Rocky Mountain Company Top Management
RMHB Stock | USD 0.01 0 29.23% |
Rocky Mountain employs about 5 people. The company is managed by 5 executives with a total tenure of roughly 12 years, averaging almost 2.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Rocky Mountain's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Charles Smith Insider Chairman COO |
Jason Robillard Insider Head Products |
Rocky |
Rocky Mountain Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.902) % which means that it has lost $0.902 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Rocky Mountain's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Rocky Mountain manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Rocky Mountain Workforce Comparison
Rocky Mountain High is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Beverages—Non-Alcoholic industry is at this time estimated at about 183,103. Rocky Mountain adds roughly 5.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of stocks in Beverages—Non-Alcoholic industry.
Rocky Mountain High Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Rocky Mountain High Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Rocky Mountain price series and its benchmark/peer.
Rocky Mountain Notable Stakeholders
A Rocky Mountain stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Rocky Mountain often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Rocky Mountain's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Rocky Mountain's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Charles Smith | Chairman COO | Profile | |
Jason Robillard | Head Products | Profile | |
Jens Mielke | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Saldi | VP Marketing | Profile | |
David Seeberger | President, CEO | Profile |
About Rocky Mountain Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Rocky Mountain High often depends on how effective the management is. Rocky Mountain management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Rocky management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Rocky management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. operates as a lifestyle brand management company. The company was formerly known as Totally Hemp Crazy Inc. and changed its name to Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. in October 2014. Rocky Mountain operates under BeveragesNon-Alcoholic classification in the United States and is traded on OTC Exchange. It employs 5 people.
Please note, the presentation of Rocky Mountain's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Rocky Mountain's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Rocky Mountain's management manipulating its earnings.
Rocky Mountain Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Rocky Mountain use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Rocky Mountain within its industry.Rocky Mountain Manpower Efficiency
Return on Rocky Mountain Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 41K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 41K | |
Net Loss Per Employee | 1.1M | |
Net Loss Per Executive | 1.1M |
Complementary Tools for Rocky Pink Sheet analysis
When running Rocky Mountain's price analysis, check to measure Rocky Mountain's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Rocky Mountain is operating at the current time. Most of Rocky Mountain's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Rocky Mountain's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Rocky Mountain's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Rocky Mountain to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity |