Fortune Brands Stock Forward View - Polynomial Regression
| FBIN Stock | 39.92 -0.01 -0.03% |
Polynomial Regression is applied to Fortune Brands Innovations's daily closing prices, and the resulting forecast is presented with accuracy metrics. Wide deviation between fitted and observed values suggests the model's assumptions may not match current market conditions. These values update automatically with each new closing price. AIC measures relative model quality — lower AIC values indicate a better-fitting model. The Polynomial Regression model projects Fortune Brands at 41.48 for the next trading day, above the most recent closing price. This Polynomial Regression output is provided as analytical reference and does not constitute a trading recommendation.
Polynomial Regression Price Forecast For the 8th of May
Over a 90-day horizon, the Polynomial Regression model forecasts Fortune Brands at 41.48 for the next trading day, with a mean absolute deviation of 1.76 , mean absolute percentage error of 0.04 , and sum of absolute errors of 107.29 .This represents a tight forecast with good short-term tracking of Fortune Brands' price movement. This output is intended for short-term analytical reference.
Stock Forecast Pattern
| Backtest Fortune Brands | Fortune Brands Price Prediction | Research Analysis |
Forecasted Value
This forecast for Fortune Brands frames the expected trading range using downside and upside bounds rather than a single point target. Downside is estimated near 38.00 and upside near 44.96. The wide range indicates elevated uncertainty in short-term projections.
Model Predictive Factors
The table below summarizes the Polynomial Regression model's error metrics for Fortune Brands stock. Lower MAD and MAPE values indicate tighter forecast accuracy. AIC measures relative model quality — lower values indicate less information loss and a better-fitting model. A large Bias suggests systematic over- or under-prediction.| AIC | Akaike Information Criteria | 119.672 |
| Bias | Arithmetic mean of the errors | None |
| MAD | Mean absolute deviation | 1.7588 |
| MAPE | Mean absolute percentage error | 0.039 |
| SAE | Sum of the absolute errors | 107.2895 |
Other Forecasting Options for Fortune Brands
The distribution of Fortune Brands' daily returns is typically non-normal, with fatter tails than a Gaussian model predicts. This reveals hidden support and resistance zones in Fortune Brands' chart that simple price charts miss. The slope of Fortune Brands' linear regression channel quantifies trend direction and strength over a chosen lookback period. Divergences between OBV and price foreshadow trend changes in Fortune Brands.Fortune Brands Related Equities
These stocks are related to Fortune Brands within the Industrials space and can be used for peer review, pricing, or spreading risk. Growth rate gaps between Fortune Brands and its peers often explain pricing differences in the market. A stock that beats its peers on many metrics often deserves a closer look from value-focused investors. This type of review is most informative when done often to track how positions shift over time.
| Risk & Return | Correlation |
Fortune Brands Market Strength Events
Market strength indicators for Fortune Brands stock provide a framework for assessing security responsiveness. A rising Accumulation/Distribution line alongside rising price confirms institutional buying interest in Fortune Brands. Median and Typical Price smooth out intraday extremes, providing a cleaner reference level for evaluating Fortune Brands sessions. Persistent divergence between momentum indicators and price often precedes trend reversals in Fortune Brands.
| Rate Of Daily Change | 1.0 | |||
| Day Median Price | 39.92 | |||
| Day Typical Price | 39.92 | |||
| Price Action Indicator | -0.01 | |||
| Period Momentum Indicator | -0.01 | |||
| Relative Strength Index | 38.3 |
Fortune Brands Risk Indicators
Assessing Fortune Brands' risk indicators is a structured way to evaluate the risk-return trade-off for fortune brands stock. The level of risk embedded in Fortune Brands' feeds directly into exposure calibration. Comparing Fortune Brands' downside variance to total variance reveals whether the risk profile is skewed toward losses. These risk measures complement the price analysis above by framing how dispersed recent returns have been.
| Mean Deviation | 2.46 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 3.64 | |||
| Variance | 13.26 |
Please note, the risk measures we provide can be used independently or collectively to perform a risk assessment. When comparing two potential investments, we recommend comparing similar equities with homogenous growth potential and valuation from related markets to determine which investment holds the most risk.
Fortune Brands Short Properties
Reviewing short-oriented indicators for Fortune Brands is useful because long and short participants often create very different signals for timing and volatility. This is applicable when the question is whether bearish pressure is starting to shape the market's reaction function.
| Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 121.2 million | |
| Cash And Short Term Investments | 264 million |