Jones Lang Company Leadership
JLL Stock | USD 283.67 20.40 7.75% |
Jones Lang employs about 111 K people. The company is managed by 39 executives with a total tenure of roughly 213 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 2846.15 employees per reported executive. Inspection of Jones Lang's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Richard Bloxam CEO Global Chief Executive Officer Capital Markets |
Guy Grainger CEO Chief Executive Officer - Europe, Middle East and Africa Business Segment |
Jones |
Jones Lang's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Jones Lang's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Jones will maintain a workforce of about 111000 employees by December 2024.Jones Lang Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0305 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0305 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0738 %, implying that it generated $0.0738 on every 100 dollars invested. Jones Lang's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Jones Lang manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Capital Employed is expected to rise to 0.13 this year, although the value of Return On Tangible Assets will most likely fall to 0.02. At this time, Jones Lang's Other Current Assets are quite stable compared to the past year. Other Assets is expected to rise to about 1.3 B this year, although the value of Deferred Long Term Asset Charges will most likely fall to about 195.6 M.Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to rise to about 790.3 M this year, although the value of Common Stock Shares Outstanding will most likely fall to about 41.4 M.
Jones Lang Workforce Comparison
Jones Lang LaSalle is rated second overall in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Real Estate industry is currently estimated at about 368,698. Jones Lang totals roughly 111,000 in number of employees claiming about 30% of equities listed under Real Estate industry.
Jones Lang Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.02 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.04 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.04 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Profit Margin | 0.0103 | 0.0109 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.031 | 0.0326 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.0115 | 0.0121 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.0133 | 0.014 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.034 | 0.0358 |
|
|
Jones Lang Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Jones Lang insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Jones Lang's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Jones Lang insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-12-01 | 3.0 | 6 | 2 | 600.00 | 85.00 |
2024-06-01 | 3.7778 | 34 | 9 | 98,950 | 2,682 |
2024-03-01 | 0.7931 | 23 | 29 | 111,115 | 87,460 |
2023-12-01 | 1.5 | 6 | 4 | 963.00 | 563.00 |
2023-09-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 4,021 | 4,775 |
2023-06-01 | 4.25 | 34 | 8 | 84,135 | 5,182 |
2023-03-01 | 1.1429 | 16 | 14 | 152,280 | 74,661 |
2022-12-01 | 1.0 | 21 | 21 | 17,152 | 22,006 |
2022-09-01 | 4.0 | 8 | 2 | 3,737 | 483.00 |
2022-06-01 | 2.2857 | 32 | 14 | 59,877 | 13,037 |
2022-03-01 | 1.1905 | 25 | 21 | 101,467 | 52,412 |
2021-12-01 | 1.3333 | 20 | 15 | 71,496 | 25,652 |
2021-06-01 | 4.0 | 32 | 8 | 62,880 | 4,250 |
2021-03-01 | 0.52 | 26 | 50 | 88,213 | 135,794 |
2020-12-01 | 1.0769 | 14 | 13 | 17,375 | 21,785 |
2020-09-01 | 0.8 | 4 | 5 | 4,267 | 1,748 |
2020-06-01 | 2.2 | 22 | 10 | 22,215 | 8,086 |
2020-03-01 | 0.5577 | 29 | 52 | 56,724 | 71,198 |
2019-12-01 | 1.0769 | 14 | 13 | 38,979 | 13,178 |
2019-09-01 | 0.9 | 9 | 10 | 4,267 | 2,622 |
2019-06-01 | 1.6471 | 28 | 17 | 34,738 | 28,521 |
2019-03-01 | 0.6585 | 27 | 41 | 68,301 | 61,580 |
2018-12-01 | 1.875 | 15 | 8 | 6,397 | 4,920 |
2018-09-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 1,019 | 867.00 |
2018-06-01 | 2.0909 | 46 | 22 | 160,070 | 24,756 |
2018-03-01 | 0.7368 | 42 | 57 | 115,929 | 87,094 |
2017-12-01 | 0.9412 | 16 | 17 | 6,671 | 19,749 |
2017-09-01 | 0.5357 | 15 | 28 | 8,433 | 13,900 |
2017-06-01 | 1.9091 | 21 | 11 | 15,894 | 6,998 |
2017-03-01 | 0.8108 | 30 | 37 | 144,735 | 117,872 |
2016-12-01 | 1.1429 | 16 | 14 | 3,356 | 3,126 |
2016-09-01 | 0.6316 | 24 | 38 | 35,710 | 38,273 |
2016-06-01 | 1.5333 | 23 | 15 | 21,286 | 9,296 |
2016-03-01 | 1.087 | 25 | 23 | 133,702 | 49,051 |
2015-12-01 | 0.7647 | 13 | 17 | 3,867 | 30,657 |
2015-09-01 | 0.5897 | 23 | 39 | 31,730 | 46,533 |
2015-06-01 | 1.2 | 30 | 25 | 21,920 | 25,552 |
2015-03-01 | 1.2963 | 35 | 27 | 81,158 | 69,972 |
2014-12-01 | 0.6667 | 12 | 18 | 4,793 | 19,647 |
2014-09-01 | 0.4286 | 18 | 42 | 29,118 | 54,500 |
2014-06-01 | 1.2105 | 23 | 19 | 20,216 | 26,401 |
2014-03-01 | 1.0769 | 28 | 26 | 70,714 | 88,830 |
2013-12-01 | 0.8667 | 13 | 15 | 9,039 | 24,642 |
2013-09-01 | 0.6304 | 29 | 46 | 63,764 | 70,440 |
2013-06-01 | 1.625 | 13 | 8 | 14,725 | 17,224 |
2013-03-01 | 1.6923 | 22 | 13 | 68,426 | 37,893 |
2012-12-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 458.00 | 39,500 |
2012-09-01 | 0.6596 | 31 | 47 | 58,490 | 64,756 |
2012-06-01 | 1.5833 | 19 | 12 | 19,026 | 8,645 |
2012-03-01 | 1.6667 | 30 | 18 | 103,833 | 90,821 |
2011-09-01 | 0.6981 | 37 | 53 | 61,871 | 71,124 |
2011-06-01 | 2.5714 | 18 | 7 | 11,967 | 7,679 |
2011-03-01 | 1.75 | 35 | 20 | 198,590 | 195,479 |
2010-12-01 | 1.2 | 6 | 5 | 1,028 | 10,206 |
2010-09-01 | 0.58 | 29 | 50 | 68,584 | 76,263 |
2010-06-01 | 2.6667 | 16 | 6 | 11,617 | 15,406 |
2010-03-01 | 1.1143 | 39 | 35 | 114,194 | 82,223 |
2009-12-01 | 10.0 | 10 | 1 | 4,233 | 3,000 |
2009-09-01 | 0.6269 | 42 | 67 | 122,194 | 165,509 |
2009-06-01 | 2.7143 | 19 | 7 | 54,619 | 105,421 |
2009-03-01 | 3.6667 | 22 | 6 | 148,672 | 7,875 |
2008-09-01 | 1.375 | 11 | 8 | 195,266 | 31,024 |
2008-06-01 | 1.0851 | 51 | 47 | 82,664 | 89,126 |
2008-03-01 | 4.25 | 34 | 8 | 197,157 | 37,007 |
2007-12-01 | 2.0 | 18 | 9 | 13,974 | 41,614 |
2007-09-01 | 0.9231 | 12 | 13 | 11,212 | 85,223 |
2007-06-01 | 0.9615 | 50 | 52 | 81,786 | 124,009 |
2007-03-01 | 6.5 | 39 | 6 | 80,234 | 25,634 |
2006-12-01 | 1.5333 | 23 | 15 | 45,140 | 84,054 |
2006-09-01 | 0.6591 | 29 | 44 | 61,768 | 102,714 |
2006-06-01 | 4.0 | 20 | 5 | 7,268 | 9,000 |
2006-03-01 | 1.1148 | 68 | 61 | 350,001 | 461,181 |
2005-12-01 | 0.9524 | 20 | 21 | 60,287 | 88,500 |
2005-09-01 | 0.75 | 18 | 24 | 43,668 | 77,241 |
2005-03-01 | 2.6 | 26 | 10 | 171,526 | 141,688 |
2004-12-01 | 0.6667 | 8 | 12 | 8,205 | 186,343 |
2004-09-01 | 0.8462 | 11 | 13 | 27,316 | 54,988 |
2004-06-01 | 16.0 | 16 | 1 | 17,125 | 4,000 |
2004-03-01 | 4.6667 | 14 | 3 | 52,622 | 25,000 |
2003-09-01 | 0.3333 | 2 | 6 | 7,000 | 114,000 |
Jones Lang Notable Stakeholders
A Jones Lang stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Jones Lang often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Jones Lang's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Jones Lang's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Richard Bloxam | Global Chief Executive Officer Capital Markets | Profile | |
Andy Poppink | CEO Board | Profile | |
Guy Grainger | Chief Executive Officer - Europe, Middle East and Africa Business Segment | Profile | |
Christian Ulbrich | CEO for Europe, Middle East and Africa Operating Segment | Profile | |
Gregory OBrien | Chief Executive Officer, Americas Business Segment | Profile | |
Jeff Jacobson | CEO of Lasalle Investment Management - Jones Lang Lasalle's Investment Management Bus. | Profile | |
Mark Gabbay | Chief Executive Officer of LaSalle Investment Management, JLL’s investment management business segment | Profile | |
Anthony Couse | Chief Executive Officer of the Asia-Pacific Business | Profile | |
Sheila Penrose | Non-Executive Lead Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Siddharth Mehta | Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Neil Murray | Global Chief Executive Officer of Corporate Solutions business and Chairman of our Global Corporate Solutions Board | Profile | |
Karen Brennan | Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
Stephanie Plaines | Global Chief Financial Officer | Profile | |
Patricia Maxson | Interim Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer | Profile | |
Kylie Kendrick | Chief Operating Officer | Profile | |
Jordan Jeffery | COO Management | Profile | |
Matthew Carter | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Samuel Piazza | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Deborah McAneny | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Ming Lu | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Hugo Bague | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Bridget Macaskill | Independent Non-Executive Director | Profile | |
Martin Nesbitt | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Ann Petach | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Yao Morin | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Mihir Shah | Co-CEO of JLL Technologies | Profile | |
Siddharth Taparia | Global Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
Benjamin Hawke | Chief Accounting Officer, Assistant Global Controller | Profile | |
Alan Tse | Global Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
Laura Adams | CHRO Board | Profile | |
George Thomas | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Yishai Lerner | Co-CEO of JLL Technologies | Profile | |
Jeetendra Patel | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Efrain Rivera | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Louis Bowers | Global Controller and Principal Accounting Officer | Profile | |
Tina Ju | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Mary Bilbrey | Global Chief Human Resource Officer | Profile | |
Judith Tempelman | Global Head of Corporate Development | Profile | |
Joe Silva | Chief Information Security Officer | Profile |
About Jones Lang Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Jones Lang LaSalle often depends on how effective the management is. Jones Lang management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Jones management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Jones management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.07 | 0.13 | |
Return On Assets | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
Return On Equity | 0.04 | 0.03 |
Jones Lang Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Jones Lang use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Jones Lang within its industry.Jones Lang Manpower Efficiency
Return on Jones Lang Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 187K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 532.3M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 2K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 5.8M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 3.7K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 10.5M |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Jones Lang LaSalle. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of economic analysis. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.
Is Real Estate Management & Development space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Jones Lang. If investors know Jones will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Jones Lang listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 1.602 | Earnings Share 9.9 | Revenue Per Share 473.594 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.148 | Return On Assets 0.0305 |
The market value of Jones Lang LaSalle is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Jones that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Jones Lang's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Jones Lang's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Jones Lang's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Jones Lang's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Jones Lang's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Jones Lang is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Jones Lang's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.