Fort St Company Top Insiders
| OARFF Stock | USD 0.02 0.04 62.00% |
Fort St employs about 13 people. The company is managed by 7 executives with a total tenure of roughly 21 years, averaging almost 3.0 years of service per executive, having 1.86 employees per reported executive. Examination of Fort St's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
| BA CPA Insider Chief Officer |
| Nick Daniel Insider Consultant |
Fort |
Fort St Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (8.3077) % which means that it has lost $8.3077 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Fort St's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Fort St manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Fort St Workforce Comparison
Fort St James is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry is now estimated at about 62.0. Fort St totals roughly 13.0 in number of employees claiming about 21% of all equities under Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry.
Fort St James Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Fort St James Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Fort St price series and its benchmark/peer.
Fort St Notable Stakeholders
A Fort St stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Fort St often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Fort St's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Fort St's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Scott Kent | Corporate Secretary, Director and Member of Audit Committee | Profile | |
| Carlos Arias | VP of International Projects and Director | Profile | |
| Barry Brown | Director | Profile | |
| BA CPA | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Nick Daniel | Consultant | Profile | |
| Jennifer Lamb | Controller | Profile | |
| Steve Mynott | CoPres | Profile |
About Fort St Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Fort St James often depends on how effective the management is. Fort St management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Fort management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Fort management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
James Nickel Corp., a junior mineral exploration company, engages in the acquisition, evaluation, and exploration of mineral properties in North America. The company was incorporated in 1988 and is based in Vancouver, Canada. Fort ST operates under Other Industrial Metals Mining classification in the United States and is traded on OTC Exchange.
Fort St Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Fort St use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Fort St within its industry.Fort St Manpower Efficiency
Return on Fort St Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 0.0 | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 0.0 | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 55.4K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 102.9K |
Complementary Tools for Fort Pink Sheet analysis
When running Fort St's price analysis, check to measure Fort St's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Fort St is operating at the current time. Most of Fort St's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Fort St's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Fort St's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Fort St to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing |