Wheels Up Debt

UP Stock  USD 2.22  0.13  6.22%   
Wheels Up Experience holds a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.204. At this time, Wheels Up's Debt Equity Ratio is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/22/2024, Debt Ratio is likely to grow to 0.22, though Net Debt To EBITDA is likely to grow to (0.18). . Wheels Up's financial risk is the risk to Wheels Up stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt.

Asset vs Debt

Equity vs Debt

Wheels Up's liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Wheels Up's cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Wheels Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Wheels Up's stakeholders.
For most companies, including Wheels Up, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for Wheels Up Experience, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, Wheels Up's management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Price Book
2.9 K
Book Value
(0.17)
Operating Margin
(0.21)
Profit Margin
(0.40)
Return On Assets
(0.16)
At this time, Wheels Up's Total Current Liabilities is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/22/2024, Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to grow to about 1.6 B, while Non Current Liabilities Total is likely to drop slightly above 257.8 M.
  
Check out the analysis of Wheels Up Fundamentals Over Time.

Wheels Up Bond Ratings

Wheels Up Experience financial ratings play a critical role in determining how much Wheels Up have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for Wheels Up's borrowing costs.
Piotroski F Score
3
FrailView
Beneish M Score
(1.14)
Possible ManipulatorView

Wheels Up Experience Debt to Cash Allocation

Wheels Up Experience reports 336.9 M of total liabilities with total debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 0.2, which may suggest the company is not taking enough advantage from financial leverage. Wheels Up Experience has a current ratio of 0.53, implying that it has not enough working capital to pay out debt commitments in time. Note however, debt could still be an excellent tool for Wheels to invest in growth at high rates of return.

Wheels Up Total Assets Over Time

Wheels Up Assets Financed by Debt

The debt-to-assets ratio shows the degree to which Wheels Up uses debt to finance its assets. It includes both long-term and short-term borrowings maturing within one year. It also includes both tangible and intangible assets, such as goodwill.

Wheels Up Debt Ratio

    
  22.0   
It seems most of the Wheels Up's assets are financed through equity. Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Wheels Up's operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Wheels Up, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.

Wheels Up Corporate Bonds Issued

Wheels Short Long Term Debt Total

Short Long Term Debt Total

296.79 Million

At this time, Wheels Up's Short and Long Term Debt Total is relatively stable compared to the past year.

Understaning Wheels Up Use of Financial Leverage

Wheels Up's financial leverage ratio measures its total debt position, including all of its outstanding liabilities, and compares it to Wheels Up's current equity. If creditors own a majority of Wheels Up's assets, the company is considered highly leveraged. Understanding the composition and structure of Wheels Up's outstanding bonds gives an idea of how risky it is and if it is worth investing in.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Short and Long Term Debt Total336.9 M296.8 M
Net Debt73 M76.6 M
Short Term Debt46.9 M71.4 M
Long Term Debt235.1 M167.7 M
Long Term Debt Total260.2 M273.2 M
Short and Long Term Debt24 M30.3 M
Net Debt To EBITDA(0.19)(0.18)
Debt To Equity 2.89  3.04 
Interest Debt Per Share 2.44  2.32 
Debt To Assets 0.21  0.22 
Long Term Debt To Capitalization 0.71  0.79 
Total Debt To Capitalization 0.74  0.66 
Debt Equity Ratio 2.89  3.04 
Debt Ratio 0.21  0.22 
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio(2.36)(2.24)
Please read more on our technical analysis page.

Pair Trading with Wheels Up

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Wheels Up position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Wheels Up will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving together with Wheels Stock

  0.63OMAB Grupo Aeroportuario delPairCorr

Moving against Wheels Stock

  0.44BA Boeing Fiscal Year End 29th of January 2025 PairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Wheels Up could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Wheels Up when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Wheels Up - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Wheels Up Experience to buy it.
The correlation of Wheels Up is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Wheels Up moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Wheels Up Experience moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Wheels Up can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Additional Tools for Wheels Stock Analysis

When running Wheels Up's price analysis, check to measure Wheels Up's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Wheels Up is operating at the current time. Most of Wheels Up's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Wheels Up's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Wheels Up's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Wheels Up to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.