Graeme Pitkethly - Pearson PLC Independent Non-Executive Director
| PSO Stock | USD 15.33 0.22 1.46% |
Director
Mr. Graeme David Pitkethly is Independent NonExecutive Director of the Company. Graeme joined Unilever in 2002 and, prior to being appointed CFO, was Executive Vice President of Unilever UK and Ireland business. Previously, he had held a number of senior financial and commercial roles within Unilever and he spent the earlier part of his career in senior corporate finance roles in the telecommunications industry and at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Graeme is a Vice Chair of the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures. He read for a BSc in Applied Chemistry from the University of Strathclyde and is a Chartered Accountant. since 2019.
| Age | 54 |
| Tenure | 5 years |
| Address | 80 Strand, London, United Kingdom, WC2R 0RL |
| Phone | 44 20 7010 2000 |
| Web | https://www.pearsonplc.com |
Pearson PLC Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0485 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0485 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0878 %, implying that it generated $0.0878 on every 100 dollars invested. Pearson PLC's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Pearson PLC manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Pearson PLC's Return On Capital Employed is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 22nd of November 2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.06, while Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.09. At this time, Pearson PLC's Return On Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 22nd of November 2024, Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 0.70, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop about 4.2 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Manuel Bronstein | New York Times | 45 | |
| Arthur Golden | New York Times | 64 | |
| Richard Cole | Lee Enterprises Incorporated | 76 | |
| Debra Sandler | Gannett Co | 60 | |
| Margaret Liberman | Lee Enterprises Incorporated | 50 | |
| Brent Magid | Lee Enterprises Incorporated | 53 | |
| John Rogers | New York Times | 62 | |
| Brian McAndrews | New York Times | 62 | |
| Doreen Toben | New York Times | 71 | |
| Robert Denham | New York Times | 74 | |
| Rachel Glaser | New York Times | 59 | |
| Amanpal Bhutani | New York Times | 44 | |
| Herbert Moloney | Lee Enterprises Incorporated | 67 | |
| Hays Golden | New York Times | 36 | |
| Peter Warwick | Scholastic | 72 | |
| Harlan Toplitzky | New York Times | N/A | |
| Rebecca Dyck | New York Times | 51 | |
| Andrew Hedden | Scholastic | 83 | |
| William Mayer | Lee Enterprises Incorporated | 79 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0878 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0485 |
Pearson PLC ADR Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Pearson PLC's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Pearson PLC inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Pearson. The board's role is to monitor Pearson PLC's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Pearson PLC's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Pearson PLC's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Jonathan ChocqueelMangan, Chief Strategy Officer | ||
| Bob Whelan, President – Assessment & Qualifications | ||
| Art Valentine, President - Assessment and Qualifications | ||
| Linda Lorimer, Independent Non-Executive Director | ||
| John Fallon, CEO, Director and Chief Executive of International Education Bus.es | ||
| Vivienne Cox, Senior Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| Josh Lewis, Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| Joanne Russell, Financial Relations | ||
| Rod Bristow, President – UK & Global Online Learning | ||
| Tom Simon, President – Virtual Learning | ||
| Stephen Jones, Sr. VP of Company Secretarial and Deputy Secretary | ||
| Omid Kordestani, Non-Executive Director and Chairman Designate | ||
| Anna Persson, Chief Human Resource Officer | ||
| Sally Johnson, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Director | ||
| Cinthia Nespoli, Chief Legal Officer | ||
| Annette Thomas, Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| Deepak Mehrotra, Managing Bus | ||
| Graeme Baldwin, Senior Vice President General Counsel, Company Secretary | ||
| Graeme Pitkethly, Independent Non-Executive Director | ||
| Adam CBE, Executive Officer | ||
| Omar Abbosh, CEO Director | ||
| Dave Treat, Chief Officer | ||
| Ishantha Lokuge, Chief Product Officer and Co-President Direct to Consumer | ||
| Bjarne Tellmann, General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer | ||
| Sidney Taurel, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Lincoln Wallen, Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| Lynne Frank, Chief Marketing Officer and Co-President Direct to Consumer | ||
| Mike Howells, Chief Strategy Officer and Interim President - Workforce Skills | ||
| Tim Bozik, President – Higher Education, Interim Chief Product Officer and Co-President, Direct to Consumer | ||
| Robert Whelan, President Qualifications | ||
| Elizabeth Corley, Independent Non-Executive Director | ||
| Allison Bebo, Chief Human Resource Officer | ||
| Esther Lee, Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| Deirdre Latour, Chief Corporate Affairs Officer | ||
| Marykay Wells, Chief Officer | ||
| Tim Score, Non-Executive Deputy Chairman of the Board | ||
| Sherry Coutu, Independent Non-Executive Director | ||
| Andy Bird, Chief Executive Officer, Executive Director | ||
| Michael Lynton, Non-Executive Independent Director | ||
| Giovanni Giovannelli, President – English Language Learning | ||
| Ginny Ziegler, Chief Officer | ||
| Albert Hitchcock, Head of Telecom and Technology Partnerships |
Pearson Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Pearson PLC a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0878 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0485 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.1 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.13 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 11.71 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 664.07 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.12 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 2.97 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 931.3 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 20.79 X |
Pair Trading with Pearson PLC
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Pearson PLC position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Pearson PLC will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Pearson Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Pearson PLC could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Pearson PLC when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Pearson PLC - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Pearson PLC ADR to buy it.
The correlation of Pearson PLC is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Pearson PLC moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Pearson PLC ADR moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Pearson PLC can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Pearson PLC ADR. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in state. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.
Is Publishing space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Pearson PLC. If investors know Pearson will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Pearson PLC listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.12) | Dividend Share 0.231 | Earnings Share 0.63 | Revenue Per Share 5.108 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.07) |
The market value of Pearson PLC ADR is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Pearson that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Pearson PLC's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Pearson PLC's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Pearson PLC's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Pearson PLC's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Pearson PLC's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Pearson PLC is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Pearson PLC's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.