Designer Brands Company Top Insiders
| DBI Stock | USD 4.89 0.23 4.94% |
Designer Brands' insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of current insiders' outlook of investing in Designer Brands suggests that almost all insiders are panicking regarding Designer Brands' prospects. Designer Brands employs about 14 K people. The company is managed by 28 executives with a total tenure of roughly 167 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 500.0 employees per reported executive.
| Roger Rawlins CEO Chief Executive Officer, Director, Interim President - DSW |
| Simon Nankervis CEO Executive Vice President and President, CEO and Chief Commercial Officer of Camuto LLC d/b/a/ Camuto Group |
Designer Brands' Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2024-10-11 | Mark Haley | Disposed 25787 @ 6.04 | View | ||
| 2024-09-17 | Harvey L Sonnenberg | Disposed 22000 @ 6.62 | View | ||
| 2024-04-11 | Harvey L Sonnenberg | Disposed 9000 @ 8.65 | View | ||
| 2024-04-08 | Jared A Poff | Disposed 15000 @ 9.76 | View | ||
| 2024-03-27 | Mark Haley | Disposed 16125 @ 10.84 | View | ||
| 2023-12-04 | Deborah L Ferree | Disposed 34000 @ 12.58 | View |
Monitoring Designer Brands' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Designer |
Designer Brands' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Designer Brands' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Designer will maintain a workforce of under 14000 employees by December 2024.Designer Brands Management Team Effectiveness
The Designer Brands' current Return On Tangible Assets is estimated to increase to 0.11. The Designer Brands' current Return On Capital Employed is estimated to increase to 0.21. As of now, Designer Brands' Return On Tangible Assets are decreasing as compared to previous years. The Designer Brands' current Fixed Asset Turnover is estimated to increase to 7.39, while Total Assets are projected to decrease to under 1.2 B. Designer Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Designer Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.The Designer Brands' current Common Stock Shares Outstanding is estimated to increase to about 79.8 M. The Designer Brands' current Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is estimated to increase to about 153.7 M
Designer Brands Workforce Comparison
Designer Brands is one of the top stocks in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is currently estimated at about 30,692. Designer Brands totals roughly 14,000 in number of employees claiming about 46% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Designer Brands Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Designer Brands insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Designer Brands' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Designer Brands insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 21,541 | 22,000 |
| 2024-06-01 | 6.3333 | 38 | 6 | 367,026 | 221,992 |
| 2024-03-01 | 0.7727 | 17 | 22 | 1,430,079 | 796,940 |
| 2023-12-01 | 5.6 | 28 | 5 | 30,014 | 102,075 |
| 2023-09-01 | 0.9 | 27 | 30 | 686,802 | 1,362,180 |
| 2023-06-01 | 8.3333 | 25 | 3 | 310,646 | 180,626 |
| 2023-03-01 | 1.1923 | 31 | 26 | 3,391,168 | 2,661,009 |
| 2022-09-01 | 0.8846 | 23 | 26 | 490,364 | 777,009 |
| 2022-06-01 | 24.0 | 24 | 1 | 501,548 | 10,500 |
| 2022-03-01 | 1.05 | 21 | 20 | 1,458,709 | 739,303 |
| 2021-12-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 64,483 | 64,197 |
| 2021-09-01 | 0.7368 | 14 | 19 | 2,472,896 | 1,017,867 |
| 2021-06-01 | 3.25 | 13 | 4 | 87,455 | 9,098 |
| 2021-03-01 | 0.8077 | 21 | 26 | 2,241,945 | 796,693 |
| 2020-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4,330 | 27,424 |
| 2020-09-01 | 4.25 | 17 | 4 | 2,011,208 | 23,711 |
| 2020-06-01 | 7.3333 | 22 | 3 | 64,397 | 25,906 |
| 2020-03-01 | 1.2857 | 45 | 35 | 2,709,714 | 344,065 |
| 2019-12-01 | 3.3333 | 20 | 6 | 29,618 | 83,467 |
| 2019-09-01 | 3.25 | 26 | 8 | 94,703 | 164,385 |
| 2019-06-01 | 9.6667 | 29 | 3 | 154,315 | 147,924 |
| 2019-03-01 | 1.1667 | 42 | 36 | 842,234 | 242,214 |
| 2018-12-01 | 1.2857 | 18 | 14 | 58,815 | 87,911 |
| 2018-09-01 | 4.3333 | 13 | 3 | 21,679 | 21,912 |
| 2018-06-01 | 4.2857 | 30 | 7 | 55,256 | 3,531 |
| 2018-03-01 | 1.1111 | 30 | 27 | 759,735 | 296,781 |
| 2017-12-01 | 2.375 | 19 | 8 | 23,875 | 21,677 |
| 2017-09-01 | 1.2941 | 22 | 17 | 3,584,572 | 3,703,090 |
| 2017-06-01 | 3.3 | 33 | 10 | 147,249 | 12,879 |
| 2017-03-01 | 1.4091 | 31 | 22 | 1,128,993 | 69,008 |
| 2016-12-01 | 2.375 | 19 | 8 | 125,785 | 232,588 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2.8333 | 17 | 6 | 143,161 | 182,534 |
| 2016-06-01 | 5.8 | 29 | 5 | 58,253 | 29,434 |
| 2016-03-01 | 1.4 | 28 | 20 | 478,894 | 63,294 |
| 2015-12-01 | 5.2 | 26 | 5 | 1,516,318 | 577,695 |
| 2015-09-01 | 4.0 | 24 | 6 | 1,190,306 | 1,031,896 |
| 2015-06-01 | 9.3333 | 28 | 3 | 28,622 | 27,000 |
| 2015-03-01 | 1.1132 | 59 | 53 | 840,851 | 695,146 |
| 2014-12-01 | 22.0 | 22 | 1 | 82,061 | 300.00 |
| 2014-09-01 | 19.0 | 19 | 1 | 5,030 | 7,500 |
| 2014-06-01 | 13.75 | 55 | 4 | 87,603 | 9,720 |
| 2014-03-01 | 1.1923 | 31 | 26 | 477,603 | 125,472 |
| 2013-12-01 | 1.0 | 37 | 37 | 496,269 | 994,477 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.7971 | 55 | 69 | 640,111 | 1,302,196 |
| 2013-06-01 | 1.3214 | 37 | 28 | 83,576 | 138,031 |
| 2013-03-01 | 2.5 | 10 | 4 | 177,381 | 10,678 |
| 2012-12-01 | 1.3265 | 65 | 49 | 988,172 | 1,942,972 |
| 2012-09-01 | 2.0625 | 33 | 16 | 40,101 | 58,571 |
| 2012-06-01 | 0.9759 | 81 | 83 | 1,184,797 | 2,185,608 |
| 2012-03-01 | 1.1053 | 63 | 57 | 2,264,998 | 2,859,151 |
| 2011-12-01 | 1.5 | 27 | 18 | 57,286 | 98,077 |
| 2011-09-01 | 0.381 | 8 | 21 | 37,771 | 11,437,238 |
| 2011-06-01 | 1.7857 | 100 | 56 | 23,355,260 | 193,171 |
| 2011-03-01 | 1.6471 | 28 | 17 | 294,132 | 165,206 |
| 2010-12-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 432.00 | 300.00 |
| 2010-09-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 6,040 | 5,500 |
| 2010-06-01 | 1.3333 | 16 | 12 | 73,858 | 73,330 |
| 2010-03-01 | 3.0 | 15 | 5 | 344,409 | 962,773 |
| 2009-09-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 5,089 | 10,278 |
| 2009-06-01 | 4.1429 | 29 | 7 | 860,841 | 75,159 |
| 2008-12-01 | 9.0 | 9 | 1 | 1,305,558 | 2,500 |
| 2008-09-01 | 0.1818 | 2 | 11 | 2,522 | 12,819 |
| 2008-03-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 11,104 | 13,333 |
| 2007-12-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1,028 | 1,000.00 |
| 2007-06-01 | 22.0 | 22 | 1 | 288,089 | 560.00 |
| 2007-03-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 10,543 | 13,288 |
Designer Brands Notable Stakeholders
A Designer Brands stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Designer Brands often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Designer Brands' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Designer Brands' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Roger Rawlins | Chief Executive Officer, Director, Interim President - DSW | Profile | |
| Douglas Howe | CEO Director | Profile | |
| Simon Nankervis | Executive Vice President and President, CEO and Chief Commercial Officer of Camuto LLC d/b/a/ Camuto Group | Profile | |
| Jay Schottenstein | Executive Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Deborah Ferree | Vice Chairman of the Board, President of the Camuto Group | Profile | |
| Drew Domecq | Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer | Profile | |
| Jared Poff | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| William Jordan | Executive Vice President Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Secretary | Profile | |
| Laura Denk | Executive President | Profile | |
| Joseph Schottenstein | Director | Profile | |
| Allan Tanenbaum | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Elaine Eisenman | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Carolee Lee | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Joanne Zaiac | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Joanna Lau | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Ekta SinghBushell | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Harvey Sonnenberg | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Peter Cobb | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Lisa Yerrace | Deputy VP | Profile | |
| Michelle Krall | General VP | Profile | |
| Mary Turner | Executive Vice President and Presidentident of Designer Brands Canada Inc | Profile | |
| Andrea ODonnell | Executive Brands | Profile | |
| Margaret Standing | Director Communications | Profile | |
| Deborah Ferre | Vice Chairman | Profile | |
| Mark Haley | Senior Controller | Profile | |
| Mark CPA | Senior Controller | Profile | |
| James Weinberg | Ex Officer | Profile | |
| Laura Davis | Executive Warehouse | Profile |
About Designer Brands Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Designer Brands often depends on how effective the management is. Designer Brands management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Designer management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Designer management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.02 | 0.11 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.05 | 0.21 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.01 | 0.11 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.08 | 0.15 |
Designer Brands Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Designer Brands use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Designer Brands within its industry.Designer Brands Manpower Efficiency
Return on Designer Brands Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 219.6K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 109.8M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 2.1K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 1M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 11.1K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 5.5M |
Complementary Tools for Designer Stock analysis
When running Designer Brands' price analysis, check to measure Designer Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Designer Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Designer Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Designer Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Designer Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Designer Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
| Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
| Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
| Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
| Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
| Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
| Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios |