Nancy Stuebe - Interactive Brokers Director Relations
| IBKR Stock | USD 185.68 5.41 2.83% |
Insider
Nancy Stuebe is Director Relations of Interactive Brokers Group
| Age | 60 |
| Address | One Pickwick Plaza, Greenwich, CT, United States, 06830 |
| Phone | 203 618 5800 |
| Web | https://www.interactivebrokers.com |
Interactive Brokers Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0236 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0236 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.2171 %, meaning that it created $0.2171 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Interactive Brokers' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Interactive Brokers manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 12/03/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.24. At this time, Interactive Brokers' Total Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 12/03/2024, Non Current Assets Total is likely to grow to about 130.9 B, while Total Current Assets are likely to drop slightly above 108.8 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| Lori Nelson | Boyd Gaming | 43 | |
| Heidi Cormack | NETGEAR | 49 | |
| C Lo | NETGEAR | 67 | |
| Layth Taki | Ziff Davis | 49 | |
| Dean Papadakis | Kite Realty Group | N/A | |
| Michael Cohen | Tradeweb Markets | 61 | |
| Bret Richter | Ziff Davis | 54 | |
| Feng Zhou | NetEase | 46 | |
| Arjen Berendsen | Ziff Davis | N/A | |
| Sara Furber | Tradeweb Markets | 48 | |
| Tyler Henshaw | Kite Realty Group | N/A | |
| Cathy Cao | Kandi Technologies Group | N/A | |
| Christopher Gibase | Boyd Gaming | N/A | |
| Meghan Frank | Lululemon Athletica | 47 | |
| Joey Fortuna | Ziff Davis | N/A | |
| A Thoman | Boyd Gaming | 69 | |
| Devi Shanmugham | Tradeweb Markets | N/A | |
| Jehn Lim | Kandi Technologies Group | 43 | |
| Margaret Shi | NetEase | N/A | |
| Derrick Burks | Kite Realty Group | 64 | |
| CMA CFA | Tradeweb Markets | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.22 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0236 |
Interactive Brokers Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Interactive Brokers' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Interactive Brokers inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Interactive. The board's role is to monitor Interactive Brokers' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Interactive Brokers' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Interactive Brokers' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Thomas Peterffy, Founder, Chairman, CEO, Chairman of Compensation Committee and Chairman of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ||
| Thomas Frank, CIO and Executive VP | ||
| Paul Brody, CFO, Treasurer, Secretary and Director | ||
| David Friedland, Managing Operations | ||
| Denis Mendonca, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller | ||
| Milan Galik, Pres and Director | ||
| Nancy Stuebe, Director Relations |
Interactive Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Interactive Brokers a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.22 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0236 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.14 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.66 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 17.24 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 108.88 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 3.12 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 87.26 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 1.82 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 23.01 X |
Pair Trading with Interactive Brokers
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Interactive Brokers position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Interactive Brokers will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Interactive Stock
| 0.85 | V | Visa Class A | PairCorr |
| 0.8 | DHIL | Diamond Hill Investment | PairCorr |
| 0.93 | DIST | Distoken Acquisition | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | AB | AllianceBernstein | PairCorr |
| 0.74 | AC | Associated Capital | PairCorr |
Moving against Interactive Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Interactive Brokers could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Interactive Brokers when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Interactive Brokers - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Interactive Brokers Group to buy it.
The correlation of Interactive Brokers is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Interactive Brokers moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Interactive Brokers moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Interactive Brokers can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Interactive Stock Analysis
When running Interactive Brokers' price analysis, check to measure Interactive Brokers' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Interactive Brokers is operating at the current time. Most of Interactive Brokers' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Interactive Brokers' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Interactive Brokers' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Interactive Brokers to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.