Designer Net Income Applicable To Common Shares from 2010 to 2026
| DBI Stock | USD 6.59 0.00 0.00% |
Net Loss | First Reported 2000-01-31 | Previous Quarter 10.8 M | Current Value 18.2 M | Quarterly Volatility 47.4 M |
Check Designer Brands financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among Designer Brands' main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Interest Expense of 56.1 M, Selling General Administrative of 597.3 M or Total Revenue of 2.2 B, as well as many indicators such as Price To Sales Ratio of 0.098, Dividend Yield of 0.0354 or PTB Ratio of 1.06. Designer financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with Designer Brands Valuation or Volatility modules.
Designer | Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | Build AI portfolio with Designer Stock |
The Net Income Applicable To Common Shares trend for Designer Brands offers valuable insights into the company's financial trajectory and strategic direction. By examining multi-year patterns, investors can identify whether Designer Brands is strengthening or weakening its position, and how this metric correlates with broader market conditions and industry benchmarks.
Latest Designer Brands' Net Income Applicable To Common Shares Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Income Applicable To Common Shares of Designer Brands over the last few years. It is the net income that remains after preferred dividends have been deducted, available to common shareholders. Designer Brands' Net Loss historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Designer Brands' overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares |
| Timeline |
Designer Net Income Applicable To Common Shares Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | 52,256,794 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | 299.01 | |
| Mean Deviation | 98,847,654 | |
| Median | 94,497,000 | |
| Standard Deviation | 156,252,471 | |
| Sample Variance | 24414.8T | |
| Range | 663.5M | |
| R-Value | (0.34) | |
| Mean Square Error | 23049.6T | |
| R-Squared | 0.11 | |
| Significance | 0.18 | |
| Slope | (10,489,718) | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 390637.4T |
Designer Net Income Applicable To Common Shares History
About Designer Brands Financial Statements
Investors use fundamental indicators, such as Designer Brands' Net Income Applicable To Common Shares, to determine how well the company is positioned to perform in the future. Although Designer Brands' investors may analyze each financial statement separately, they are all interrelated. Understanding these patterns can help investors make the right trading decisions.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Loss | -9.5 M | -9 M |
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
| FSLY | Fastly Class A | |
| MOB | Mobilicom Limited American | |
| CMG | Chipotle Mexican Grill | |
| CSAN | Cosan SA ADR | |
| RKT | Rocket Companies |
Check out the analysis of Designer Brands Correlation against competitors. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.
Is there potential for Specialty Retail market expansion? Will Designer introduce new products? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. Projected growth potential of Designer fundamentally drives upward valuation adjustments. Understanding fair value requires weighing current performance against future potential. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.458 | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share (0.46) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.03) |
Designer Brands's market price often diverges from its book value, the accounting figure shown on Designer's balance sheet. Smart investors calculate Designer Brands' intrinsic value - its true economic worth - which may differ significantly from both market price and book value. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. Since Designer Brands' trading price responds to investor sentiment, macroeconomic conditions, and market psychology, it can swing far from fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Designer Brands' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Designer Brands should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.