Cascadia Minerals Company Insiders
| CAM Stock | 0.19 0.01 5.56% |
Cascadia Minerals employs about 4 people. The company is managed by 4 executives with a total tenure of roughly 0 years, averaging almost 0.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Recap of Cascadia Minerals' management performance can provide insight into the venture performance.
Cascadia |
Cascadia Minerals Workforce Comparison
Cascadia Minerals is currently under evaluation in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Materials industry is currently estimated at about 80.0. Cascadia Minerals adds roughly 0.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of all equities under Materials industry.
Cascadia Minerals Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Cascadia Minerals Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Cascadia Minerals price series and its benchmark/peer.
Cascadia Minerals Notable Stakeholders
A Cascadia Minerals stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Cascadia Minerals often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Cascadia Minerals' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Cascadia Minerals' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Graham Downs | CEO President | Profile | |
| Thomas PGeo | Vice Exploration | Profile | |
| Shayla Forster | Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
| Andrew PEng | Vice Development | Profile |
About Cascadia Minerals Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Cascadia Minerals often depends on how effective the management is. Cascadia Minerals management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Cascadia management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Cascadia management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (1.80) | (1.89) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | (1.89) | (1.98) | |
| Return On Assets | (1.80) | (1.89) | |
| Return On Equity | (2.00) | (2.10) |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Cascadia Minerals' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Cascadia Minerals. Check Cascadia Minerals' Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Cascadia Minerals' management manipulating its earnings.
Cascadia Minerals Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Cascadia Minerals use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Cascadia Minerals within its industry.Cascadia Minerals Manpower Efficiency
Return on Cascadia Minerals Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 0.0 | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 0.0 | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 1.1M | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 1.1M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 317.8K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 317.8K |
Additional Tools for Cascadia Stock Analysis
When running Cascadia Minerals' price analysis, check to measure Cascadia Minerals' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Cascadia Minerals is operating at the current time. Most of Cascadia Minerals' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Cascadia Minerals' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Cascadia Minerals' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Cascadia Minerals to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.