James Porter - Medical Facilities Vice President - Operations
| DR Stock | CAD 16.18 0.31 1.95% |
Insider
James Porter is Vice President - Operations of Medical Facilities since 2018.
| Tenure | 6 years |
| Address | 4576 Yonge Street, Toronto, ON, Canada, M2N 6N4 |
| Phone | 877 402 7162 |
| Web | https://www.medicalfacilitiescorp.ca |
Medical Facilities Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.136 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.136 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.4807 %, meaning that it generated $0.4807 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Medical Facilities' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Medical Facilities manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Medical Facilities' Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 26th of November 2024, Return On Equity is likely to grow to 0.23, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.16. At this time, Medical Facilities' Intangibles To Total Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 26th of November 2024, Fixed Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 4.24, while Intangible Assets are likely to drop about 10.7 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| Diana Discepola | Rogers Sugar | N/A | |
| MBA MBA | Exchange Income | 60 | |
| Curtis Anderson | Exchange Income | N/A | |
| John Toffoletto | Extendicare | N/A | |
| Richard Wowryk | Exchange Income | N/A | |
| David Hung | Sienna Senior Living | N/A | |
| Olga Giovanniello | Sienna Senior Living | N/A | |
| Teresa Fritsch | Sienna Senior Living | N/A | |
| Hank Gibson | Exchange Income | N/A | |
| Hugh Boyd | Sienna Senior Living | N/A | |
| LLB QC | Exchange Income | 56 | |
| Ali Mir | Extendicare | N/A | |
| Daniel Lafrance | Rogers Sugar | 64 | |
| Brian Johnston | Sienna Senior Living | 60 | |
| Stephen Foster | Sienna Senior Living | N/A | |
| Stephanie Wilkes | Rogers Sugar | N/A | |
| Patrick Dionne | Rogers Sugar | N/A | |
| Michael Walton | Rogers Sugar | N/A | |
| Matthew Morgan | Extendicare | N/A | |
| Nancy Webb | Sienna Senior Living | N/A | |
| Grace Schalkwyk | Exchange Income | 63 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.48 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.14 |
Medical Facilities Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Medical Facilities' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Medical Facilities inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Medical. The board's role is to monitor Medical Facilities' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Medical Facilities' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Medical Facilities' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| David Bellaire, Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| James Porter, Vice President - Operations | ||
| R Curd, Chief Executive Officer, Sioux Falls Specialty Hospital | ||
| Blake Curd, Chief LLP | ||
| Kevin Blaylock, Chief LLC | ||
| Brian Fowler, LL Hospital | ||
| Erin Enright, Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| Stephen Dineley, Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| Robert Horrar, President, Chief Executive Officer, Executive Director | ||
| William May, Compliance Director | ||
| Tyler Murphy, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President - Finance | ||
| David Watson, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| John Schario, Chief Officer | ||
| Jeffrey Lozon, Chairman of the Board | ||
| Dale Lawr, Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| James Rolfe, Chief Development Officer | ||
| Reza Shahim, Non-Executive, Non-Independent Director |
Medical Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Medical Facilities a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.48 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.14 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.04 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.13 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 489.91 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 23.49 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 8.09 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 14.61 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 19.72 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 3.53 X |
Pair Trading with Medical Facilities
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Medical Facilities position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Medical Facilities will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Medical Stock
Moving against Medical Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Medical Facilities could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Medical Facilities when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Medical Facilities - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Medical Facilities to buy it.
The correlation of Medical Facilities is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Medical Facilities moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Medical Facilities moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Medical Facilities can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Other Information on Investing in Medical Stock
Medical Facilities financial ratios help investors to determine whether Medical Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Medical with respect to the benefits of owning Medical Facilities security.