2024-06-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 1,043 | 280.00 |
| 2024-03-01 | 4.5455 | 50 | 11 | 35,438 | 9,773 |
| 2023-12-01 | 1.0 | 10 | 10 | 4,490 | 7,710 |
| 2023-09-01 | 1.0 | 9 | 9 | 4,241 | 15,245 |
| 2023-06-01 | 0.7619 | 16 | 21 | 9,430 | 16,081 |
| 2023-03-01 | 5.4444 | 49 | 9 | 56,879 | 9,010 |
| 2022-12-01 | 0.8 | 8 | 10 | 2,340 | 5,368 |
| 2022-09-01 | 1.25 | 10 | 8 | 10,460 | 10,218 |
| 2022-06-01 | 3.0 | 9 | 3 | 2,023 | 507.00 |
| 2022-03-01 | 3.1538 | 41 | 13 | 40,895 | 12,004 |
| 2021-06-01 | 0.7778 | 14 | 18 | 13,309 | 17,391 |
| 2021-03-01 | 0.4457 | 41 | 92 | 59,628 | 332,182 |
| 2020-12-01 | 0.0602 | 5 | 83 | 356.42 | 449,943 |
| 2020-09-01 | 0.3529 | 6 | 17 | 240.17 | 50,077 |
| 2020-06-01 | 0.6875 | 11 | 16 | 6,677 | 25,734 |
| 2020-03-01 | 3.4615 | 45 | 13 | 91,669 | 13,258 |
| 2019-12-01 | 3.0 | 6 | 2 | 707.00 | 0.00 |
| 2019-09-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 232.00 | 800.00 |
| 2019-06-01 | 1.1667 | 7 | 6 | 2,007 | 1,681 |
| 2019-03-01 | 7.8 | 39 | 5 | 57,074 | 10,530 |
| 2018-12-01 | 1.5 | 6 | 4 | 3,938 | 2,000 |
| 2018-09-01 | 1.25 | 5 | 4 | 3,062 | 6,000 |
| 2018-06-01 | 0.2381 | 15 | 63 | 30,782 | 73,058 |
| 2018-03-01 | 5.8333 | 35 | 6 | 34,777 | 15,434 |
| 2017-12-01 | 0.4545 | 5 | 11 | 14,222 | 33,696 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.25 | 6 | 24 | 25,655 | 65,281 |
| 2017-06-01 | 0.5455 | 6 | 11 | 3,567 | 9,738 |
| 2017-03-01 | 7.0 | 35 | 5 | 58,455 | 18,213 |
| 2016-12-01 | 0.2391 | 11 | 46 | 84,436 | 191,984 |
| 2016-09-01 | 0.2609 | 6 | 23 | 12,130 | 42,254 |
| 2016-06-01 | 0.6364 | 7 | 11 | 26,419 | 49,701 |
| 2016-03-01 | 8.5 | 34 | 4 | 111,204 | 16,528 |
| 2015-06-01 | 1.8261 | 42 | 23 | 184,661 | 156,710 |
| 2015-03-01 | 1.4286 | 10 | 7 | 25,383 | 11,163 |
| 2014-12-01 | 0.8333 | 5 | 6 | 3,327 | 7,244 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.5833 | 7 | 12 | 5,218 | 25,040 |
| 2014-06-01 | 18.5 | 37 | 2 | 89,238 | 2,500 |
| 2014-03-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 176.00 | 14,822 |
| 2013-12-01 | 0.28 | 7 | 25 | 26,437 | 74,001 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.32 | 8 | 25 | 25,209 | 91,192 |
| 2013-06-01 | 2.9333 | 44 | 15 | 138,166 | 54,637 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.4783 | 11 | 23 | 31,746 | 61,044 |
| 2012-12-01 | 0.3333 | 24 | 72 | 287,685 | 738,019 |
| 2012-09-01 | 0.1786 | 5 | 28 | 17,469 | 43,601 |
| 2012-06-01 | 0.9375 | 30 | 32 | 193,724 | 84,959 |
| 2012-03-01 | 0.2 | 2 | 10 | 113,606 | 57,015 |
| 2011-12-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 212.00 | 981.00 |
| 2011-09-01 | 0.8333 | 5 | 6 | 13,533 | 30,765 |
| 2011-06-01 | 2.1538 | 28 | 13 | 186,276 | 29,981 |
| 2011-03-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 457.00 | 2,432 |
| 2010-12-01 | 0.7143 | 5 | 7 | 5,449 | 23,220 |
| 2010-09-01 | 1.0 | 4 | 4 | 647.00 | 9,513 |
| 2010-06-01 | 3.3333 | 30 | 9 | 361,489 | 21,531 |
| 2010-03-01 | 5.0 | 5 | 1 | 1,114 | 15,500 |
| 2009-06-01 | 7.25 | 29 | 4 | 368,164 | 31,296 |
| 2008-12-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 2,356 | 78,000 |
| 2008-09-01 | 0.6 | 27 | 45 | 105,254 | 208,262 |
| 2008-06-01 | 1.2581 | 39 | 31 | 460,386 | 288,517 |
| 2007-12-01 | 1.6667 | 10 | 6 | 11,810 | 22,000 |
| 2007-09-01 | 0.7586 | 22 | 29 | 99,627 | 194,679 |
| 2007-06-01 | 0.8837 | 76 | 86 | 674,521 | 458,290 |
| 2007-03-01 | 1.1 | 11 | 10 | 4,614 | 26,144 |
| 2006-12-01 | 0.7143 | 20 | 28 | 76,644 | 232,200 |
| 2006-09-01 | 0.7105 | 27 | 38 | 101,375 | 186,630 |
| 2006-06-01 | 0.7313 | 49 | 67 | 423,115 | 234,808 |
| 2006-03-01 | 0.5 | 20 | 40 | 62,303 | 226,197 |
| 2005-12-01 | 1.6667 | 10 | 6 | 5,594 | 11,505 |
| 2005-09-01 | 0.4091 | 9 | 22 | 4,333 | 107,452 |
| 2005-06-01 | 4.4286 | 31 | 7 | 430,762 | 18,514 |
| 2005-03-01 | 0.4 | 8 | 20 | 852.00 | 100,000 |
| 2004-12-01 | 0.4615 | 12 | 26 | 20,639 | 103,346 |
| 2004-09-01 | 1.3571 | 19 | 14 | 249,654 | 70,000 |
| 2004-06-01 | 7.0 | 21 | 3 | 78,500 | 18,000 |
| 2004-03-01 | 1.875 | 15 | 8 | 9,978 | 18,382 |
| 2003-12-01 | 0.5534 | 57 | 103 | 222,294 | 506,594 |
Federal Agricultural Notable Stakeholders
