Dana Company Leadership
| DAN Stock | USD 25.03 0.08 0.32% |
Dana employs about 28 K people. The company is managed by 38 executives with a total tenure of roughly 190 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 736.84 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Dana's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Keith Wandell Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
| James Kamsickas Chairman Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer |
Dana's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Dana's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Dana will maintain a workforce of about 36000 employees by February 2026.Dana Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.034 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.034 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0531 %, implying that it generated $0.0531 on every 100 dollars invested. Dana's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Dana manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 5th of January 2026, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to -0.0088. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to -0.0058. At this time, Dana's Other Current Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 5th of January 2026, Intangible Assets is likely to grow to about 263.4 M, while Total Assets are likely to drop about 7 B.As of the 5th of January 2026, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 148.1 M. In addition to that, Net Loss is likely to grow to about (48.7 M)The majority of Dana Inc outstanding shares are owned by other corporate entities. These outside corporations are usually referred to as non-private investors looking to obtain positions in Dana Inc to benefit from reduced commissions. Consequently, institutional investors are subject to a different set of regulations than regular investors in Dana. Please pay attention to any change in the institutional holdings of Dana Inc as this could imply that something significant has changed or is about to change at the company.
Shares in Circulation | First Issued 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 143.8 M | Current Value 139.2 M | Avarage Shares Outstanding 134.6 M | Quarterly Volatility 34.4 M |
Dana Workforce Comparison
Dana Inc is rated # 3 in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is currently estimated at about 231,250. Dana retains roughly 28,000 in number of employees claiming about 12% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Dana Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.01 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.04 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.04 of operating income.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.098 |
|
|
Dana Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Dana insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Dana's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Dana insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-01 | 0.2143 | 3 | 14 | 1,242,478 | 1,793,801 |
| 2025-09-01 | 0.5161 | 16 | 31 | 51,375 | 41,666 |
| 2025-03-01 | 1.1067 | 83 | 75 | 726,957 | 472,409 |
| 2024-09-01 | 8.0 | 16 | 2 | 69,456 | 1,373 |
| 2024-06-01 | 1.2857 | 18 | 14 | 11,496 | 8,274 |
| 2024-03-01 | 1.0707 | 106 | 99 | 1,395,911 | 720,626 |
| 2023-12-01 | 2.1818 | 24 | 11 | 25,592 | 23,026 |
| 2023-09-01 | 1.8889 | 17 | 9 | 15,422 | 44,920 |
| 2023-06-01 | 6.0 | 18 | 3 | 9,010 | 3,400 |
| 2023-03-01 | 1.0952 | 92 | 84 | 1,168,568 | 911,550 |
| 2022-12-01 | 1.4706 | 25 | 17 | 25,823 | 456,151 |
| 2022-06-01 | 5.3333 | 16 | 3 | 5,966 | 8,317 |
| 2022-03-01 | 1.4127 | 89 | 63 | 921,928 | 603,864 |
| 2021-12-01 | 1.1111 | 20 | 18 | 27,429 | 56,907 |
| 2021-09-01 | 18.0 | 18 | 1 | 5,337 | 57.00 |
| 2021-06-01 | 17.0 | 17 | 1 | 4,419 | 46,500 |
| 2021-03-01 | 1.4118 | 72 | 51 | 750,672 | 486,233 |
| 2020-12-01 | 0.4 | 2 | 5 | 1,647 | 37,925 |
| 2020-09-01 | 0.0303 | 1 | 33 | 558.00 | 37,500 |
| 2020-06-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 451.00 | 1,785 |
| 2020-03-01 | 1.4902 | 76 | 51 | 1,561,580 | 705,952 |
| 2019-12-01 | 1.0 | 17 | 17 | 9,163 | 84,913 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.3902 | 16 | 41 | 7,384 | 57,129 |
| 2019-06-01 | 16.0 | 16 | 1 | 5,833 | 2,825 |
| 2019-03-01 | 1.4375 | 69 | 48 | 1,119,057 | 650,096 |
| 2018-12-01 | 7.5 | 15 | 2 | 6,219 | 231.00 |
| 2018-09-01 | 3.8 | 19 | 5 | 282,572 | 274,775 |
| 2018-06-01 | 0.2361 | 17 | 72 | 56,041 | 125,253 |
| 2018-03-01 | 0.7129 | 72 | 101 | 600,690 | 371,824 |
| 2017-12-01 | 0.1623 | 25 | 154 | 171,312 | 509,250 |
| 2017-09-01 | 9.5 | 19 | 2 | 151,593 | 109,589 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2.0 | 18 | 9 | 9,522 | 23,557 |
| 2017-03-01 | 0.4545 | 65 | 143 | 660,209 | 642,731 |
| 2016-12-01 | 1.6364 | 18 | 11 | 5,058 | 8,378 |
| 2016-09-01 | 3.4 | 17 | 5 | 220,761 | 176,458 |
| 2016-03-01 | 1.2195 | 50 | 41 | 702,478 | 233,918 |
| 2015-06-01 | 5.125 | 41 | 8 | 22,232 | 47,312 |
| 2015-03-01 | 0.7794 | 53 | 68 | 673,209 | 383,482 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.2759 | 16 | 58 | 52,559 | 130,000 |
| 2014-06-01 | 9.6667 | 29 | 3 | 82,178 | 114,867 |
| 2014-03-01 | 0.9091 | 40 | 44 | 349,495 | 203,342 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.4107 | 23 | 56 | 146,541 | 336,972 |
| 2013-06-01 | 1.4762 | 31 | 21 | 245,620 | 380,192 |
| 2013-03-01 | 1.875 | 45 | 24 | 709,582 | 69,178 |
| 2012-12-01 | 4.25 | 17 | 4 | 6,812 | 4,918 |
| 2012-09-01 | 14.0 | 14 | 1 | 3,350 | 1,377 |
| 2012-06-01 | 0.5714 | 20 | 35 | 244,929 | 364,820 |
| 2012-03-01 | 3.5 | 35 | 10 | 855,354 | 49,175 |
| 2011-12-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 14,866 | 20,650 |
| 2011-09-01 | 1.6 | 16 | 10 | 75,534 | 94,549 |
| 2011-06-01 | 0.9667 | 29 | 30 | 728,025 | 337,995 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.5977 | 52 | 87 | 722,363 | 362,233 |
| 2010-12-01 | 0.2353 | 12 | 51 | 779,775 | 1,256,659 |
| 2010-09-01 | 0.0909 | 9 | 99 | 687,152 | 1,067,840 |
| 2010-06-01 | 0.082 | 10 | 122 | 398,919 | 428,438 |
| 2010-03-01 | 0.625 | 40 | 64 | 656,076 | 420,196 |
| 2009-12-01 | 1.4 | 21 | 15 | 307,998 | 228,733 |
| 2009-09-01 | 2.0 | 6 | 3 | 1,767,703 | 57,703 |
| 2009-06-01 | 0.1667 | 1 | 6 | 14,648 | 296,529 |
| 2009-03-01 | 6.2 | 31 | 5 | 1,720,384 | 6,624 |
| 2008-09-01 | 3.5 | 7 | 2 | 218,276 | 0.00 |
| 2008-06-01 | 4.5 | 18 | 4 | 1,626,467 | 0.00 |
| 2008-03-01 | 6.5 | 39 | 6 | 1,010,360 | 3,097 |
Dana Notable Stakeholders
A Dana stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Dana often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Dana's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Dana's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Keith Wandell | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| James Kamsickas | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Christophe Dominiak | Senior Vice President CTO | Profile | |
| Dwayne Matthews | President of Power Technologies | Profile | |
| Byron Foster | Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial, Marketing, and Communications Officer, President, Light Vehicle Drive Systems | Profile | |
| Aziz Aghili | Executive Vice President, President, Off-Highway Drive and Motion Technologies | Profile | |
| Douglas Liedberg | Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer, General Counsel, Company Secretary | Profile | |
| Jonathan Collins | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Robert Pyle | Executive Vice President, President, Light Vehicle Drive Systems | Profile | |
| Matthew Fahnestock | CIO, Vice President | Profile | |
| James Kellett | Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
| Timothy Kraus | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
| Antonio Valencia | President - Power Technologies and Senior Vice President - Global Electrification | Profile | |
| Timothy CPA | Senior CFO | Profile | |
| Seth Metzger | Senior CTO | Profile | |
| Richard Dyer | Director Reporting | Profile | |
| Virginia Kamsky | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Raymond Mabus | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Ernesto Hernandez | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Rachel Gonzalez | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Michael Mack | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Douglas JD | General VP | Profile | |
| John Geddes | VP Treasurer | Profile | |
| Ryan Laskey | Senior Vice President - Commercial Vehicle Drive and Motion Systems | Profile | |
| Craig Barber | Director Planning | Profile | |
| Brett Icahn | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Kevin Williams | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Diarmuid OConnell | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Andrea Siudara | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Chris Clark | Senior Vice President - Global Operations | Profile | |
| Maureen Pittenger | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Brian Pour | Senior Systems | Profile | |
| R McDonald | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Craig Price | Senior Development | Profile | |
| Kevin Biddle | Vice Controller | Profile | |
| Gary Hu | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Bridget Karlin | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Lisa Amend | Senior Officer | Profile |
About Dana Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Dana Inc often depends on how effective the management is. Dana management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Dana management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Dana management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Return On Assets | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Return On Equity | (0.04) | (0.04) |
Dana Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Dana use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Dana within its industry.Dana Manpower Efficiency
Return on Dana Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 367.3K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 270.6M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 1.8K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 1.3M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 40.8K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 30.1M |
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Dana Inc. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.
Is Automotive Parts & Equipment space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Dana. If investors know Dana will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Dana listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 22.046 | Dividend Share 0.4 | Earnings Share 0.44 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.011 |
The market value of Dana Inc is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Dana that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Dana's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Dana's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Dana's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Dana's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Dana's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Dana is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Dana's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.