FT Cboe ETF Forward View - Polynomial Regression
| FJUN ETF | USD 59.39 0.07 0.12% |
FT Cboe Vest's Polynomial Regression forecast is generated from the selected price series and evaluated against observed values. Forecast accuracy depends on how stable the recent price trend has been — trending markets suit some models better than others. The forecast is recalculated with each session so it does not rely on stale inputs. A small Bias confirms the model is not systematically over- or under-predicting. The Polynomial Regression model projects FT Cboe at 59.96 for the next trading day, above the most recent closing price. All values shown are model-generated projections and should be evaluated alongside other analytical inputs.
Polynomial Regression Price Forecast For the 11th of May 2026
Over a 90-day horizon, the Polynomial Regression model forecasts FT Cboe at 59.96 for the next trading day, with a mean absolute deviation of 0.40 , mean absolute percentage error of 0.01 , and sum of absolute errors of 24.22 .This represents a very tight forecast — the model closely tracks FT Cboe's recent price behavior. This output is intended for short-term analytical reference.
ETF Forecast Pattern
| Backtest FT Cboe | FT Cboe Price Prediction | Research Analysis |
Forecasted Value
The projected range for FT Cboe reflects the model's ability to define credible downside and upside scenarios for the next trading day. The model places downside around 59.47 and upside around 60.45 for the next session. The narrow range indicates limited short-term dispersion.
Model Predictive Factors
The table below summarizes the Polynomial Regression model's error metrics for FT Cboe ETF. Lower MAD and MAPE values indicate tighter forecast accuracy. AIC measures relative model quality — lower values indicate less information loss and a better-fitting model. A large Bias suggests systematic over- or under-prediction.| AIC | Akaike Information Criteria | 116.7192 |
| Bias | Arithmetic mean of the errors | None |
| MAD | Mean absolute deviation | 0.397 |
| MAPE | Mean absolute percentage error | 0.0069 |
| SAE | Sum of the absolute errors | 24.2163 |
Other Forecasting Options for FT Cboe
MACD analysis of FJUN tracks the relationship between two exponential moving averages of FT Cboe's price. Many FT Cboe's traders use Fibonacci levels to set entry and exit targets based on prior price swings. Average True Range measures the typical daily price swing for FJUN, accounting for gaps. The frequency and magnitude of gaps reveal how much new information is being priced into FJUN outside regular hours.FT Cboe Comparable Funds
The instruments listed below are comparable funds for FT Cboe and provide a practical reference set. This peer set gives investors a way to compare FT Cboe's structure and outcomes against similar portfolio vehicles. Category-relative analysis helps separate fund-specific behavior from broader market moves affecting the whole group.
| Risk & Return | Correlation |
FT Cboe Market Strength Events
Market strength indicators for FT Cboe quantify how the ETF responds to shifts in volume and sentiment. These indicators capture shifts in momentum that may precede significant price moves in FT Cboe. The Market Facilitation Index measures how efficiently price moves relative to volume — rising MFI with rising volume signals strong trend participation. Monitoring these indicators for FT Cboe through complete market cycles reveals recurring patterns.
FT Cboe Risk Indicators
Analyzing FT Cboe's risk indicators separates symmetric price swings from asymmetric downside exposure. Understanding and quantifying the risks present in FT Cboe helps place recent price behavior in context. These metrics are most informative when compared against similar equities with comparable growth profiles and market capitalization. When semi-deviation is high relative to standard deviation, FT Cboe's losses have been disproportionately large compared to gains.
| Mean Deviation | 0.3611 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 0.3502 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 0.5068 | |||
| Variance | 0.2568 | |||
| Downside Variance | 0.2021 | |||
| Semi Variance | 0.1226 | |||
| Expected Short fall | -0.40 |
Please note, the risk measures we provide can be used independently or collectively to perform a risk assessment. When comparing two potential investments, we recommend comparing similar equities with homogenous growth potential and valuation from related markets to determine which investment holds the most risk.