Cheniere Energy Company Insiders
CQP Stock | USD 63.29 1.71 2.78% |
Cheniere Energy employs about 28 people. The company is managed by 28 executives with a total tenure of roughly 137 years, averaging almost 4.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Discussion of Cheniere Energy's management performance can provide insight into the enterprise performance.
Jack Fusco Chairman Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |
Eric Bensaude President Senior Vice President - Commercial Operations, Director of General Partner |
Cheniere |
Cheniere Energy's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Cheniere Energy's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Cheniere will maintain a workforce of slightly above 380 employees by March 2025.Cheniere Energy Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.1258 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.1258 of profit. This is way below average. Cheniere Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Cheniere Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 01/31/2025, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.22. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.29. At this time, Cheniere Energy's Total Current Liabilities is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 01/31/2025, Non Current Liabilities Other is likely to grow to about 118.3 M, while Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to drop slightly above 11.3 B.As of 01/31/2025, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to grow to about 3 B, while Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop slightly above 339.1 M.
Cheniere Energy Workforce Comparison
Cheniere Energy Partners is currently under evaluation in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Energy industry is currently estimated at about 26,399. Cheniere Energy adds roughly 0.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Energy industry.
Cheniere Energy Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.31 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.4 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.4 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.67 | 0.74 |
|
|
Cheniere Energy Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Cheniere Energy insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Cheniere Energy's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Cheniere Energy insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-06-01 | 1.0 | 5 | 5 | 6,000 | 3,375 |
2023-12-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 6,000 | 4,500 |
2023-09-01 | 0.6429 | 9 | 14 | 11,250 | 8,625 |
2023-06-01 | 1.4444 | 13 | 9 | 41,088 | 23,407 |
2023-03-01 | 12.0 | 48 | 4 | 764,652 | 125,568 |
2022-12-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 6,000 | 4,500 |
2022-09-01 | 0.7143 | 5 | 7 | 6,000 | 4,500 |
2022-06-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 3,000 | 4,200 |
2021-12-01 | 1.1 | 11 | 10 | 43,892 | 23,446 |
2021-09-01 | 2.15 | 43 | 20 | 274,050 | 39,667 |
2021-06-01 | 0.3529 | 6 | 17 | 26,324 | 65,472 |
2021-03-01 | 1.5 | 6 | 4 | 169,700 | 1,010,694 |
2020-12-01 | 1.6154 | 21 | 13 | 585,564 | 300,582 |
2020-09-01 | 0.6316 | 12 | 19 | 270,779,662 | 453,403,696 |
2020-06-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 6,000 | 4,500 |
2019-12-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 6,000 | 4,500 |
2019-09-01 | 0.7857 | 11 | 14 | 12,001 | 7,876 |
2019-06-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 6,000 | 4,500 |
2018-12-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 6,000 | 4,500 |
2018-09-01 | 0.9091 | 10 | 11 | 12,000 | 7,125 |
2018-06-01 | 0.7143 | 5 | 7 | 6,000 | 4,125 |
2017-12-01 | 3.125 | 25 | 8 | 2,745,622 | 4,500 |
2017-09-01 | 0.9286 | 13 | 14 | 689,473,089 | 345,340,459 |
2017-06-01 | 0.5714 | 4 | 7 | 5,250 | 4,500 |
2016-12-01 | 0.5556 | 5 | 9 | 8,250 | 10,125 |
2016-09-01 | 0.8182 | 9 | 11 | 15,750 | 14,250 |
2016-06-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 4,500 | 4,125 |
2015-12-01 | 0.8333 | 5 | 6 | 11,500 | 8,250 |
2015-09-01 | 0.875 | 7 | 8 | 14,250 | 12,750 |
2015-06-01 | 0.4 | 2 | 5 | 3,750 | 3,750 |
2014-12-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 6,750 | 7,125 |
2014-09-01 | 1.0 | 7 | 7 | 14,250 | 11,625 |
2014-06-01 | 0.2857 | 2 | 7 | 3,750 | 9,967,605 |
2013-12-01 | 0.2857 | 2 | 7 | 6,000 | 54,241,734 |
2013-09-01 | 0.6667 | 4 | 6 | 12,000 | 12,000 |
2013-06-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 12,003,750 | 53,750 |
2012-12-01 | 2.0 | 6 | 3 | 166,000 | 9,000 |
2012-09-01 | 0.7 | 7 | 10 | 22,255,973 | 18,000 |
2012-06-01 | 0.5789 | 11 | 19 | 11,132,111 | 18,000 |
2011-09-01 | 1.0 | 5 | 5 | 1,078,881 | 6,000 |
2011-06-01 | 0.75 | 12 | 16 | 27,000 | 21,000 |
2010-12-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 6,750 | 4,500 |
2010-09-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 6,750 | 4,500 |
2010-06-01 | 0.8333 | 10 | 12 | 25,500 | 22,500 |
2009-12-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 6,000 | 7,740 |
2009-09-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 6,000 | 6,000 |
2009-06-01 | 1.5 | 12 | 8 | 87,500 | 12,000 |
2009-03-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 6,000 | 6,000 |
2008-12-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 88,846 | 60,000 |
2008-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 12,000 | 0.00 |
2008-06-01 | 0.3333 | 5 | 15 | 10,903,357 | 152,000 |
2008-03-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 135,232 | 0.00 |
2007-06-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 26,007 | 4,050,000 |
2007-03-01 | 0.7273 | 8 | 11 | 42,968,886 | 16,891,672 |
Cheniere Energy Notable Stakeholders
A Cheniere Energy stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Cheniere Energy often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Cheniere Energy's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Cheniere Energy's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Jack Fusco | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner | Profile | |
Zach Davis | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Director of the General Partner | Profile | |
Eric Bensaude | Senior Vice President - Commercial Operations, Director of General Partner | Profile | |
Corey Grindal | COO VP | Profile | |
JohnPaul Munfa | Director of the General Partner | Profile | |
Vincent Pagano | Independent Director of the General Partner | Profile | |
Jamie Welch | Director of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the General Partner | Profile | |
Michael Wortley | CFO of Cheniere Energy Partners GP LLC, Sr. VP of Cheniere Energy Partners GP LLC and Director of Cheniere Energy Partners GP LLC | Profile | |
James Ball | Independent Director of the General Partner | Profile | |
Philip Meier | Director of the General Partner | Profile | |
Oliver Richard | Independent Director of the General Partner | Profile | |
Ellis McCain | Independent Director of the General Partner | Profile | |
Anatol Feygin | Chief VP | Profile | |
Taylor Johnson | Deputy VP | Profile | |
Sean JD | Chief VP | Profile | |
Wallace Henderson | Director of the General Partner | Profile | |
Brandon Smith | VP LLC | Profile | |
Sean Markowitz | Chief VP | Profile | |
Hilary Ware | Chief LLC | Profile | |
Oliver Tuckerman | VP LLC | Profile | |
Scott Peak | Director of the General Partner | Profile | |
Randy Bhatia | Vice LLC | Profile | |
David Slack | LLC GP | Profile | |
Eben BurnhamSnyder | Vice LLC | Profile | |
Deanna Newcomb | Chief LLC | Profile | |
Aaron Stephenson | Senior Vice President Operations, Director | Profile | |
Tom Bullis | Executive LLC | Profile | |
Mark Murski | Director of the General Partner | Profile |
About Cheniere Energy Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Cheniere Energy Partners often depends on how effective the management is. Cheniere Energy management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Cheniere management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Cheniere management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.21 | 0.22 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.27 | 0.29 | |
Return On Assets | 0.21 | 0.22 | |
Return On Equity | 4.53 | 4.76 |
Cheniere Energy Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Cheniere Energy use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Cheniere Energy within its industry.Cheniere Energy Manpower Efficiency
Return on Cheniere Energy Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 345.1M | |
Revenue Per Executive | 345.1M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 151.9M | |
Net Income Per Executive | 151.9M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 535.7K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 535.7K |
Additional Tools for Cheniere Stock Analysis
When running Cheniere Energy's price analysis, check to measure Cheniere Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Cheniere Energy is operating at the current time. Most of Cheniere Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Cheniere Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Cheniere Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Cheniere Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.