Li FT Company Insiders
| LIFT Stock | CAD 4.32 0.08 1.82% |
Li FT employs about 3 people. The company is managed by 8 executives with a total tenure of roughly 7 years, averaging almost 0.0 years of service per executive, having 0.38 employees per reported executive. Recap of Li FT's management performance can provide insight into the venture performance.
LIFT |
Li FT Management Team Effectiveness
Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.03 in 2025. Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to -0.03 in 2025. Total Assets is likely to drop to about 9.8 M in 2025. Non Current Assets Total is likely to drop to about 6.2 M in 2025Li FT's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Li FT manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 19.8 M in 2025
Li FT Workforce Comparison
Li FT Power is currently regarded as number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Internet Content & Information industry is now estimated at about 25.0. Li FT retains roughly 3.0 in number of employees claiming about 12% of equities under Internet Content & Information industry.
Li FT Power Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Li FT Power Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Li FT price series and its benchmark/peer.
Li FT Notable Stakeholders
A Li FT stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Li FT often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Li FT's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Li FT's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Leonard BSc | CEO President | Profile | |
| Alexander Langer | President Director | Profile | |
| Anthony Tse | Executive Board | Profile | |
| Iveta Michelcikova | Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
| Daniel Gordon | Investor Manager | Profile | |
| April Hayward | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| David Smithson | Senior Geology | Profile | |
| BA CA | Chief Officer | Profile |
About Li FT Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Li FT Power often depends on how effective the management is. Li FT management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of LIFT management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the LIFT management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.03) | (0.03) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | (0.03) | (0.03) | |
| Return On Assets | (0.03) | (0.03) | |
| Return On Equity | (0.03) | (0.03) |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Li FT's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Li FT Power. Check Li FT's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Li FT's management manipulating its earnings.
Li FT Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Li FT use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Li FT within its industry.Li FT Manpower Efficiency
Return on Li FT Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 0.0 | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 0.0 | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 1.9M | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 695K | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 469.8K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 176.2K |
Additional Tools for LIFT Stock Analysis
When running Li FT's price analysis, check to measure Li FT's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Li FT is operating at the current time. Most of Li FT's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Li FT's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Li FT's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Li FT to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.