CGI Company Insiders

GIB Stock  USD 92.30  0.68  0.73%   
CGI employs about 94 K people. The company is managed by 46 executives with a total tenure of roughly 266 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 2043.48 employees per reported executive. Analysis of CGI's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
George Schindler  CEO
President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Michael Roach  CEO
CEO and President and Director
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in CGI Inc. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product.

CGI's Workforce Through the Years

Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with CGI's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that CGI will maintain a workforce of about 94000 employees by February 2026.
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid

CGI Management Team Effectiveness

The company has Return on Asset of 0.0902 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0902 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1683 %, implying that it generated $0.1683 on every 100 dollars invested. CGI's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well CGI manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of January 1, 2026, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.13. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.14. At present, CGI's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 15.2 B, whereas Intangible Assets are forecasted to decline to about 713.1 M.
The current year's Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to grow to about 297.2 M. The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 1.7 B

CGI Workforce Comparison

CGI Inc is rated # 2 in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is currently estimated at about 498,972. CGI retains roughly 94,000 in number of employees claiming about 19% of equities under Information Technology industry.

CGI Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.1 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.17 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.17 of operating income.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.140.18
Significantly Down
Very volatile
Net Profit Margin0.05450.1
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Operating Profit Margin0.10.18
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Pretax Profit Margin0.07950.14
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Return On Assets0.05260.0913
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Return On Equity0.0960.16
Way Down
Slightly volatile

CGI Inc Benchmark Summation

Operator
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. CGI Inc Price Series Summation is a cross summation of CGI price series and its benchmark/peer.

CGI Notable Stakeholders

A CGI stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as CGI often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. CGI's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting CGI's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
George SchindlerPresident, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorProfile
Michael RoachCEO and President and DirectorProfile
Serge GodinExecutive Chairman of the Board, Co-FounderProfile
Andre ImbeauFounder, Vice Chairman and Advisor to the FounderProfile
Mark BoyajianExecutive Vice-President and Global Chief Business Engineering OfficerProfile
David HendersonPresident - United States Operations, Commercial and State GovernmentProfile
George MattackalPresident - Asia Pacific Operations, Global Delivery Centers of ExcellenceProfile
JeanMichel BaticlePresident France, Luxembourg and Morocco OperationsProfile
Francois BoulangerChief Financial Officer, Executive Vice PresidentProfile
Benoit DubeExecutive Vice President, Legal and Economic Affairs and Company SecretaryProfile
Steve PerronSenior Vice-President Finance and TreasuryProfile
Julie GodinVice-Chair of the Board, Chief Planning and Administration Officer, Executive Vice PresidentProfile
Torsten StrassPresident - Central and Eastern Europe OperationsProfile
Timothy HurlebausPresident - United States Operations, Commercial and State GovernmentProfile
Guy VigeantSenior Vice President - Mergers and AcquisitionsProfile
Alison ReedIndependent DirectorProfile
Paule DoreIndependent DirectorProfile
Timothy HearnLead Independent DirectorProfile
Sophie BrochuIndependent DirectorProfile
Joakim WesthIndependent DirectorProfile
Gilles LabbeIndependent DirectorProfile
Richard EvansIndependent DirectorProfile
Frank WitterIndependent DirectorProfile
Kathy WallerIndependent DirectorProfile
George CopeIndependent DirectorProfile
Alain BouchardSr. VP of Québec City Bus. Unit, Independent Director and Member of HR CommitteeProfile
Michael PedersenIndependent DirectorProfile
Lucille BonenfantChief VPProfile
Stephen PolozIndependent DirectorProfile
Laurent GerinPresident Western and Southern Europe OperationsProfile
John KarnbladPresident Scandinavia OperationsProfile
Mary PowellIndependent DirectorProfile
Tara McGeehanPresident - United Kingdom and Australia OperationsProfile
Stephanie MangoPresidentProfile
Jamie HollandSenior MarketsProfile
Susan BaldingSenior CommunicationProfile
Benoit DubExecutive SecretaryProfile
Stanley SimsSenior OfficerProfile
Renaud CaronSenior DevelopmentProfile
Par ForsPresident - Scandinavia OperationsProfile
Bernard LabelleChief Human Resources Officer, Executive Vice PresidentProfile
Leslie McKaySenior OfficerProfile
Michael KeatingSenior AcquisitionsProfile
LeenaMari LahteenmaaPresident - Finland, Poland, and Baltics OperationsProfile
Steven StaraceSenior OperationsProfile
Rjean BernardSenior UnitProfile

About CGI Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as CGI Inc often depends on how effective the management is. CGI management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of CGI management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the CGI management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Return On Tangible Assets 0.23  0.13 
Return On Capital Employed 0.21  0.14 
Return On Assets 0.09  0.05 
Return On Equity 0.16  0.10 
Please note, the presentation of CGI's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, CGI's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of CGI's management manipulating its earnings.

CGI Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as CGI use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare CGI within its industry.

CGI Manpower Efficiency

Return on CGI Manpower

Revenue Per Employee169.3K
Revenue Per Executive345.9M
Net Income Per Employee17.6K
Net Income Per Executive36M

Complementary Tools for CGI Stock analysis

When running CGI's price analysis, check to measure CGI's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy CGI is operating at the current time. Most of CGI's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of CGI's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move CGI's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of CGI to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated