Under Armour (Brazil) Top Management

Under Armour Management Team Effectiveness

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0655 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0655 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.1913 %, meaning that it generated $0.1913 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Under Armour's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Under Armour manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.

Under Armour Workforce Comparison

The company has Profit Margin (PM) of (0.06) %, which may suggest that it does not properly executes on its current pricing strategies or is unable to control all of the operational costs. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of (0.02) %, which suggests for every $100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating loss of $0.02.

Under Armour Benchmark Summation

Under Armour Notable Stakeholders

The success or failure of an entity such as Under Armour often depends on how effective the management is. Under Armour management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Under management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Under management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.

Please note, the presentation of Under Armour's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Under Armour's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Under Armour's management manipulating its earnings.

When running Under Armour's price analysis, check to measure Under Armour's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Under Armour is operating at the current time. Most of Under Armour's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Under Armour's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Under Armour's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Under Armour to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.