NET Power Company Insiders
NPWR Stock | 12.64 0.09 0.72% |
NET Power's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading NET Power stock suggests that virtually all insiders are panicking at this time. NET Power employs about 43 people. The company is managed by 12 executives with a total tenure of roughly 101 years, averaging almost 8.0 years of service per executive, having 3.58 employees per reported executive.
NET Power's Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-11-20 | 8 Rivers Capital, Llc | Disposed 320371 @ 12.6 | View | ||
2024-10-16 | 8 Rivers Capital, Llc | Disposed 517618 @ 7.12 | View | ||
2024-10-11 | Npeh, Llc | Disposed 120500 @ 6.92 | View | ||
2024-10-09 | Npeh, Llc | Disposed 122591 @ 6.95 | View | ||
2024-10-07 | 8 Rivers Capital, Llc | Disposed 8871 @ 7.01 | View | ||
2024-10-03 | 8 Rivers Capital, Llc | Disposed 10433 @ 7 | View | ||
2024-09-30 | 8 Rivers Capital, Llc | Disposed 46585 @ 7.07 | View | ||
2024-09-23 | 8 Rivers Capital, Llc | Disposed 1764 @ 7 | View | ||
2024-09-20 | 8 Rivers Capital, Llc | Disposed 26926 @ 7 | View | ||
2024-09-18 | 8 Rivers Capital, Llc | Disposed 80122 @ 7.02 | View | ||
2024-09-16 | Npeh, Llc | Disposed 36752 @ 7.05 | View | ||
2024-09-13 | Npeh, Llc | Disposed 1340 @ 7.26 | View | ||
2024-09-11 | Npeh, Llc | Disposed 21155 @ 7.28 | View | ||
2024-09-09 | Npeh, Llc | Disposed 60022 @ 7.6 | View | ||
2024-09-06 | Npeh, Llc | Disposed 66825 @ 7.88 | View | ||
2024-09-04 | Npeh, Llc | Disposed 83325 @ 8.1 | View | ||
2024-05-23 | Sk Inc. | Disposed 2500000 @ 10.04 | View |
Monitoring NET Power's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
NET |
NET Power Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0374) % which means that it has lost $0.0374 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (0.0393) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. NET Power's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well NET Power manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/25/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.11. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to -0.06. At this time, NET Power's Total Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/25/2024, Net Tangible Assets is likely to grow to about 61.2 M, while Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop (0.11).As of 11/25/2024, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to grow to about 43.7 M, while Net Loss is likely to drop (51.8 M).
NET Power Workforce Comparison
NET Power is regarded fifth in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is now estimated at about 13,066. NET Power adds roughly 43.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Industrials industry.
NET Power Insider Trading
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific NET Power insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on NET Power's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, NET Power insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
NET Power Notable Stakeholders
A NET Power stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as NET Power often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. NET Power's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting NET Power's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Daniel IV | CEO Director | Profile | |
Brian Allen | President COO | Profile | |
Bryce Mendes | Director Relations | Profile | |
Jessica Jones | VP Controller | Profile | |
Xijia Lu | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Mark Lennon | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Amy Keyser | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Akash Patel | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Scott Martin | Chief Officer | Profile | |
James Mahon | General Counsel | Profile | |
Jill Cartwright | Vice Relations | Profile | |
Kelly Rosser | Chief Officer | Profile |
About NET Power Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as NET Power often depends on how effective the management is. NET Power management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of NET management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the NET management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | (0.10) | (0.11) | |
Return On Capital Employed | (0.05) | (0.06) | |
Return On Assets | (0.03) | (0.03) | |
Return On Equity | (0.10) | (0.10) |
NET Power Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as NET Power use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare NET Power within its industry.NET Power Manpower Efficiency
Return on NET Power Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 4.1K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 14.6K | |
Net Loss Per Employee | 1.8M | |
Net Loss Per Executive | 6.4M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 14.6M | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 52.4M |
Additional Tools for NET Stock Analysis
When running NET Power's price analysis, check to measure NET Power's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy NET Power is operating at the current time. Most of NET Power's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of NET Power's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move NET Power's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of NET Power to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.