Obsidian Energy Company Executives
| OBE Stock | CAD 9.84 0.20 1.99% |
Obsidian Energy employs about 203 people. The company is managed by 16 executives with a total tenure of roughly 117 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 12.69 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Obsidian Energy's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Stephen Loukas CEO Interim President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
| Michael Faust CEO Interim President, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Obsidian |
Obsidian Energy Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0829) % which means that it has lost $0.0829 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of (0.1528) %, meaning that it generated substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Obsidian Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Obsidian Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 31st of January 2026, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to -0.1. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to -0.15. At this time, Obsidian Energy's Other Current Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 31st of January 2026, Net Tangible Assets is likely to grow to about 1.9 B, while Total Assets are likely to drop about 1.8 B.As of the 31st of January 2026, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 61.6 M. In addition to that, Net Loss is likely to drop to about (244.6 M)Obsidian Energy owns a total of 67.12 Million outstanding shares. Obsidian Energy holds 8.14 pct. of its outstanding shares held by insiders and 28.62 pct. owned by third-party entities. Please note that no matter how many assets the company maintains, if the real value of the company is less than the current market value, you may not be able to make money on it.
Shares in Circulation | First Issued 2005-06-30 | Previous Quarter 73.3 M | Current Value 68.9 M | Avarage Shares Outstanding 66 M | Quarterly Volatility 15.8 M |
Obsidian Energy Workforce Comparison
Obsidian Energy is regarded fourth in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Energy industry is now estimated at about 2,127. Obsidian Energy holds roughly 203 in number of employees claiming about 10% of equities under Energy industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of (0.39) %, which may suggest that it does not properly executes on its current pricing strategies or is unable to control all of the operational costs. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.22 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.22. Obsidian Energy Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Obsidian Energy Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Obsidian Energy price series and its benchmark/peer.
Obsidian Energy Notable Stakeholders
An Obsidian Energy stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Obsidian Energy often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Obsidian Energy's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Obsidian Energy's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Stephen Loukas | Interim President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
| Michael Faust | Interim President, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
| Gordon Ritchie | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Andrew Sweerts | Vice President - Business Development and Commercial | Profile | |
| Peter Scott | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
| Mark Hodgson | Vice President - Business Development and Commercial | Profile | |
| Aaron Smith | Senior Vice President - Development and Operations | Profile | |
| John Brydson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| William Friley | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Maureen Jackson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Raymond Crossley | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Edward Kernaghan | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Jay McGilvary | Senior Development | Profile | |
| William Swadling | Vice Operations | Profile | |
| Gary Sykes | Vice President - Commercial | Profile | |
| Mark Hawkins | Vice President - Legal, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | Profile |
About Obsidian Energy Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Obsidian Energy often depends on how effective the management is. Obsidian Energy management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Obsidian management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Obsidian management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.11) | (0.10) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | (0.16) | (0.15) | |
| Return On Assets | (0.11) | (0.10) | |
| Return On Equity | (0.14) | (0.17) |
Obsidian Energy Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Obsidian Energy use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Obsidian Energy within its industry.Obsidian Energy Manpower Efficiency
Return on Obsidian Energy Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 4.1M | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 52.4M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 998K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 12.7M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 1.1M | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 13.6M |
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Obsidian Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. To learn how to invest in Obsidian Stock, please use our How to Invest in Obsidian Energy guide.You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.