Brinks Debt

BCO Stock  USD 99.55  3.00  3.11%   
At this time, Brinks' Net Debt To EBITDA is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 26th of November 2024, Debt To Equity is likely to grow to 8.86, while Cash Flow To Debt Ratio is likely to drop 0.20. With a high degree of financial leverage come high-interest payments, which usually reduce Brinks' Earnings Per Share (EPS).
 
Debt Ratio  
First Reported
2010-12-31
Previous Quarter
0.50819473
Current Value
0.53
Quarterly Volatility
0.16696176
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
At this time, Brinks' Total Current Liabilities is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 26th of November 2024, Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to grow to about 6.9 B, while Non Current Liabilities Other is likely to drop about 32 M.
  
Check out the analysis of Brinks Fundamentals Over Time.

Brinks Bond Ratings

Brinks Company financial ratings play a critical role in determining how much Brinks have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for Brinks' borrowing costs.
Piotroski F Score
4
PoorView
Beneish M Score
(2.86)
Unlikely ManipulatorView

Brinks Company Debt to Cash Allocation

As Brinks Company follows its natural business cycle, the capital allocation decisions will not magically go away. Brinks' decision-makers have to determine if most of the cash flows will be poured back into or reinvested in the business, reserved for other projects beyond operational needs, or paid back to stakeholders and investors.
Brinks Company has 3.88 B in debt. Brinks Company has a current ratio of 1.78, which is typical for the industry and considered as normal. Note however, debt could still be an excellent tool for Brinks to invest in growth at high rates of return.

Brinks Total Assets Over Time

Brinks Assets Financed by Debt

The debt-to-assets ratio shows the degree to which Brinks uses debt to finance its assets. It includes both long-term and short-term borrowings maturing within one year. It also includes both tangible and intangible assets, such as goodwill.

Brinks Debt Ratio

    
  53.0   
It appears that about 47% of Brinks' assets are financed be debt. Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Brinks' operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Brinks, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.

Brinks Corporate Bonds Issued

Brinks issues bonds to finance its operations. Corporate bonds make up one of the most significant components of the U.S. bond market and are considered the world's largest securities market. Brinks Company uses the proceeds from bond sales for a wide variety of purposes, including financing ongoing mergers and acquisitions, buying new equipment, investing in research and development, buying back their own stock, paying dividends to shareholders, and even refinancing existing debt.

Brinks Short Long Term Debt Total

Short Long Term Debt Total

4.07 Billion

At this time, Brinks' Short and Long Term Debt Total is very stable compared to the past year.

Understaning Brinks Use of Financial Leverage

Leverage ratios show Brinks' total debt position, including all outstanding obligations. In simple terms, high financial leverage means that the cost of production, along with the day-to-day running of the business, is high. Conversely, lower financial leverage implies lower fixed cost investment in the business, which is generally considered a good sign by investors. The degree of Brinks' financial leverage can be measured in several ways, including ratios such as the debt-to-equity ratio (total debt / total equity), or the debt ratio (total debt / total assets).
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Short and Long Term Debt Total3.9 B4.1 B
Net Debt2.7 B2.8 B
Short Term Debt348.3 M365.7 M
Long Term Debt3.3 B3.4 B
Long Term Debt Total3.8 BB
Short and Long Term Debt268.8 M282.2 M
Net Debt To EBITDA 3.65  3.83 
Debt To Equity 8.44  8.86 
Interest Debt Per Share 77.03  80.88 
Debt To Assets 0.51  0.53 
Long Term Debt To Capitalization 0.89  0.93 
Total Debt To Capitalization 0.89  0.94 
Debt Equity Ratio 8.44  8.86 
Debt Ratio 0.51  0.53 
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio 0.21  0.20 
Please read more on our technical analysis page.

Pair Trading with Brinks

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Brinks position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Brinks will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving together with Brinks Stock

  0.81FA First Advantage CorpPairCorr

Moving against Brinks Stock

  0.85INOD InnodataPairCorr
  0.82DIST Distoken AcquisitionPairCorr
  0.81PYCR Paycor HCMPairCorr
  0.73KAR KAR Auction ServicesPairCorr
  0.72DRVN Driven Brands HoldingsPairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Brinks could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Brinks when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Brinks - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Brinks Company to buy it.
The correlation of Brinks is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Brinks moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Brinks Company moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Brinks can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching
When determining whether Brinks Company offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Brinks' financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Brinks Company Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Brinks Company Stock:
Check out the analysis of Brinks Fundamentals Over Time.
You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Is Commercial Services & Supplies space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Brinks. If investors know Brinks will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Brinks listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.33)
Dividend Share
0.925
Earnings Share
2.65
Revenue Per Share
111.895
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.025
The market value of Brinks Company is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Brinks that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Brinks' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Brinks' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Brinks' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Brinks' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Brinks' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Brinks is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Brinks' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.