Smith AO Company Insiders
AOS Stock | USD 71.81 0.41 0.57% |
Smith AO's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Smith AO stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. Smith AO employs about 12 K people. The company is managed by 37 executives with a total tenure of roughly 236 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 324.32 employees per reported executive.
Ajita Rajendra Chairman Chairman, CEO and President and Member of Investment Policy Committee |
Helen Gurholt President Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller |
Smith AO's Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-11-08 | Jared Moskowitz | Disposed @ 74.86 | |||
2024-08-07 | Samuel M Carver | Disposed 14705 @ 81 | View | ||
2024-03-05 | Robert J Heideman | Disposed 9890 @ 84.63 | View | ||
2024-03-04 | Ajita G Rajendra | Disposed 60258 @ 84.51 | View | ||
2024-02-29 | Ajita G Rajendra | Disposed 24669 @ 83.02 | View | ||
2024-02-07 | Idelle K Wolf | Disposed 814 @ 80 | View |
Monitoring Smith AO's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Smith |
Smith AO's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Smith AO's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Smith will maintain a workforce of slightly above 12000 employees by February 2025.Smith AO's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Smith AO, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Smith AO by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2024-12-09 | Representative Jared Moskowitz | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2024-12-06 | Representative Ro Khanna | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2024-08-21 | Representative Jared Moskowitz | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2018-12-11 | Representative Greg Gianforte | Acquired $50K to $100K | Verify |
Smith AO Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.1434 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.1434 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2954 %, implying that it generated $0.2954 on every 100 dollars invested. Smith AO's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Smith AO manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Smith AO's Return On Tangible Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Capital Employed is likely to gain to 0.32 in 2025, whereas Return On Assets are likely to drop 0.16 in 2025. At this time, Smith AO's Total Current Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to gain to 0.23 in 2025, whereas Total Assets are likely to drop slightly above 1.9 B in 2025.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to gain to about 148.3 M in 2025, whereas Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to drop slightly above 206.2 M in 2025.
Smith AO Workforce Comparison
Smith AO is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is presently estimated at about 454,320. Smith AO holds roughly 12,000 in number of employees claiming about 2.64% of equities under Industrials industry.
Smith AO Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.14 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.18 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.18 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.2 | 0.35 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.13 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.19 | 0.18 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.18 | 0.17 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.16 | 0.1732 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.29 | 0.27 |
|
|
Smith AO Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Smith AO insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Smith AO's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Smith AO insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-09-01 | 0.3846 | 5 | 13 | 37,380 | 81,323 |
2024-06-01 | 1.125 | 9 | 8 | 14,634 | 22,880 |
2024-03-01 | 0.9167 | 33 | 36 | 349,525 | 401,836 |
2023-12-01 | 0.4762 | 10 | 21 | 642,951 | 548,812 |
2023-09-01 | 0.25 | 2 | 8 | 22,470 | 57,029 |
2023-06-01 | 2.2 | 11 | 5 | 23,419 | 11,534 |
2023-03-01 | 0.9063 | 29 | 32 | 231,053 | 246,423 |
2022-06-01 | 1.0833 | 13 | 12 | 36,526 | 25,147 |
2022-03-01 | 1.6071 | 45 | 28 | 319,415 | 99,144 |
2021-12-01 | 0.3023 | 13 | 43 | 581,963 | 929,961 |
2021-09-01 | 3.6667 | 11 | 3 | 50,207 | 50,770 |
2021-06-01 | 0.8684 | 33 | 38 | 275,130 | 561,472 |
2021-03-01 | 0.8429 | 59 | 70 | 480,284 | 676,337 |
2020-12-01 | 0.2692 | 7 | 26 | 244,100 | 542,988 |
2020-09-01 | 0.3333 | 2 | 6 | 7,665 | 58,834 |
2020-06-01 | 1.1111 | 10 | 9 | 171,143 | 304,565 |
2020-03-01 | 1.3636 | 45 | 33 | 669,140 | 86,566 |
2019-09-01 | 2.0 | 10 | 5 | 64,095 | 338,861 |
2019-06-01 | 1.1765 | 20 | 17 | 69,488 | 116,503 |
2019-03-01 | 1.3171 | 54 | 41 | 558,912 | 183,801 |
2018-09-01 | 0.8 | 4 | 5 | 41,340 | 74,792 |
2018-06-01 | 0.9333 | 14 | 15 | 32,082 | 127,983 |
2018-03-01 | 1.1667 | 56 | 48 | 438,060 | 350,537 |
2017-12-01 | 0.3571 | 15 | 42 | 260,705 | 533,346 |
2017-06-01 | 0.6774 | 21 | 31 | 221,631 | 454,116 |
2017-03-01 | 1.0851 | 51 | 47 | 580,186 | 628,285 |
2016-12-01 | 0.2667 | 4 | 15 | 11,191 | 69,628 |
2016-09-01 | 1.8333 | 11 | 6 | 7,794 | 27,510 |
2016-06-01 | 0.75 | 21 | 28 | 132,256 | 298,319 |
2016-03-01 | 1.3438 | 43 | 32 | 312,585 | 213,844 |
2015-12-01 | 0.3333 | 11 | 33 | 97,367 | 214,225 |
2015-09-01 | 3.25 | 13 | 4 | 121,576 | 240,100 |
2015-06-01 | 5.0 | 10 | 2 | 16,890 | 10,103 |
2015-03-01 | 1.1429 | 64 | 56 | 538,579 | 707,687 |
2014-12-01 | 0.3333 | 3 | 9 | 18,733 | 54,396 |
2014-09-01 | 0.3333 | 2 | 6 | 25,200 | 130,400 |
2014-06-01 | 2.0 | 14 | 7 | 45,652 | 53,940 |
2014-03-01 | 1.5135 | 56 | 37 | 405,761 | 172,381 |
2013-12-01 | 0.4 | 10 | 25 | 70,217 | 208,803 |
2013-09-01 | 0.4815 | 13 | 27 | 93,954 | 242,630 |
2013-06-01 | 3.0 | 9 | 3 | 12,375 | 16,400 |
2013-03-01 | 1.2381 | 52 | 42 | 314,083 | 291,315 |
2012-12-01 | 0.3143 | 11 | 35 | 310,295 | 846,585 |
2012-09-01 | 0.3214 | 9 | 28 | 22,546 | 45,794 |
2012-06-01 | 0.122 | 15 | 123 | 114,550 | 203,924 |
2012-03-01 | 0.209 | 42 | 201 | 460,850 | 518,695 |
2011-03-01 | 0.1387 | 52 | 375 | 564,948 | 607,306 |
2010-12-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 763.00 | 8,100 |
2010-09-01 | 0.0233 | 3 | 129 | 15,000 | 125,126 |
2010-03-01 | 1.7059 | 29 | 17 | 209,683 | 64,799 |
2009-12-01 | 0.0419 | 9 | 215 | 139,250 | 283,997 |
2009-09-01 | 0.0638 | 6 | 94 | 267,175 | 625,150 |
2009-06-01 | 1.7778 | 16 | 9 | 946,555 | 1,521,370 |
2009-03-01 | 10.5 | 21 | 2 | 336,000 | 29,495 |
2008-12-01 | 0.3429 | 12 | 35 | 152,200 | 164,310 |
2008-06-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 17,334 | 17,222 |
2008-03-01 | 22.0 | 22 | 1 | 198,300 | 0.77 |
2007-09-01 | 0.0776 | 9 | 116 | 210,481 | 416,190 |
2007-06-01 | 0.25 | 19 | 76 | 116,408 | 182,100 |
2007-03-01 | 0.4915 | 29 | 59 | 229,650 | 98,660 |
2006-12-01 | 0.6 | 6 | 10 | 29,289 | 75,706 |
2006-09-01 | 7.0 | 7 | 1 | 4,655 | 1,418 |
2006-06-01 | 0.3243 | 12 | 37 | 85,761 | 156,257 |
2006-03-01 | 0.1146 | 11 | 96 | 385,450 | 698,500 |
2005-12-01 | 1.6818 | 37 | 22 | 557,393 | 589,800 |
2005-09-01 | 0.2857 | 2 | 7 | 184,200 | 347,599 |
2005-06-01 | 0.8 | 12 | 15 | 52,520 | 93,700 |
2005-03-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 41,926 | 0.00 |
2004-12-01 | 4.875 | 39 | 8 | 428,200 | 153,911 |
2004-09-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 130,825 | 158,322 |
2004-06-01 | 1.7778 | 16 | 9 | 29,612 | 12,750 |
2004-03-01 | 1.2222 | 11 | 9 | 178,711 | 48,400 |
2003-12-01 | 8.0 | 24 | 3 | 325,900 | 8,177 |
2003-09-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 47,000 | 23,500 |
Smith AO Notable Stakeholders
A Smith AO stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Smith AO often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Smith AO's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Smith AO's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Ajita Rajendra | Chairman, CEO and President and Member of Investment Policy Committee | Profile | |
Helen Gurholt | Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | Profile | |
Daniel Kempken | Senior Vice President - Corporate Development and Strategy | Profile | |
