Paul Lee - VerticalScope Holdings Chief Officer
| FORA Stock | 8.77 0.27 3.18% |
Insider
Paul Lee is Chief Officer of VerticalScope Holdings
| Address | 111 Peter Street, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5V 2H1 |
| Phone | 416 341 7166 |
| Web | https://www.verticalscope.com |
VerticalScope Holdings Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0384 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0384 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.0341 %, meaning that it generated $0.0341 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. VerticalScope Holdings' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well VerticalScope Holdings manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 26th of November 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.11. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to -0.02. At this time, VerticalScope Holdings' Total Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 26th of November 2024, Non Current Assets Total is likely to grow to about 134.6 M, while Net Tangible Assets are likely to drop (50.4 M).Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| Satya Nadella | Microsoft Corp CDR | 57 | |
| Sergey Brin | Alphabet Inc CDR | 50 | |
| Kent Walker | Alphabet Inc CDR | 63 | |
| Miguel Labarthe | Bank of Nova | N/A | |
| Mary Erdoes | JPMorgan Chase Co | 57 | |
| Larry Page | Alphabet Inc CDR | 51 | |
| L Thomson | Bank of Nova | 49 | |
| Sundar Pichai | Alphabet Inc CDR | 51 | |
| Jeremy Barnum | JPMorgan Chase Co | 51 | |
| Reginald JD | JPMorgan Chase Co | N/A | |
| James Wilson | Apple Inc CDR | N/A | |
| Jennifer Piepszak | JPMorgan Chase Co | 53 | |
| Adrian Rosiles | Bank of Nova | N/A | |
| Dave Fildes | Amazon CDR | N/A | |
| Philip Smith | Bank of Nova | N/A | |
| Keith Esq | Microsoft Corp CDR | N/A | |
| Rania Llewellyn | Bank of Nova | N/A | |
| Frank Shaw | Microsoft Corp CDR | N/A | |
| Fiona Cicconi | Alphabet Inc CDR | 58 | |
| James Dimon | JPMorgan Chase Co | 68 | |
| Nancy Paxton | Apple Inc CDR | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0341 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0384 |
VerticalScope Holdings Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the VerticalScope Holdings' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: VerticalScope Holdings inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of VerticalScope. The board's role is to monitor VerticalScope Holdings' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. VerticalScope Holdings' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, VerticalScope Holdings' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Vincenzo Bellissimo, Chief Officer | ||
| Christopher Goodridge, President COO | ||
| Joe Pishgar, Chief Officer | ||
| Paul Lee, Chief Officer | ||
| Diane Yu, Chief Secretary | ||
| Robert Laidlaw, CEO Founder | ||
| Brandon Seibel, Chief Officer | ||
| Kendal Clarke, Chief Officer |
VerticalScope Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is VerticalScope Holdings a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0341 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0384 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.04 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.15 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 236.66 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 18.42 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 28.20 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 5.09 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.38 K | ||||
| Price To Book | 1.59 X |
Pair Trading with VerticalScope Holdings
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if VerticalScope Holdings position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in VerticalScope Holdings will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against VerticalScope Stock
| 0.61 | RY | Royal Bank | PairCorr |
| 0.55 | RY-PJ | Royal Bank | PairCorr |
| 0.47 | RY-PM | Royal Bank | PairCorr |
| 0.4 | TD-PFI | Toronto Dominion Bank | PairCorr |
| 0.35 | RY-PS | Royal Bank | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to VerticalScope Holdings could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace VerticalScope Holdings when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back VerticalScope Holdings - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling VerticalScope Holdings to buy it.
The correlation of VerticalScope Holdings is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as VerticalScope Holdings moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if VerticalScope Holdings moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for VerticalScope Holdings can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Other Information on Investing in VerticalScope Stock
VerticalScope Holdings financial ratios help investors to determine whether VerticalScope Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in VerticalScope with respect to the benefits of owning VerticalScope Holdings security.