Pitney Bowes Company Top Insiders
| PBI Stock | USD 10.78 0.20 1.89% |
Under 67% of Pitney Bowes' corporate insiders are selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Pitney Bowes stock suggests that many insiders are alarmed at this time. Pitney Bowes employs about 7.2 K people. The company is managed by 48 executives with a total tenure of roughly 243 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 150.0 employees per reported executive.
| Marc Lautenbach CEO CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee |
| Michael Roth Chairman Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board |
Insider Sentiment 33
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2025-11-25 | Brent D Rosenthal | Acquired 2000 @ 10 | View | ||
| 2025-09-03 | Brent D Rosenthal | Acquired 3000 @ 11.97 | View | ||
| 2025-07-14 | Deborah Pfeiffer | Disposed 35000 @ 12.14 | View | ||
| 2025-05-09 | Catherine Levene | Acquired 200 @ 9.37 | View | ||
| 2025-04-23 | Lauren Freemen-Bosworth | Disposed 2045 @ 8.4 | View | ||
| 2025-03-03 | Kurt James Wolf | Disposed 481199 @ 10.77 | View | ||
| 2025-02-26 | James Arthur Fairweather | Disposed 130000 @ 10.83 | View | ||
| 2025-02-14 | Kurt James Wolf | Disposed 78285 @ 10.66 | View | ||
| 2025-02-12 | Kurt James Wolf | Disposed 1250000 @ 9.66 | View |
Monitoring Pitney Bowes' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Pitney Bowes. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. Pitney Bowes' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Pitney Bowes' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Pitney will maintain a workforce of under 32540 employees by March 2026.Pitney Bowes Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0529 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0529 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1097 %, implying that it generated $0.1097 on every 100 dollars invested. Pitney Bowes' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Pitney Bowes manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The current Return On Tangible Assets is estimated to decrease to 0. The current Return On Capital Employed is estimated to decrease to 0.18. As of now, Pitney Bowes' Deferred Long Term Asset Charges is decreasing as compared to previous years.The Pitney Bowes' current Common Stock Shares Outstanding is estimated to increase to about 194.7 M, while Net Loss is forecasted to increase to (174.1 M). Pitney Bowes owns a total of 160.92 Million outstanding shares. The majority of Pitney Bowes outstanding shares are owned by third-party entities. These institutional holders are usually referred to as non-private investors looking to secure positions in Pitney Bowes to benefit from reduced commissions. Consequently, institutional investors are subject to a different set of regulations than regular investors in Pitney Bowes. Please pay attention to any change in the institutional holdings of Pitney Bowes as this could imply that something significant has changed or is about to change at the company. Please note that no matter how many assets the company maintains, if the real value of the company is less than the current market value, you may not be able to make money on it.
Shares in Circulation | First Issued 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 181 M | Current Value 181 M | Avarage Shares Outstanding 240.3 M | Quarterly Volatility 51.5 M |
Pitney Bowes Workforce Comparison
Pitney Bowes is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is at this time estimated at about 26,589. Pitney Bowes totals roughly 7,200 in number of employees claiming about 27% of equities under Industrials industry.
Pitney Bowes Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.04 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.21 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.21 of operating income.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.64 | 0.6 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.19 | 0.18 |
|
|
Pitney Bowes Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Pitney Bowes insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Pitney Bowes' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Pitney Bowes insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-01 | 2.0 | 8 | 4 | 3,107,664 | 6,410,860 |
| 2025-09-01 | 0.8333 | 10 | 12 | 114,715 | 373,529 |
| 2025-06-01 | 1.0526 | 20 | 19 | 547,919 | 1,971,056 |
| 2025-03-01 | 0.5349 | 23 | 43 | 480,999 | 2,630,775 |
| 2024-12-01 | 2.25 | 18 | 8 | 2,240,319 | 365,408 |
| 2024-09-01 | 0.5833 | 7 | 12 | 174,135 | 201,219 |
| 2024-06-01 | 1.75 | 21 | 12 | 844,987 | 305,379 |
| 2024-03-01 | 0.6806 | 49 | 72 | 1,484,536 | 603,887 |
| 2023-12-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 59,284 | 3,954 |
| 2023-06-01 | 1.4444 | 13 | 9 | 334,195 | 118,812 |
| 2023-03-01 | 0.7895 | 30 | 38 | 1,631,431 | 285,132 |
| 2022-06-01 | 1.8571 | 13 | 7 | 219,584 | 94,465 |
| 2022-03-01 | 0.5833 | 28 | 48 | 1,701,723 | 423,787 |
| 2021-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 11,859 | 11,859 |
| 2021-06-01 | 1.8889 | 17 | 9 | 360,443 | 237,837 |
| 2021-03-01 | 0.7429 | 26 | 35 | 1,209,990 | 630,735 |
| 2020-09-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 19,859 | 52,764 |
| 2020-06-01 | 2.1429 | 15 | 7 | 391,379 | 121,107 |
| 2020-03-01 | 0.8611 | 31 | 36 | 3,715,203 | 226,037 |
| 2019-12-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 17,648 | 2,686 |
| 2019-09-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 17,910 | 17,910 |
| 2019-06-01 | 2.625 | 21 | 8 | 266,617 | 90,808 |
| 2019-03-01 | 0.7857 | 33 | 42 | 1,595,582 | 547,365 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.5714 | 4 | 7 | 35,608 | 79,206 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2.7143 | 19 | 7 | 178,773 | 44,163 |
| 2018-03-01 | 0.8387 | 52 | 62 | 2,629,407 | 518,547 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.2 | 1 | 5 | 3,703 | 8,402 |
| 2017-06-01 | 3.2 | 16 | 5 | 95,515 | 27,425 |
| 2017-03-01 | 1.2333 | 74 | 60 | 3,112,810 | 603,064 |
| 2016-09-01 | 0.8 | 4 | 5 | 17,994 | 15,989 |
| 2016-06-01 | 3.5 | 14 | 4 | 72,462 | 17,612 |
| 2016-03-01 | 0.925 | 74 | 80 | 1,858,782 | 255,998 |
| 2015-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 3,123 | 0.00 |
| 2015-03-01 | 0.7692 | 50 | 65 | 749,751 | 284,130 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 26,738 | 36,624 |
| 2014-06-01 | 2.1667 | 13 | 6 | 61,136 | 28,276 |
| 2014-03-01 | 1.1351 | 42 | 37 | 544,652 | 108,799 |
| 2013-09-01 | 1.8 | 9 | 5 | 446,271 | 18,636 |
| 2013-06-01 | 4.5 | 18 | 4 | 204,721 | 0.00 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.6512 | 56 | 86 | 918,505 | 270,975 |
| 2012-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1,856 | 0.00 |
| 2012-03-01 | 1.129 | 35 | 31 | 409,838 | 142,100 |
| 2011-09-01 | 0.2 | 1 | 5 | 1,500 | 5,580 |
| 2011-06-01 | 5.0 | 10 | 2 | 22,000 | 0.00 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.9211 | 35 | 38 | 913,871 | 88,187 |
| 2010-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 18,163 | 150.00 |
| 2010-06-01 | 12.0 | 12 | 1 | 26,400 | 1,383 |
| 2010-03-01 | 1.4 | 35 | 25 | 1,181,138 | 52,729 |
| 2009-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 11,629 | 151.00 |
| 2009-09-01 | 9.0 | 9 | 1 | 22,160 | 1,014 |
| 2009-03-01 | 4.0 | 24 | 6 | 996,358 | 14,868 |
| 2008-09-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 160,000 | 850.00 |
| 2008-06-01 | 6.0 | 12 | 2 | 26,400 | 5,943 |
| 2008-03-01 | 2.0 | 12 | 6 | 1,262,536 | 24,576 |
| 2007-12-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 2,847 | 4,294 |
| 2007-09-01 | 0.3846 | 5 | 13 | 43,226 | 77,480 |
| 2007-06-01 | 1.4 | 21 | 15 | 86,205 | 112,150 |
| 2007-03-01 | 0.8889 | 40 | 45 | 951,559 | 114,830 |
| 2006-12-01 | 0.5 | 10 | 20 | 136,304 | 256,529 |
| 2006-09-01 | 0.5 | 6 | 12 | 60,474 | 112,522 |
| 2006-03-01 | 1.3333 | 24 | 18 | 876,019 | 57,078 |
| 2005-12-01 | 0.1538 | 2 | 13 | 8,149 | 12,893 |
| 2005-09-01 | 0.4 | 4 | 10 | 67,491 | 84,733 |
| 2005-06-01 | 2.2 | 11 | 5 | 16,434 | 7,453 |
| 2005-03-01 | 2.5 | 20 | 8 | 528,594 | 38,639 |
| 2004-12-01 | 0.4444 | 4 | 9 | 34,044 | 23,238 |
| 2004-06-01 | 2.3333 | 21 | 9 | 77,649 | 56,002 |
| 2004-03-01 | 2.4 | 12 | 5 | 544,409 | 43,794 |
| 2003-12-01 | 1.2 | 6 | 5 | 3,328 | 18,267 |
| 2003-09-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 6,477 | 12,954 |
Pitney Bowes Notable Stakeholders
A Pitney Bowes stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Pitney Bowes often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Pitney Bowes' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Pitney Bowes' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Kurt Wolf | CEO Director | Profile | |
| Marc Lautenbach | CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee | Profile | |
| Michael Roth | Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Jason Dies | Executive Vice President and President of Sending Technology Solutions | Profile | |
| Joseph Catapano | Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President Principal Accounting Officer | Profile | |
| Christoph Stehmann | Executive Vice President and Presidentident - Enterprise Solutions Group | Profile | |
| Adam David | Vice President Investor Relations | Profile | |
| Lila Snyder | Executive Vice President, President - Global Ecommerce | Profile | |
| Stanley Sutula | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Daniel Goldstein | Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
| Johnna Torsone | Chief Human Resources Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Ana Chadwick | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Gregg Zegras | Executive Vice President and President of Global Ecommerce | Profile | |
| Robert Gold | Executive CFO | Profile | |
| Paul CPA | CFO VP | Profile | |
| Anne Busquet | Independent Director | Profile | |
| David Shedlarz | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Anne Fuchs | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Lance Rosenzweig | Interim Director | Profile | |
| Robert Dutkowsky | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Sheila Stamps | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Mary Guilfoile | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Stewart Hutcheson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Linda Sanford | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Philip Landler | VP Strategy | Profile | |
| Lauren DeFina | VP Officer | Profile | |
| Geoff Kupferschmid | VP Treasurer | Profile | |
| Lauren FreemanBosworth | General VP | Profile | |
| Alex Zelikovsky | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Ned Zachar | Vice President of Investor Relations | Profile | |
| Joseph Cpa | VP Officer | Profile | |
| James Fairweather | Executive Vice President Chief Innovation Officer | Profile | |
| William Borrelle | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Wes Kirschner | Senior Security | Profile | |
| Greta Wilson | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Todd Everett | Executive Solutions | Profile | |
| John Witek | Interim Officer | Profile | |
| Judy Morris | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Debbie Pfeiffer | Executive Services | Profile | |
| Ned CFA | VP Relations | Profile | |
| Andrew Gold | Senior Vice President Chief Human Resource Officer | Profile | |
| William Hughes | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Shemin Nurmohamed | Executive Solutions | Profile | |
| Harris Warsaw | Senior Solutions | Profile | |
| Joseph Schmitt | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Christopher Johnson | Senior Services | Profile | |
| Ruchi Bhalla | Senior Transformation | Profile | |
| Andrew JD | Senior Officer | Profile |
About Pitney Bowes Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Pitney Bowes often depends on how effective the management is. Pitney Bowes management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Pitney management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Pitney management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.21 | 0.18 | |
| Return On Equity | (0.02) | (0.02) |
Pitney Bowes Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Pitney Bowes use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Pitney Bowes within its industry.Pitney Bowes Manpower Efficiency
Return on Pitney Bowes Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 281.5K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 42.2M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 14.2K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 2.1M |
Complementary Tools for Pitney Stock analysis
When running Pitney Bowes' price analysis, check to measure Pitney Bowes' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Pitney Bowes is operating at the current time. Most of Pitney Bowes' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Pitney Bowes' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Pitney Bowes' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Pitney Bowes to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
| Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
| Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance |