Gibson Energy Company Executives
GEI Stock | CAD 25.08 0.18 0.72% |
Gibson Energy employs about 29 people. The company is managed by 29 executives with a total tenure of roughly 133 years, averaging almost 4.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Gibson Energy's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
Steven Spaulding CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
James Estey Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Gibson |
Gibson Energy Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0502 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0502 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.2239 %, meaning that it generated $0.2239 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Gibson Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Gibson Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Gibson Energy's Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 30th of January 2025, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.04, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.05. At this time, Gibson Energy's Return On Assets are very stable compared to the past year.As of the 30th of January 2025, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to grow to about 269.6 M, while Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop about 143.6 M.
Gibson Energy Workforce Comparison
Gibson Energy is currently under evaluation in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Energy industry is currently estimated at about 898. Gibson Energy adds roughly 0.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Energy industry.
Gibson Energy Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.02 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.03 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.03.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.0276 | 0.0395 |
|
|
Gibson Energy Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Gibson Energy Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Gibson Energy price series and its benchmark/peer.
Gibson Energy Notable Stakeholders
A Gibson Energy stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Gibson Energy often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Gibson Energy's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Gibson Energy's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Steven Spaulding | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
James Estey | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Sean Brown | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Michael Lindsay | Senior Vice President - Operations and Engineering | Profile | |
Curtis Philippon | Chief President | Profile | |
Sean Wilson | Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
Sean CFA | Senior CFO | Profile | |
Omar Saif | Senior COO | Profile | |
Susan Jones | Independent Director | Profile | |
James Cleary | Independent Director | Profile | |
Marshall McRae | Independent Director | Profile | |
Mary Peters | Independent Director | Profile | |
Douglas Bloom | Independent Director | Profile | |
Riley Hicks | VP Development | Profile | |
Mark ChycCies | Planning Strategy | Profile | |
Kelly Holtby | Senior Development | Profile | |
John Festival | Independent Director | Profile | |
Beth Pollock | VP Treasurer | Profile | |
Orin Atkins | Vice President - U.S. Business Development | Profile | |
Peggy Montana | Independent Director | Profile | |
Kevin Gertken | General EHS | Profile | |
George Dannecker | Senior Vice President Chief Commercial Officer | Profile | |
MBA CA | Marketing Development | Profile | |
Kyle DeGruchy | Senior Vice President - Supply and Marketing | Profile | |
Ellen Stotland | Vice Management | Profile | |
Krista Weir | Vice Resources | Profile | |
Tammi Price | Vice Affairs | Profile | |
Judy Cotte | Independent Director | Profile | |
Jessica Ferguson | VP Counsel | Profile |
About Gibson Energy Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Gibson Energy often depends on how effective the management is. Gibson Energy management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Gibson management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Gibson management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.09 | 0.05 | |
Return On Assets | 0.04 | 0.04 | |
Return On Equity | 0.21 | 0.22 |
Gibson Energy Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Gibson Energy use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Gibson Energy within its industry.Gibson Energy Manpower Efficiency
Return on Gibson Energy Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 379.8M | |
Revenue Per Executive | 379.8M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 7.4M | |
Net Income Per Executive | 7.4M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 3.8M | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 3.8M |
Other Information on Investing in Gibson Stock
Gibson Energy financial ratios help investors to determine whether Gibson Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Gibson with respect to the benefits of owning Gibson Energy security.