Terrestrial Net Debt from 2010 to 2026
| IMSRW Stock | 4.14 0.28 6.33% |
Net Debt | First Reported 2010-12-31 | Previous Quarter 16.1 M | Current Value 11.2 M | Quarterly Volatility 3 M |
Check Terrestrial Energy financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among Terrestrial Energy's main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Tax Provision of 25.3 K, Interest Income of 67 K or Depreciation And Amortization of 1.2 M, as well as many indicators such as Price To Sales Ratio of 9.2 K, Dividend Yield of 0.0 or Days Sales Outstanding of 409. Terrestrial financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with Terrestrial Energy Valuation or Volatility modules.
Terrestrial | Build AI portfolio with Terrestrial Stock |
The evolution of Net Debt for Terrestrial Energy provides essential context for understanding the company's financial health trajectory. By analyzing this metric's behavior over time, investors can assess whether recent trends align with long-term patterns, and how Terrestrial Energy compares to historical norms and industry peers.
Latest Terrestrial Energy's Net Debt Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Debt of Terrestrial Energy over the last few years. It is the total debt of a company minus its cash and cash equivalents. It represents the actual debt burden on the company after accounting for the liquid assets it holds. Terrestrial Energy's Net Debt historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Terrestrial Energy's overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| Net Debt | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Debt |
| Timeline |
Terrestrial Net Debt Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | 7,669,139 | |
| Geometric Mean | 7,280,488 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | 39.38 | |
| Mean Deviation | 2,140,346 | |
| Median | 6,369,643 | |
| Standard Deviation | 3,019,982 | |
| Sample Variance | 9.1T | |
| Range | 9.7M | |
| R-Value | 0.62 | |
| Mean Square Error | 6T | |
| R-Squared | 0.39 | |
| Significance | 0.01 | |
| Slope | 372,207 | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 145.9T |
Terrestrial Net Debt History
Other Fundumenentals of Terrestrial Energy
Terrestrial Energy Net Debt component correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About Terrestrial Energy Financial Statements
Terrestrial Energy investors use historical fundamental indicators, such as Terrestrial Energy's Net Debt, to determine how well the company is positioned to perform in the future. Understanding over-time patterns can help investors decide on long-term investments in Terrestrial Energy. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Debt | 16.1 M | 11.2 M | |
| Net Debt To EBITDA | (1.81) | (1.90) |
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Additional Tools for Terrestrial Stock Analysis
When running Terrestrial Energy's price analysis, check to measure Terrestrial Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Terrestrial Energy is operating at the current time. Most of Terrestrial Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Terrestrial Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Terrestrial Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Terrestrial Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.