Genevieve Cunningham - Monolithic Power Supervisor Communications
| MPWR Stock | USD 580.81 8.34 1.46% |
Insider
Genevieve Cunningham is Supervisor Communications of Monolithic Power Systems
| Address | 5808 Lake Washington Boulevard NE, Kirkland, WA, United States, 98033 |
| Phone | 425 296 9956 |
| Web | https://www.monolithicpower.com |
Monolithic Power Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1171 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1171 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.2021 %, meaning that it created $0.2021 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Monolithic Power's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Monolithic Power manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/25/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.18. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.23. At this time, Monolithic Power's Return On Tangible Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/25/2024, Fixed Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 7.18, while Intangible Assets are likely to drop slightly above 121.3 K.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| Sajid Daudi | Microchip Technology | N/A | |
| Brent Dietz | Qorvo Inc | N/A | |
| Margaret Chadwick | Wolfspeed | N/A | |
| Sukhi Nagesh | Globalfoundries | N/A | |
| Julie Knecht | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 51 | |
| John Hodge | Wolfspeed | 53 | |
| John Replogle | Wolfspeed | 54 | |
| Phil Stathas | Allegro Microsystems | N/A | |
| Thomas Werner | Wolfspeed | 64 | |
| Gregory Henderson | Analog Devices | 55 | |
| Gregg Bartlett | Globalfoundries | 62 | |
| Steven Miles | Allegro Microsystems | 76 | |
| Mark Gill | Allegro Microsystems | N/A | |
| Marvin Riley | Wolfspeed | 46 | |
| Glenda Dorchak | Wolfspeed | 66 | |
| Jason Zhang | Navitas Semiconductor Corp | N/A | |
| Daniel Kinzer | Navitas Semiconductor Corp | 66 | |
| Thomas Teebagy | Allegro Microsystems | 64 | |
| Thomas Weber | Globalfoundries | 55 | |
| Pradheepa Raman | Globalfoundries | 43 | |
| Craig Stein | Synaptics Incorporated | 57 | |
Management Performance
Monolithic Power Systems Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Monolithic Power's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Monolithic Power inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Monolithic. The board's role is to monitor Monolithic Power's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Monolithic Power's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Monolithic Power's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Saria Tseng, VP of Strategic Corporate Devel., General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | ||
| Michael Hsing, Founder, Chairman, CEO and Pres | ||
| Theodore CPA, Executive CFO | ||
| Meera Rao, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer | ||
| Deming Xiao, President of Asia Operations | ||
| Genevieve Cunningham, Supervisor Communications | ||
| Theodore Blegen, Executive CFO | ||
| Maurice Sciammas, Sr. VP of Worldwide Sales and Marketing | ||
| Bernie Blegen, CFO, Corporate Controller |
Monolithic Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Monolithic Power a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.2 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.12 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.21 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.26 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 26.88 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 48.78 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 3.37 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 97.25 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 1.49 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 45.59 X |
Pair Trading with Monolithic Power
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Monolithic Power position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Monolithic Power will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Monolithic Stock
Moving against Monolithic Stock
| 0.91 | EHGO | Eshallgo Class A Downward Rally | PairCorr |
| 0.79 | CWAN | Clearwater Analytics | PairCorr |
| 0.65 | ASAN | Asana Inc | PairCorr |
| 0.59 | CSCO | Cisco Systems Aggressive Push | PairCorr |
| 0.48 | INTC | Intel Fiscal Year End 23rd of January 2025 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Monolithic Power could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Monolithic Power when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Monolithic Power - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Monolithic Power Systems to buy it.
The correlation of Monolithic Power is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Monolithic Power moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Monolithic Power Systems moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Monolithic Power can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Monolithic Stock Analysis
When running Monolithic Power's price analysis, check to measure Monolithic Power's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Monolithic Power is operating at the current time. Most of Monolithic Power's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Monolithic Power's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Monolithic Power's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Monolithic Power to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.