Howard Berk - Dine Brands Independent Director
| DIN Stock | USD 34.78 1.82 5.52% |
Director
Mr. Howard M. Berk is an Independent Director of DineEquity Inc. Since 2002, Mr. Berk was a partner at MSD Capital, L.P., a private investment firm. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Berk was managing director of TG Capital Corporationration, an investment group that manages the capital of a single family and acquires and invests in both public and private companies. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Berk was with The Stenbeck Group, acquiring and managing businesses in multiple countries. Prior to that, he was with Goldman, Sachs Co., where he worked in the principal investment area, as well as the mergers and acquisitions department. Mr. Berks qualifications to sit on the Corporationrationrations Board of Directors include his experience in dealing with public company boards of directors from a public investor perspective and his experience in finance and managing and investing private capital. since 2009.
| Age | 56 |
| Tenure | 15 years |
| Address | 10 West Walnut Street, Pasadena, CA, United States, 91103 |
| Phone | 818 240 6055 |
| Web | https://www.dinebrands.com |
Howard Berk Latest Insider Activity
Tracking and analyzing the buying and selling activities of Howard Berk against Dine Brands stock is an integral part of due diligence when investing in Dine Brands. Howard Berk insider activity provides valuable insight into whether Dine Brands is net buyers or sellers over its current business cycle. Note, Dine Brands insiders must abide by specific rules, including filing SEC forms every time they buy or sell Dine Brands'shares to prevent insider trading or benefiting illegally from material non-public information that their positions give them access to.
Howard Berk over three months ago Acquisition by Howard Berk of tradable shares of Dine Brands subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Dine Brands Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0678 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0678 of profit. This is way below average. Dine Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Dine Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 26th of November 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.11, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.14. At this time, Dine Brands' Non Currrent Assets Other are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 26th of November 2024, Other Current Assets is likely to grow to about 88 M, while Total Assets are likely to drop about 1.6 B.Similar Executives
| Found 11 records | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| James Katzman | Brinker International | 53 | |
| Frances Allen | Brinker International | 58 | |
| Rana Schirmer | BJs Restaurants | N/A | |
| William Giles | Brinker International | 61 | |
| Prashant Ranade | Brinker International | 67 | |
| Harriet Edelman | Brinker International | 65 | |
| Carl Richmond | BJs Restaurants | 65 | |
| Cynthia Davis | Brinker International | 58 | |
| Carl CPA | BJs Restaurants | 65 | |
| George Mrkonic | Brinker International | 68 | |
| Alexandre Macedo | Brinker International | 43 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Asset | 0.0678 |
Dine Brands Global Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Dine Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Dine Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Dine. The board's role is to monitor Dine Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Dine Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Dine Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Christine Son, Senior Vice President Legal, General Counsel, Company Secretary | ||
| Richard Dahl, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Lilian Tomovich, Independent Director | ||
| Gregory Bever, VP Officer | ||
| Jay Johns, President - IHOP Business Unit | ||
| Sarah CannonFoster, Chief Officer | ||
| Kieran Donahue, Chief IHOP | ||
| Tony Moralejo, President Development | ||
| Michael Hyter, Independent Director | ||
| Brett Levy, Vice Treasury | ||
| Larry Kay, Independent Director | ||
| Vance Chang, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Thien Ho, Executive Communications | ||
| Douglas Pasquale, Independent Director | ||
| Susan Nelson, Vice Affairs | ||
| Stephen Joyce, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Allison Hall, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| Charles Scaccia, Senior Operations | ||
| Caroline Nahas, Independent Director | ||
| John Cywinski, President of Applebee's Business Unit | ||
| Howard Berk, Independent Director | ||
| Thomas Song, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Ken Diptee, Executive Relations | ||
| Susan Collyns, Independent Director | ||
| Scott Gladstone, Chief International | ||
| John Peyton, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Justin Skelton, Chief Officer | ||
| Christie Cook, Vice Resources | ||
| Gilbert Ray, Independent Director | ||
| Daniel Brestle, Independent Director | ||
| Martha Poulter, Independent Director | ||
| Bryan Adel, Senior Vice President - Legal, General Counsel, Secretary |
Dine Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Dine Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Asset | 0.0678 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.11 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.23 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.92 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 15.25 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 2.49 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 97.51 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 2.01 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 13.57 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.62 X |
Pair Trading with Dine Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Dine Stock
| 0.43 | ARKR | Ark Restaurants Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.4 | LNW | Light Wonder | PairCorr |
| 0.39 | BLMN | Bloomin Brands | PairCorr |
| 0.32 | IGT | International Game | PairCorr |
| 0.31 | WING | Wingstop | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Dine Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Dine Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Dine Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Dine Brands Global to buy it.
The correlation of Dine Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Dine Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Dine Brands Global moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Dine Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Dine Brands Global. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.
Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Dine Brands. If investors know Dine will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Dine Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.046 | Dividend Share 2.04 | Earnings Share 6.01 | Revenue Per Share 54.322 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.04) |
The market value of Dine Brands Global is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Dine that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Dine Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Dine Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Dine Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Dine Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Dine Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Dine Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Dine Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.