Ingersoll Rand Company Insiders
IR Stock | USD 105.35 1.35 1.30% |
Ingersoll Rand's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Ingersoll Rand stock suggests that virtually all insiders are panicking at this time. Ingersoll Rand employs about 18 K people. The company is managed by 33 executives with a total tenure of roughly 118 years, averaging almost 3.0 years of service per executive, having 545.45 employees per reported executive.
Ingersoll Rand's Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-11-05 | Michael J Scheske | Disposed 2531 @ 97.44 | View | ||
2024-08-27 | Kathleen M Keene | Disposed 4629 @ 89.99 | View | ||
2024-08-21 | Elizabeth Meloy Hepding | Disposed 7500 @ 91.42 | View | ||
2024-08-15 | Vicente Reynal | Disposed 50000 @ 92.51 | View | ||
2024-08-08 | Andrew R Schiesl | Disposed 15381 @ 89.74 | View | ||
2024-06-04 | Vicente Reynal | Disposed 198486 @ 88.11 | View | ||
2024-05-17 | Andrew R Schiesl | Disposed 22369 @ 92.17 | View | ||
2024-04-09 | Sheldon Whitehouse | Disposed @ 93.5 | |||
2024-03-11 | Andrew R Schiesl | Disposed 35000 @ 89.46 | View | ||
2024-02-28 | Vicente Reynal | Disposed 240000 @ 90.16 | View | ||
2024-02-22 | Andrew R Schiesl | Disposed 10421 @ 89.95 | View | ||
2024-02-21 | Michael J Scheske | Disposed 7590 @ 88 | View | ||
2023-12-05 | Andrew R Schiesl | Disposed 13000 @ 71.89 | View |
Monitoring Ingersoll Rand's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Ingersoll |
Ingersoll Rand's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Ingersoll Rand's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Ingersoll will maintain a workforce of slightly above 18000 employees by December 2024.Ingersoll Rand's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Ingersoll Rand, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Ingersoll Rand by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2024-07-08 | Representative Ro Khanna | Acquired $50K to $100K | Verify | ||
2024-05-19 | Senator Sheldon Whitehouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2023-10-17 | Senator Sheldon Whitehouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2023-10-16 | Senator Sheldon Whitehouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-03-13 | Senator Jacklyn Rosen | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2019-06-14 | Senator Mitch McConnell | Acquired $250K to $500K | Verify | ||
2019-06-13 | Senator Mitch McConnell | Acquired $250K to $500K | Verify |
Ingersoll Rand Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0534 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0534. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.0848 %, which means that it produced $0.0848 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. Ingersoll Rand's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Ingersoll Rand manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Ingersoll Rand's Return On Tangible Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/26/2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.05, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.07. At this time, Ingersoll Rand's Other Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/26/2024, Other Current Assets is likely to grow to about 273.1 M, while Intangible Assets are likely to drop slightly above 3.2 B.As of 11/26/2024, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to grow to about 2.1 B, while Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop slightly above 272.9 M.
Ingersoll Rand Workforce Comparison
Ingersoll Rand is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is currently estimated at about 371,300. Ingersoll Rand holds roughly 18,000 in number of employees claiming about 5% of equities under Industrials industry.
Ingersoll Rand Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 0.12 %, which suggests that even a small decline in it sales will erase profits and may result in a net loss, or a negative profit margin. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.21 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.21.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.3 | 0.4192 |
|
|
Ingersoll Rand Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Ingersoll Rand insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Ingersoll Rand's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Ingersoll Rand insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-12-01 | 0.6667 | 4 | 6 | 28,128 | 54,893 |
2024-09-01 | 0.9375 | 15 | 16 | 128,092 | 177,336 |
2024-06-01 | 0.2667 | 4 | 15 | 494,998 | 974,935 |
2024-03-01 | 1.0 | 75 | 75 | 1,062,099 | 836,298 |
2023-12-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 6,375 | 22,532 |
2023-09-01 | 0.4118 | 7 | 17 | 185,887 | 376,844 |
2023-06-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 59,699 | 146,444 |
2023-03-01 | 0.8764 | 78 | 89 | 877,275 | 499,144 |
2022-12-01 | 0.3333 | 2 | 6 | 1,746 | 48,149 |
2022-09-01 | 0.4444 | 4 | 9 | 6,005 | 30,144 |
2022-06-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 2,365 | 5,153 |
2022-03-01 | 0.8283 | 82 | 99 | 602,022 | 354,074 |
2021-12-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 11,974 | 28,303 |
2021-09-01 | 0.9 | 9 | 10 | 176,924 | 264,114 |
2021-06-01 | 0.3125 | 5 | 16 | 44,709 | 30,017,190 |
2021-03-01 | 0.9024 | 74 | 82 | 507,498 | 287,537 |
2020-12-01 | 0.4444 | 8 | 18 | 369,200 | 658,829 |
2020-09-01 | 0.4118 | 7 | 17 | 196,594 | 395,034 |
2020-06-01 | 0.2105 | 4 | 19 | 84,682 | 52,145,877 |
2020-03-01 | 1.7797 | 105 | 59 | 1,578,059 | 501,424 |
2019-12-01 | 0.7 | 7 | 10 | 537,338 | 830,756 |
2019-09-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 152,890 | 304,623 |
2019-06-01 | 0.5455 | 12 | 22 | 23,286 | 61,730 |
2019-03-01 | 1.4595 | 54 | 37 | 1,689,489 | 763,029 |
2018-12-01 | 0.0909 | 1 | 11 | 50,274 | 40,187,256 |
2018-09-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 44,008 | 90,745,605 |
2018-06-01 | 0.75 | 9 | 12 | 19,328 | 60,890,023 |
2018-03-01 | 1.76 | 44 | 25 | 1,485,883 | 566,464 |
2017-12-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 11,138 | 50,502,687 |
2017-06-01 | 0.2188 | 7 | 32 | 95,541 | 2,302,530 |
2017-03-01 | 0.7857 | 22 | 28 | 757,215 | 611,637 |
2016-12-01 | 0.4615 | 6 | 13 | 352,706 | 77,568 |
2016-06-01 | 0.6667 | 6 | 9 | 12,900 | 24,458 |
2016-03-01 | 1.05 | 21 | 20 | 989,108 | 364,457 |
2015-12-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 35,243 | 18,229 |
2015-06-01 | 2.0 | 6 | 3 | 12,450 | 14,038 |
2015-03-01 | 0.7188 | 23 | 32 | 935,993 | 488,810 |
2014-12-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 59,428 | 75,990 |
2014-09-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 21,380 | 46,260 |
2014-06-01 | 0.2222 | 2 | 9 | 92,300 | 270,132 |
2014-03-01 | 0.9268 | 38 | 41 | 663,386 | 431,669 |
2013-12-01 | 0.7368 | 28 | 38 | 1,348,593 | 2,659,345 |
2013-09-01 | 1.0513 | 41 | 39 | 1,399,960 | 2,659,364 |
2013-06-01 | 2.3846 | 31 | 13 | 68,599 | 226,176 |
2013-03-01 | 0.7647 | 39 | 51 | 629,836 | 396,991 |
2012-12-01 | 8.0 | 16 | 2 | 26,177 | 50,592 |
2012-09-01 | 9.0 | 36 | 4 | 32,789 | 55,280 |
2012-06-01 | 6.6 | 33 | 5 | 16,452 | 50,731 |
2012-03-01 | 2.3333 | 42 | 18 | 269,875 | 28,779 |
2011-09-01 | 2.1111 | 19 | 9 | 3,681 | 25,137 |
2011-06-01 | 0.7143 | 10 | 14 | 45,941 | 74,896 |
2011-03-01 | 1.1875 | 19 | 16 | 364,370 | 63,288 |
2010-12-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 20,328 | 8,098 |
2010-09-01 | 0.1111 | 2 | 18 | 7,201 | 118,695 |
2010-06-01 | 1.25 | 5 | 4 | 67,270 | 123,188 |
2010-03-01 | 1.3684 | 26 | 19 | 1,280,796 | 170,836 |
2009-12-01 | 0.3889 | 7 | 18 | 211,554 | 621,503 |
2009-09-01 | 0.8824 | 15 | 17 | 80,117 | 238,440 |
2009-03-01 | 6.8 | 34 | 5 | 1,612,312 | 41,829 |
2008-09-01 | 2.0 | 16 | 8 | 11,394 | 191,624 |
2008-06-01 | 1.6154 | 21 | 13 | 130,986 | 72,641 |
2008-03-01 | 14.0 | 28 | 2 | 779,964 | 21,780 |
2007-06-01 | 3.75 | 15 | 4 | 63,708 | 175,084 |
2007-03-01 | 5.5 | 22 | 4 | 407,718 | 18,000 |
2006-12-01 | 7.0 | 14 | 2 | 11,372 | 9,000 |
2006-03-01 | 7.0 | 21 | 3 | 433,394 | 13,500 |
2005-12-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 31,757 | 16,000 |
2005-03-01 | 2.2857 | 16 | 7 | 382,009 | 91,666 |
2004-12-01 | 1.6667 | 15 | 9 | 36,318 | 65,000 |
