Rebecca Frankiewicz - Energizer Holdings Independent Director
| ENR Stock | USD 38.30 0.21 0.55% |
Insider
Rebecca Frankiewicz is Independent Director of Energizer Holdings since 2020.
| Age | 49 |
| Tenure | 4 years |
| Address | 533 Maryville University Drive, Saint Louis, MO, United States, 63141 |
| Phone | 314 985 2000 |
| Web | https://www.energizerholdings.com |
Rebecca Frankiewicz Latest Insider Activity
Tracking and analyzing the buying and selling activities of Rebecca Frankiewicz against Energizer Holdings stock is an integral part of due diligence when investing in Energizer Holdings. Rebecca Frankiewicz insider activity provides valuable insight into whether Energizer Holdings is net buyers or sellers over its current business cycle. Note, Energizer Holdings insiders must abide by specific rules, including filing SEC forms every time they buy or sell Energizer Holdings'shares to prevent insider trading or benefiting illegally from material non-public information that their positions give them access to.
Rebecca Frankiewicz over two months ago Acquisition by Rebecca Frankiewicz of 4709 shares of Energizer Holdings subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Rebecca Frankiewicz over six months ago Acquisition by Rebecca Frankiewicz of 4709 shares of Energizer Holdings subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Rebecca Frankiewicz over six months ago Acquisition by Rebecca Frankiewicz of 430 shares of Energizer Holdings subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Energizer Holdings Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.067 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.067 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0703 %, implying that it generated $0.0703 on every 100 dollars invested. Energizer Holdings' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Energizer Holdings manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/22/2024, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.20, while Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.02. At this time, Energizer Holdings' Other Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/22/2024, Other Current Assets is likely to grow to about 198.9 M, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 2.2 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| Edward Monser | Vertiv Holdings Co | 70 | |
| Cheryl Lim | Vertiv Holdings Co | 53 | |
| Daniel Innamorato | Hubbell | N/A | |
| Pete Shannin | Acuity Brands | N/A | |
| Adam Smith | Kimball Electronics | N/A | |
| Robin Washington | Vertiv Holdings Co | 58 | |
| Isabel Wells | Kimball Electronics | 47 | |
| Andrew Klaus | Vertiv Holdings Co | 54 | |
| John Hewitt | Vertiv Holdings Co | 50 | |
| Barry Potoker | Espey Mfg Electronics | N/A | |
| Colin Flannery | Vertiv Holdings Co | 53 | |
| Rhett Hernandez | Hubbell | 68 | |
| Patrick Johnson | Vertiv Holdings Co | 49 | |
| Thomas Peterson | Preformed Line Products | N/A | |
| Kevin Fairbairn | Advanced Energy Industries | 70 | |
| James Farrell | Hubbell | 51 | |
| Nicola Palmer | nVent Electric PLC | 53 | |
| Roger Fradin | Vertiv Holdings Co | 67 | |
| Steve Lalla | Vertiv Holdings Co | 57 | |
| Scott Cripps | Vertiv Holdings Co | N/A | |
| Peter Lau | Hubbell | 41 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0703 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.067 |
Energizer Holdings Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Energizer Holdings' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Energizer Holdings inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Energizer. The board's role is to monitor Energizer Holdings' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Energizer Holdings' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Energizer Holdings' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| John Drabik, Senior Vice President Chief Accounting Officer, Corporate Controller, Treasurer | ||
| Donal Mulligan, Independent Director | ||
| Kevin Hunt, Independent Director | ||
| John Klein, Independent Director | ||
| Dan McCarthy, Chief Officer | ||
| Kathryn Dugan, General Secretary | ||
| Michael Lampman, Executive Units | ||
| Alan Hoskins, CEO and President Director and Member of Fin. and Oversight Committee | ||
| Cynthia Brinkley, Independent Director | ||
| Bill Armstrong, Independent Director | ||
| Mark LaVigne, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Sara Hampton, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President, Global Controller | ||
| Benjamin Angelette, Chief Officer | ||
| James Johnson, Independent Director | ||
| Hannah Kim, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary | ||
| Lori Shambro, Executive Officer | ||
| Patrick Moore, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Susan Drath, Chief Human Resource Officer | ||
| Rebecca Frankiewicz, Independent Director | ||
| Jacqueline Burwitz, VP Relations | ||
| Mark JD, CEO President | ||
| Robin Vauth, Executive International | ||
| Nneka Rimmer, Independent Director | ||
| Timothy Gorman, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| Emily Boss, Vice President, General Counsel | ||
| Jonathan Poldan, Vice Treasurer | ||
| Robert Vitale, Independent Director | ||
| Carlos AbramsRivera, Independent Director | ||
| Terence Calloway, CTO Supply |
Energizer Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Energizer Holdings a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0703 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.067 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.16 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 5.8 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 71.92 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 9.30 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 87.32 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 2.75 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 10.79 X |
Pair Trading with Energizer Holdings
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Energizer Holdings position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energizer Holdings will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Energizer Stock
| 0.78 | UL | Unilever PLC ADR | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | UG | United Guardian | PairCorr |
| 0.67 | CL | Colgate Palmolive Fiscal Year End 24th of January 2025 | PairCorr |
| 0.56 | EL | Estee Lauder Companies | PairCorr |
| 0.55 | KMB | Kimberly Clark Fiscal Year End 22nd of January 2025 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Energizer Holdings could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Energizer Holdings when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Energizer Holdings - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Energizer Holdings to buy it.
The correlation of Energizer Holdings is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Energizer Holdings moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Energizer Holdings moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Energizer Holdings can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Energizer Stock Analysis
When running Energizer Holdings' price analysis, check to measure Energizer Holdings' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Energizer Holdings is operating at the current time. Most of Energizer Holdings' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Energizer Holdings' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Energizer Holdings' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Energizer Holdings to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.