Peter Martineau | Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer | Profile | |
Wallace Goodwin | Senior Vice President and Presidentident and General Manager – Lochinvar, LLC | Profile | |
Paul Dana | Senior Vice President – Global Operations | Profile | |
Anindadeb DasGupta | Senior Vice President and Presidentident – A. O. Smith Holdings (Barbados) SRL | Profile | |
Samuel Karge | President - North Americawater Treatment Business Unit | Profile | |
S Scheppele | Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer | Profile | |
David Warren | Senior Vice President, President and General Manager - North America Water Heater | Profile | |
Charles Lauber | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Mark Petrarca | Senior Vice President - Human Resources and Public Affairs | Profile | |
Kevin Wheeler | Sr. VP and President of North America, India, Europe and Export | Profile | |
Robert Heideman | Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer | Profile | |
Stephen Shafer | President COO | Profile | |
Patricia Ackerman | Senior Vice President – Investor Relations, Treasurer and Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability | Profile | |
James Stern | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
Gene Wulf | Independent Director | Profile | |
Bruce Smith | Presiding Independent Director | Profile | |
Paul Jones | Independent Director | Profile | |
Ronald Brown | Presiding Independent Director | Profile | |
Mark Smith | Independent Director | Profile | |
Idelle Wolf | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Greubel | Presiding Independent Director | Profile | |
Ilham Kadri | Independent Director | Profile | |
James JD | General VP | Profile | |
Noelle PE | Social Environmental | Profile | |
Samuel Carver | Senior Vice President - Global Operations | Profile | |
Victoria Holt | Independent Director | Profile | |
Michael Larsen | Independent Director | Profile | |
Jack Qiu | Senior Vice President - A. O. Smith China | Profile | |
Earl Exum | Independent Director | Profile | |
Melissa Scheppele | Senior Officer | Profile | |
Parag Kulkarni | Senior International | Profile | |
D Karge | Senior Vice President and Presidentident – North America Water Treatment | Profile | |
Curt Selby | Senior Affairs | Profile | |
Darrell Schuh | Senior LLC | Profile |
About Smith AO Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Smith AO often depends on how effective the management is. Smith AO management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Smith management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Smith management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.22 | 0.23 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.30 | 0.32 | |
Return On Assets | 0.17 | 0.16 | |
Return On Equity | 0.27 | 0.29 |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Smith AO's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Smith AO. Check Smith AO's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Smith AO's management manipulating its earnings.
Smith AO Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Smith AO use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Smith AO within its industry.Smith AO Manpower Efficiency
Return on Smith AO Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 321.1K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 104.1M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 46.4K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 15M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 46.2K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 15M |
Additional Tools for Smith Stock Analysis
When running Smith AO's price analysis, check to measure Smith AO's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Smith AO is operating at the current time. Most of Smith AO's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Smith AO's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Smith AO's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Smith AO to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.