Procter Gamble (Argentina) Top Management

Procter Gamble Management Team Effectiveness

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0955 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0955 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3202 %, meaning that it generated $0.3202 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Procter Gamble's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Procter Gamble manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.

Procter Gamble Workforce Comparison

The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.18 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.23 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.23.

Procter Gamble DRC Benchmark Summation

Procter Gamble Notable Stakeholders

The success or failure of an entity such as Procter Gamble DRC often depends on how effective the management is. Procter Gamble management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Procter management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Procter management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.

Please note, the presentation of Procter Gamble's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Procter Gamble's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Procter Gamble's management manipulating its earnings.

When running Procter Gamble's price analysis, check to measure Procter Gamble's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Procter Gamble is operating at the current time. Most of Procter Gamble's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Procter Gamble's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Procter Gamble's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Procter Gamble to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.