MillerKnoll Company Leadership
| MLKN Stock | USD 18.28 0.19 1.03% |
About 75 percent of all MillerKnoll's insiders are aggressively buying. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading MillerKnoll stock suggests that quite a few insiders are very bullish at this time. MillerKnoll employs about 10.4 K people. The company is managed by 15 executives with a total tenure of roughly 24225 years, averaging almost 1615.0 years of service per executive, having 692.13 employees per reported executive.
Insider Sentiment 75
Mostly Buying
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2023-12-22 | Jeffrey M Stutz | Disposed 9771 @ 28.23 | View | ||
| 2023-07-18 | Michael A Volkema | Acquired 13584 @ 16.95 | View | ||
| 2023-05-05 | Megan Lyon | Acquired 6410 @ 15.6 | View | ||
| 2023-05-03 | Michael A Volkema | Acquired 60200 @ 16.61 | View |
Monitoring MillerKnoll's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
MillerKnoll | Build AI portfolio with MillerKnoll Stock |
MillerKnoll's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with MillerKnoll's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that MillerKnoll will maintain a workforce of about 10380 employees by February 2026.MillerKnoll Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0375 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0375 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (0.0157) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. MillerKnoll's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well MillerKnoll manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 2nd of January 2026, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to -0.02. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.02. At this time, MillerKnoll's Fixed Asset Turnover is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 2nd of January 2026, Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 1.97, while Other Current Assets are likely to drop about 56.4 M.As of the 2nd of January 2026, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 61.5 M. In addition to that, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to drop to about 36 MMillerKnoll maintains a total of 68.51 Million outstanding shares. The majority of MillerKnoll outstanding shares are owned by institutional investors. These third-party entities are usually referred to as non-private investors looking to shop for positions in MillerKnoll to benefit from reduced commissions. Consequently, institutional holders are subject to a different set of regulations than regular investors in MillerKnoll. Please pay attention to any change in the institutional holdings of MillerKnoll as this could imply that something significant has changed or is about to change at the company. Please note that no matter how many assets the company has, if the real value of the firm is less than the current market value, you may not be able to make money on it.
Shares in Circulation | First Issued 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 69.2 M | Current Value 69 M | Avarage Shares Outstanding 75.5 M | Quarterly Volatility 15.5 M |
MillerKnoll Workforce Comparison
MillerKnoll is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is now estimated at about 91,807. MillerKnoll retains roughly 10,382 in number of employees claiming about 11% of equities under Industrials industry.
MillerKnoll Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of (0.01) %, which may suggest that it does not properly executes on its current pricing strategies or is unable to control all of the operational costs. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.05 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.05.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.41 | 0.45 |
|
|
MillerKnoll Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific MillerKnoll insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on MillerKnoll's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, MillerKnoll insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-01 | 0.8 | 96 | 120 | 867,554 | 740,859 |
| 2025-03-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 75,657 | 508.66 |
| 2024-09-01 | 0.9542 | 125 | 131 | 672,225 | 167,924 |
| 2024-03-01 | 2.2 | 11 | 5 | 68,447 | 22,696 |
| 2023-12-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 9,029 | 18,801 |
| 2023-09-01 | 0.9 | 54 | 60 | 1,621,396 | 126,905 |
| 2023-03-01 | 1.8333 | 11 | 6 | 57,623 | 9,675 |
| 2022-09-01 | 0.8767 | 64 | 73 | 612,632 | 116,043 |
| 2022-06-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 2,000 | 2,514 |
| 2022-03-01 | 1.125 | 18 | 16 | 50,745 | 17,123 |
| 2021-12-01 | 0.1 | 1 | 10 | 2,736 | 35,272 |
| 2021-09-01 | 1.32 | 66 | 50 | 403,780 | 123,210 |
| 2021-06-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 300.00 | 450.00 |
| 2020-09-01 | 1.7143 | 48 | 28 | 1,128,757 | 59,346 |
| 2020-03-01 | 0.6129 | 19 | 31 | 150,465 | 205,565 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.8421 | 32 | 38 | 194,136 | 309,653 |
| 2019-06-01 | 0.4 | 2 | 5 | 5,108 | 12,635 |
| 2019-03-01 | 3.25 | 13 | 4 | 34,419 | 19,967 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.863 | 63 | 73 | 587,773 | 559,999 |
| 2018-06-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 19,907 | 38,765 |
| 2018-03-01 | 0.6667 | 28 | 42 | 364,612 | 694,897 |
| 2017-12-01 | 0.2222 | 2 | 9 | 15,027 | 49,011 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.7647 | 78 | 102 | 603,217 | 452,407 |
| 2017-06-01 | 0.3571 | 5 | 14 | 90,326 | 194,255 |
| 2017-03-01 | 1.125 | 9 | 8 | 25,673 | 27,387 |
| 2016-09-01 | 1.1333 | 85 | 75 | 1,008,104 | 288,972 |
| 2016-06-01 | 0.4286 | 3 | 7 | 75,571 | 133,582 |
| 2016-03-01 | 1.2222 | 11 | 9 | 37,261 | 19,286 |
| 2015-12-01 | 0.4 | 8 | 20 | 36,674 | 118,445 |
| 2015-09-01 | 1.0667 | 32 | 30 | 275,050 | 152,404 |
| 2015-06-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 505.00 | 20,331 |
| 2015-03-01 | 1.125 | 9 | 8 | 27,388 | 27,272 |
| 2014-12-01 | 0.3889 | 7 | 18 | 107,294 | 221,480 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.8857 | 31 | 35 | 203,708 | 146,967 |
| 2014-06-01 | 0.3704 | 10 | 27 | 286,843 | 532,517 |
| 2014-03-01 | 0.6522 | 15 | 23 | 23,846 | 24,478 |
| 2013-12-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 17,075 | 90,073 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.7593 | 41 | 54 | 354,056 | 520,432 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.4688 | 15 | 32 | 184,981 | 318,414 |
| 2012-09-01 | 3.0 | 45 | 15 | 468,555 | 23,096 |
| 2012-03-01 | 0.9167 | 11 | 12 | 46,028 | 49,210 |
| 2011-12-01 | 0.4 | 6 | 15 | 110,242 | 202,490 |
| 2011-09-01 | 2.55 | 51 | 20 | 364,848 | 56,974 |
| 2011-06-01 | 0.3571 | 5 | 14 | 47,402 | 103,561 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.6571 | 23 | 35 | 94,437 | 553,033 |
| 2010-12-01 | 0.125 | 2 | 16 | 12,306 | 304,734 |
| 2010-09-01 | 1.1 | 11 | 10 | 77,709 | 29,671 |
| 2010-06-01 | 0.4286 | 3 | 7 | 12,192 | 43,970 |
| 2010-03-01 | 0.8 | 4 | 5 | 24,923 | 12,000 |
| 2009-12-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 6,000 | 8,925 |
| 2009-09-01 | 1.1667 | 7 | 6 | 38,912 | 105,179 |
| 2009-03-01 | 1.6 | 8 | 5 | 99,763 | 14,015 |
| 2008-09-01 | 1.6667 | 10 | 6 | 55,273 | 4,285 |
| 2008-03-01 | 1.4 | 7 | 5 | 36,323 | 13,430 |
| 2007-12-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 54,513 | 55,143 |
| 2007-09-01 | 15.0 | 15 | 1 | 82,161 | 2,676 |
| 2007-06-01 | 0.2857 | 2 | 7 | 30,000 | 80,279 |
| 2007-03-01 | 0.7619 | 16 | 21 | 88,739 | 112,542 |
| 2006-12-01 | 0.4167 | 5 | 12 | 24,421 | 33,067 |
| 2006-09-01 | 1.4286 | 30 | 21 | 206,023 | 207,222 |
| 2006-06-01 | 0.1429 | 1 | 7 | 1,949 | 23,281 |
| 2006-03-01 | 1.4545 | 16 | 11 | 56,896 | 34,834 |
| 2005-12-01 | 0.6071 | 17 | 28 | 115,654 | 127,922 |
| 2005-09-01 | 0.6364 | 14 | 22 | 194,198 | 356,398 |
| 2005-06-01 | 1.0769 | 14 | 13 | 132,023 | 152,633 |
| 2005-03-01 | 0.6383 | 30 | 47 | 808,100 | 1,023,228 |
| 2004-12-01 | 1.0 | 4 | 4 | 28,852 | 14,518 |
| 2004-09-01 | 0.7586 | 22 | 29 | 378,087 | 537,566 |
| 2004-06-01 | 0.9048 | 19 | 21 | 366,483 | 533,586 |
| 2004-03-01 | 0.5897 | 23 | 39 | 572,751 | 587,135 |
| 2003-12-01 | 0.75 | 12 | 16 | 384,600 | 352,904 |
| 2003-09-01 | 0.2 | 1 | 5 | 197.00 | 9,932 |
| 2003-06-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 165,000 | 35,810 |
MillerKnoll Notable Stakeholders
A MillerKnoll stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as MillerKnoll often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. MillerKnoll's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting MillerKnoll's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Andrea Owen | CEO President | Profile | |
| John Michael | President Contract | Profile | |
| Christopher Baldwin | Group President | Profile | |
| Benjamin Groom | President Contract | Profile | |
| Debbie Propst | President Retail | Profile | |
| Jeffrey Kurburski | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Jacqueline Rice | General Secretary | Profile | |
| Richard Scott | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Bruce Watson | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Kevin Veltman | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Wendy Watson | Vice Relations | Profile | |
| Timothy Straker | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Jeffrey Stutz | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Megan Lyon | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Antonella Pilo | Investor Finance | Profile |
About MillerKnoll Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as MillerKnoll often depends on how effective the management is. MillerKnoll management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of MillerKnoll management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the MillerKnoll management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.02) | (0.02) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| Return On Assets | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
| Return On Equity | (0.03) | (0.02) |
MillerKnoll Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as MillerKnoll use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare MillerKnoll within its industry.MillerKnoll Manpower Efficiency
Return on MillerKnoll Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 353.5K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 244.7M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 3.6K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 2.5M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 39K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 27M |
Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in MillerKnoll. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in state. To learn how to invest in MillerKnoll Stock, please use our How to Invest in MillerKnoll guide.You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..
Is Commercial Services & Supplies space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of MillerKnoll. If investors know MillerKnoll will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about MillerKnoll listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.29) | Dividend Share 0.75 | Earnings Share (0.37) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.02) |
The market value of MillerKnoll is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of MillerKnoll that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of MillerKnoll's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is MillerKnoll's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because MillerKnoll's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect MillerKnoll's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between MillerKnoll's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if MillerKnoll is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, MillerKnoll's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.