ATS P Company Executives
| ATS Stock | 38.78 0.22 0.56% |
ATS P employs about 7.5 K people. The company is managed by 24 executives with a total tenure of roughly 17500 years, averaging almost 729.0 years of service per executive, having 312.5 employees per reported executive. Analysis of ATS P's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
ATS |
ATS P Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0127 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0127 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. ATS P's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well ATS P manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 26th of December 2025, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to -0.01. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0. At this time, ATS P's Debt To Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 26th of December 2025, Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 0.96, while Non Currrent Assets Other are likely to drop about 10.2 M.As of the 26th of December 2025, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 83.1 M. In addition to that, Net Loss is likely to grow to about (26.6 M)
ATS P Workforce Comparison
ATS P is rated second in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is presently estimated at about 97,112. ATS P holds roughly 7,500 in number of employees claiming about 8% of equities under Industrials industry.
ATS P Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. ATS P Price Series Summation is a cross summation of ATS P price series and its benchmark/peer.
ATS P Notable Stakeholders
An ATS P stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as ATS P often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. ATS P's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting ATS P's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Christian Debus | President Solutions | Profile | |
| Jeremy Patten | President Technology | Profile | |
| Miroslav Kafedzhiev | President Automation | Profile | |
| Chris Hart | President Sciences | Profile | |
| Udo Panenka | President Automation | Profile | |
| Simon Roberts | President Technology | Profile | |
| Simone Volpi | Comecer Director | Profile | |
| Stewart McCuaig | General VP | Profile | |
| Cleland Fiona | SVP Development | Profile | |
| Giuseppe Tassone | Vice Acquisitions | Profile | |
| David CFA | Head Relations | Profile | |
| Arjun CFA | Investor Associate | Profile | |
| Steve Emery | Vice Procurement | Profile | |
| Prakash Mahesh | Group Sciences | Profile | |
| Jeffrey Adamson | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Joe Metri | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Anne Cybulsk | Interim Officer | Profile | |
| Andrew Hider | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Angella Alexander | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Cameron Moyer | Vice ABM | Profile | |
| Michael Cybulski | Interim Officer | Profile | |
| Ryan McLeod | Interim Officer | Profile | |
| David MBA | Head Relations | Profile | |
| Gordon Raman | Chief Officer | Profile |
About ATS P Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as ATS P often depends on how effective the management is. ATS P management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of ATS management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the ATS management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Return On Assets | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Return On Equity | (0.02) | (0.02) |
ATS P Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as ATS P use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare ATS P within its industry.ATS P Manpower Efficiency
Return on ATS P Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 337.8K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 105.6M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 3.7K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 1.2M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 104K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 32.5M |
Other Information on Investing in ATS Stock
ATS P financial ratios help investors to determine whether ATS Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in ATS with respect to the benefits of owning ATS P security.