2004-09-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 21,608 | 4,500 |
2004-06-01 | 3.25 | 13 | 4 | 21,082 | 32,500 |
2004-03-01 | 5.0 | 15 | 3 | 284,009 | 37,000 |
2003-12-01 | 5.5 | 11 | 2 | 17,790 | 26,000 |
2003-09-01 | 2.0 | 14 | 7 | 37,430 | 75,126 |
Ingersoll Rand Notable Stakeholders
An Ingersoll Rand stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Ingersoll Rand often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Ingersoll Rand's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Ingersoll Rand's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Vicente Reynal | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Vikram Kini | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Michael Weatherred | Senior Vice President - IR Execution Excellence (IRX), Strategy & Business Development | Profile | |
Andrew Schiesl | Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer, General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
Tony White | Independent Director | Profile | |
Kirk Arnold | Independent Director | Profile | |
Gary Forsee | Independent Director | Profile | |
Andrew Esq | General VP | Profile | |
Matthew Fort | Global Relations | Profile | |
Matthew Emmerich | Senior Officer | Profile | |
Peter Stavros | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Kathryn Freytag | VP Officer | Profile | |
Kate Keene | Senior Vice President of Human Resources, Talent, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion | Profile | |
Michael Scheske | VP Officer | Profile | |
Enrique Viseras | Vice President General Manager, Industrials Segment EMEA | Profile | |
Joshua Weisenbeck | Independent Director | Profile | |
James Mundy | Ex Officer | Profile | |
Elizabeth Centoni | Independent Director | Profile | |
Elizabeth Hepding | Senior Vice President - Business Development | Profile | |
Kristen ActisGrande | Vice President of Investor Relations and Financial Planning and Analysis | Profile | |
Craig Mundy | Senior Vice President of Human Resources | Profile | |
Mark Wagner | Vice President General Manager of the Specialty Vehicle Technologies Business Unit | Profile | |
Marc Jones | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Donnelly | Independent Director | Profile | |
Santiago Duval | Senior Technologies | Profile | |
Arnold Li | AsiaPacific, Services | Profile | |
Gary Gillespie | Vice President General Manager for Industrial Americas of Gardner Denver | Profile | |
Chris Miorin | Vice President of Investor Relations | Profile | |
Sia Abbaszadeh | Senior Vice President of strategy and Technology | Profile | |
John Humphrey | Independent Director | Profile | |
Nicholas KendallJones | Vice President General Manager of the Precision and Science Technologies Business Unit | Profile | |
Kathleen Keene | Diversity, Resources | Profile | |
Scott Watson | Senior Platform | Profile |
About Ingersoll Rand Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Ingersoll Rand often depends on how effective the management is. Ingersoll Rand management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Ingersoll management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Ingersoll management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.15 | 0.15 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.08 | 0.07 | |
Return On Assets | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
Return On Equity | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Ingersoll Rand Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Ingersoll Rand use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Ingersoll Rand within its industry.Ingersoll Rand Manpower Efficiency
Return on Ingersoll Rand Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 382K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 208.4M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 43.3K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 23.6M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 123.5K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 67.4M |
Additional Tools for Ingersoll Stock Analysis
When running Ingersoll Rand's price analysis, check to measure Ingersoll Rand's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Ingersoll Rand is operating at the current time. Most of Ingersoll Rand's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Ingersoll Rand's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Ingersoll Rand's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Ingersoll Rand to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.