Muramoto Electron Debt
| METCO Stock | THB 193.00 0.50 0.26% |
Muramoto Electron Public holds a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.2. With a high degree of financial leverage come high-interest payments, which usually reduce Muramoto Electron's Earnings Per Share (EPS).
Asset vs Debt
Equity vs Debt
Muramoto Electron's liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Muramoto Electron's cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Muramoto Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Muramoto Electron's stakeholders.
For most companies, including Muramoto Electron, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for Muramoto Electron Public, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, Muramoto Electron's management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Given that Muramoto Electron's debt-to-equity ratio measures a Company's obligations relative to the value of its net assets, it is usually used by traders to estimate the extent to which Muramoto Electron is acquiring new debt as a mechanism of leveraging its assets. A high debt-to-equity ratio is generally associated with increased risk, implying that it has been aggressive in financing its growth with debt. Another way to look at debt-to-equity ratios is to compare the overall debt load of Muramoto Electron to its assets or equity, showing how much of the company assets belong to shareholders vs. creditors. If shareholders own more assets, Muramoto Electron is said to be less leveraged. If creditors hold a majority of Muramoto Electron's assets, the Company is said to be highly leveraged.
Muramoto |
Muramoto Electron Public Debt to Cash Allocation
Muramoto Electron Public has accumulated 125.84 M in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 2.2, implying the company greatly relies on financing operations through barrowing. Muramoto Electron Public has a current ratio of 3.57, suggesting that it is liquid and has the ability to pay its financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Muramoto Electron until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Muramoto Electron's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Muramoto Electron Public sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Muramoto to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Muramoto Electron's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.Muramoto Electron Assets Financed by Debt
Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Muramoto Electron's operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Muramoto Electron, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.Muramoto Electron Corporate Bonds Issued
Most Muramoto bonds can be classified according to their maturity, which is the date when Muramoto Electron Public has to pay back the principal to investors. Maturities can be short-term, medium-term, or long-term (more than ten years). Longer-term bonds usually offer higher interest rates but may entail additional risks.
Understaning Muramoto Electron Use of Financial Leverage
Muramoto Electron's financial leverage ratio helps determine the effect of debt on the overall profitability of the company. It measures Muramoto Electron's total debt position, including all outstanding debt obligations, and compares it with Muramoto Electron's equity. Financial leverage can amplify the potential profits to Muramoto Electron's owners, but it also increases the potential losses and risk of financial distress, including bankruptcy, if Muramoto Electron is unable to cover its debt costs.
Muramoto Electron Public Company Limited manufactures and sells metal and plastic parts for audiovisual equipment and electronic equipment for automobiles and office automation appliances in Thailand, Japan, the United States, and internationally. Muramoto Electron Public Company Limited is a subsidiary of Muramoto Industry Co., Ltd. MURAMOTO ELECTRON operates under Consumer Electronics classification in Thailand and is traded on Stock Exchange of Thailand. Please read more on our technical analysis page.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectOther Information on Investing in Muramoto Stock
Muramoto Electron financial ratios help investors to determine whether Muramoto Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Muramoto with respect to the benefits of owning Muramoto Electron security.
What is Financial Leverage?
Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.Leverage and Capital Costs
The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.Benefits of Financial Leverage
Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:- Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
- It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
- Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.