A Federal Agricultural stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Federal Agricultural often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Federal Agricultural's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Federal Agricultural's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Bradford Nordholm | President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Myles Watts | Independent Vice Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Lowell Junkins | Independent Vice Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Aparna Ramesh | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer | Profile | |
| Brian Brinch | Senior Vice President – Business Strategy and Financial Research | Profile | |
| Stephen Mullery | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
| Eric McKissack | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Daniel Shaw | Independent Director | Profile | |
| LaJuana Wilcher | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Bruce Sherrick | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Charles Stones | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Mitchell Johnson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Richard Davidson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Dennis Brack | Independent Director | Profile | |
| James Engebretsen | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Amy Gales | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Robert Sexton | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Michelle Nichols | Director Compliance | Profile | |
| Todd Ware | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Sara Faivre | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Kerry Willie | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Marc Crady | Senior Vice President – Chief Credit Officer | Profile | |
| W Hemingway | Director | Profile | |
| Zachary Carpenter | Executive Vice President Chief Business Officer | Profile | |
| Roy Tiarks | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Jalpa Nazareth | Director Strategy | Profile | |
| Megan MurrayPelaez | Director Communications | Profile | |
| Lisa Meyer | Vice Communications | Profile | |
| Gregory Ramsey | Controller VP | Profile | |
| Everett Dobrinski | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Sean Datcher | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Robert Maines | Senior Vice President – Operations | Profile |
About Federal Agricultural Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Federal Agricultural often depends on how effective the management is. Federal Agricultural management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Federal management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Federal management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.12 | 0.13 |
Federal Agricultural Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Federal Agricultural use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Federal Agricultural within its industry.Federal Agricultural Manpower Efficiency
Return on Federal Agricultural Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 1.9M | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 11.3M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 1.1M | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 6.5M |
Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Federal Agricultural Mortgage. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in price. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.
Is Commercial & Residential Mortgage Finance space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Federal Agricultural. If investors know Federal will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Federal Agricultural listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.236 | Dividend Share 5.6 | Earnings Share 16.45 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.156 |
The market value of Federal Agricultural is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Federal that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Federal Agricultural's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Federal Agricultural's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Federal Agricultural's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Federal Agricultural's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Federal Agricultural's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Federal Agricultural is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Federal Agricultural's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.