Brand Engagement Current Debt

BNAIW Stock   0.02  0.0002  0.96%   
Short and Long Term Debt Total is likely to drop to about 10.9 K in 2024. Net Debt is likely to drop to about (42.2 K) in 2024. Brand Engagement's financial risk is the risk to Brand Engagement stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt.
 
Debt Ratio  
First Reported
2010-12-31
Previous Quarter
0.17
Current Value
0.15
Quarterly Volatility
0.01143133
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
At this time, Brand Engagement's Total Current Liabilities is fairly stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to climb to about 23.2 M in 2024, whereas Non Current Liabilities Total is likely to drop slightly above 723.9 K in 2024.
  
Check out the analysis of Brand Engagement Fundamentals Over Time.

Brand Engagement Financial Rating

Brand Engagement Network financial ratings play a critical role in determining how much Brand Engagement have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for Brand Engagement's borrowing costs.
Piotroski F Score
2
FrailView
Beneish M Score
(3.89)
Unlikely ManipulatorView

Brand Engagement Total Assets Over Time

Brand Engagement Assets Financed by Debt

The debt-to-assets ratio shows the degree to which Brand Engagement uses debt to finance its assets. It includes both long-term and short-term borrowings maturing within one year. It also includes both tangible and intangible assets, such as goodwill.

Brand Engagement Debt Ratio

    
  15.0   
It appears most of the Brand Engagement's assets are financed through equity. Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Brand Engagement's operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Brand Engagement, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.

Understaning Brand Engagement Use of Financial Leverage

Understanding the structure of Brand Engagement's debt obligations provides insight if it is worth investing in it. Financial leverage can amplify the potential profits to Brand Engagement's owners, but it also increases the potential losses and risk of financial distress, including bankruptcy, if the firm cannot cover its cost of debt.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Short and Long Term Debt Total12.3 K10.9 K
Net Debt-40.2 K-42.2 K
Short Term Debt12.3 K10.9 K
Net Debt To EBITDA 0.01  0.01 
Debt To Equity 0.61  0.54 
Debt To Assets 0.17  0.15 
Total Debt To Capitalization 0.36  0.33 
Debt Equity Ratio 0.61  0.54 
Debt Ratio 0.17  0.15 
Please read more on our technical analysis page.

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.

Additional Tools for Brand Stock Analysis

When running Brand Engagement's price analysis, check to measure Brand Engagement's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Brand Engagement is operating at the current time. Most of Brand Engagement's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Brand Engagement's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Brand Engagement's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Brand Engagement to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.